Where is Nissan Headed?

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
VQpwrdSE-R
Posts: 649
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Car: 2005 Code Red Nissan Altima SE-R
2013 Nissan Altima SV
Location: Pennsylvania

Post

Alpha I like your coupe but I'm not seeing all this QR love. The only downfall I see with the FWD VQ is the in depth tear down to get to the rear plugs/ coils. That hassle is easily overlooked every time I hammer down on the throttle :)

The QR is a good engine... for my wife. She likes the new '13 altima needs something better on gas and I'm looking to dump the 9-3. If the new QR didnt get 38 mpg and was only 2-3mpg better than v6 I would be getting a VQ in the '13. have a hard time seeing Nissan dropping one of their flagship Engines. If that's the case I'll be looking for a new company to show my loyalty to.


User avatar
alphapig
Posts: 1972
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 2:52 pm
Car: Nissan Altima Coupe S 2.5
Location: NorCal

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:
alphapig wrote:And I don't mean merging and rage-passing either. It hauls my a** up a mountain road at around 4.5k RPM.
4.5k RPM!!?? That's NUTS! That's easily 1500rpm higher than I EVER want to see while cruising at reasonable speed. 4.5k is embarrassing, not boastworthy.

I'm barely at 2500 rpm at 80mph. That goes for hills, mountains, and anything else you might pave a road on.
And even the VQ would shave ~1000rpm off of that pathetic 4.5k.
What the hell does 2.5k rpm at 80mph have to do with twisty mountain roads?

Pic of said roads:

Image

Enjoy your highway queen

User avatar
Ace2cool
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX TT
1966 Datsun Fairlady 1600
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600
1974 Honda CB550 Four
2009 Ford F150 Lariat
Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Post

4.5k isn't really an issue for something that revs to 7k. Just saying.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:
alphapig wrote:The options for new ~25k coupes, in the end of 2007, were:

1. Altima Coupe
2. Accord Coupe
3. Hyundai Tiburon
4. Mustang v6
5. Scion TC
Don't forget the Camry Solara!
Image

Sleekest lines this side of a bowl of regurgitated cat s***.
Oh god that's bad.

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:4.5k RPM!!?? That's NUTS! That's easily 1500rpm higher than I EVER want to see while cruising at reasonable speed. 4.5k is embarrassing, not boastworthy.
:werd:

80 mph in the Vette = < 2000 rpm
80 mph in the Frontier = <2000 rpm ......while hauling a Datsun behind it on a trailer
80 mph in the Insight = < 2000 rpm
80 mph in the Z = 3,200 rpm, give or take
the list continues...

none of our cars are hitting 4500 RPM unless we are dropping a gear to pass someone driving anything with a four-banger paired to a CVT.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Ace2cool wrote:4.5k isn't really an issue for something that revs to 7k. Just saying.
Driving along at 4500 rpm IS an issue. Unless you're accelerating, you shouldn't be anywhere near 4500 rpm. We're just talking about driving here, not hammering the twisties.
alphapig wrote: Enjoy your highway queen
Highway queen? Ok, now you're just being ignorant. Having a V6 does NOT equate to a highway queen...IN ANY MANNER. The V6 option is there to provide people who want more torque, the ability to have it at throttle tip in. Removing the option does nothing but limit someones choices and force them to buy another make or model.

My old 1999 V8 BMW with 187,000 miles on it still gets between 28 and 30 mpg on the highway. It also makes over 280 ft lbs of torque by 3000 rpm. That's more torque then the Altima makes at any rpm. This allows me to climb mountain roads at a leisurely rpm. I'm not trying to equate a 4.4 liter to a 2.5 liter in terms of displacement and performance. I'm simply trying to explain the difference in torque. You can still get very decent gas mileage and have a larger displacement motor.

I don't like 4 cylinder cars for the most part. My 240 happens to have one, but I run enough boost through it to have it behave like a much larger engine.

If I were looking for a new car, I would prefer one with a V6 or better. By not offering me that option you force me to look somewhere else. There is no reason the Altima shouldn't offer the 6, especially when the 4 cylinder variation only gets a few mpg more than the V6 would.

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

I don't think he's quietly cruising up those roads.....

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

krash wrote:I don't think he's quietly cruising up those roads.....
Ok, if he's not just driving along are we really going to compare the VQ35 to the QR25 where performance is concerned? Yes the QR will pull the the Altima along, but it will not do it as well as the VQ. The VQ will outperform the QR in every facet and still have the ability to get decent mileage.

My argument isn't that the QR is a bad motor. My argument is that it isn't smart to not have the option available. Lack of options isn't a good idea.

There are many people that don't want to settle for "just fine" when they're buying a new car.

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

Oh heck no, as far as I'm concerned, the QR doesn't exist when the VQ is in the room. I just think it came off like he was saying the car was cruising along at 4.5k, which would be retarded. I hope thats not what he was saying....

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

I think he might be saying that. Only because I've driven the Alty with the 2.5 around the back country of PA. If there is an incline and you're trying to maintain speed you're effectively in passing gear because the engine doesn't have enough torque to maintain speed in a higher gear.

User avatar
Dattebayo
Posts: 33288
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 10:04 am
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier Desert Runner
Location: NE DC

Post

nissangirl74 wrote:none of our cars are hitting 4500 RPM unless we are dropping a gear to pass someone driving anything with a four-banger paired to a CVT.
They are if you are in second and third gear hauling up a mountain at non-recommended speeds...

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Dattebayo wrote:
nissangirl74 wrote:none of our cars are hitting 4500 RPM unless we are dropping a gear to pass someone driving anything with a four-banger paired to a CVT.
They are if you are in second and third gear hauling up a mountain at non-recommended speeds...
This is true. But in that case, I don't see what the original 4500 has to do with anything, either.

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

Dattebayo wrote:
nissangirl74 wrote:none of our cars are hitting 4500 RPM unless we are dropping a gear to pass someone driving anything with a four-banger paired to a CVT.
They are if you are in second and third gear hauling up a mountain at non-recommended speeds...
He's in a CVT. They don't have gears.

User avatar
alphapig
Posts: 1972
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 2:52 pm
Car: Nissan Altima Coupe S 2.5
Location: NorCal

Post

krash wrote:I don't think he's quietly cruising up those roads.....
I should have specified this, my mistake.
Dattebayo wrote:
nissangirl74 wrote:none of our cars are hitting 4500 RPM unless we are dropping a gear to pass someone driving anything with a four-banger paired to a CVT.
They are if you are in second and third gear hauling up a mountain at non-recommended speeds...
I drive with mainly 240 drivers (who are balls-off-the-wall crazy)

A 4-banger is tons of fun in the mountains. Revs are tons of fun in the mountains. What I was trying to get accross is that my 2.5l 4-banger doesn't need to bounce of the rev limiter to haul my 3000lb a** up a mountain, which, for me, is more than sufficient.

Nothing I said should be applied to regular driving.
nissangirl74 wrote:
He's in a CVT. They don't have gears.
I use Xtronic. Pretty lame I know, but the CVT is beyond sluggish in the normal setting unless it's floored passed the "click."

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

Speaking of Nissan making WTF decisions. This one flew under my radar but did you know Nissan hired olympic sprinter Usain Bolt as its "Director of Excitement" and "GT-R brand ambassador" during 2012?? I just read it in Time magazine.

I don't have an ax to grind with Mr. Bolt, but I've never understood why companies keep paying ANY celeb (particularly ones that have absolutely nothing to do with automobiles)to endorse a car. I mean seriously, who's gonna drop $100 grand on a new GT-R just because a guy who can run fast for 100 yards was paid a ton of money and handed a free a car himself says he likes them. I see it as yet another waste of money move in the wrong direction by Nissan.

I suppose it could have been much worse. I would have considered selling my Nissan if they hired Justin Beiber or Jessica Simpson for that position.


Thoughts?

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

I agree 100%. An example of doing it right would be Tony Stewart and Armor All.

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

Rosie O'donnell should be the spokesthing for the crosscabriolet.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

krash wrote:Rosie O'donnell should be the spokesthing for the crosscabriolet.
:lolling:

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

krash wrote:Rosie O'donnell should be the spokesthing for the crosscabriolet.
That is f*** spectacular! :rotflmao :rotfl :rotfl

User avatar
Mr. Music
Posts: 724
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 2:09 pm
Car: 2008 Altima Coupe 2.5S CVT w/ Convenience Package
In the family: '02 S15 Spec R, '09 Rogue
Location: Miami, FL

Post

Maybe we were wrong? Maybe there is hope yet? Check this press release out (source). According to the PDF, Nismo is "to create a range of affordable performance Nissan models from small cars to flagship sports cars." There will be new Nismo models launched every year, starting with the Juke, a new version of the Nismo 370Z, then the GT-R. It doesn't seem like there will be a new sports car like we'd all like to see, but this may bode well for the fun-to-drive factor of several models in Nissan's lineup.

User avatar
Rev_D21
Posts: 5946
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 9:49 pm
Car: 1986.5 D21 LB HD 2WD V6 5Speed
1991 D21 Reg 2WD Auto
1995 D21 Reg 2WD 5Spd
1996 D21 Reg 4WD 5Spd
2012 Versa 1.6S 5-Speed
Location: Somwhere in Western NY
Contact:

Post

Don't hold your breath on that. Nismo used to be something but now it's just plate frames and fart cans. 15 years ago they were awesome but now they are the Pepboys of the Nissan world.

User avatar
RicerX
Moderator
Posts: 2703
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:36 am
Car: '20 Titan Pro4X
Location: Southeastern US

Post

(brace yourselves - lengthy post)

AFAIC, Nissan made up for their decision to bail on the Deltawing by announcing they were entering 24 Hours of Le Mans with a new GT-R. That's cool by me.

As for the rest...

I will say this - while they've been in danger of being boring for a long time, Nissan is quickly approaching the danger of being irrelevant. Toyota (read: Toyota, Lexus, Scion) is boring but they're at least successful with sales numbers and profits, diverse lineups, and high ranking on safety and customer satisfaction surveys.

Nissan is slipping in all those marks. They're working their way toward mediocre.

The way I see it, the Altima is the only vehicle making any money and the only vehicle they're really doing right (save the GT-R and 370). It is also an example on how Nissan's portfolio is in a lot of trouble from a diversity standpoint. While it may not be immediately apparent, here is the situation they're in as I see it.

The Altima has effectively become the elephant in the room. It's ruining the rest of Nissan's passenger car lineup at this point. Yes, a Versa can be had for 10k new, but very few people are buying those - they're buying configurations that are closer to $15/$16k. An Altima S is just above 20k, but a dealer will move one at around 19k on a promo in my town. Why would you buy a vehicle that is half the size and nearly half the power when the alternative has the same fuel economy and is an overall nicer vehicle for a couple thousand more? On top of this scenario even being discuss, how does that bode for the Sentra, which is supposed to be in between these two vehicles? Why does that car even exist at this point?

Speaking of existential crises, wtf is Nissan's plan for the Maxima? At this point, the Maxima doesn't offer amenities that are any different from an Altima 3.5SL. On top of that, it's hardly any larger. It gets worse fuel economy by a few points. It costs thousands more, and when equipped similiarly, the Maxima is nearly 10 grand more than the Altima. Why would anyone buy a Maxima?

Now we're up to three cars in Nissan's lineup that have nearly been deemed irrelevant by the Altima. The idea of having different models occupy different segments is so you have a chunk of models that are diverse and accomodate different needs for different markets. Nissan has blended all the flavors into different sizes of vanilla. You have tall (versa), grande (Sentra), Venti (Altima), and Venti in hard plastic cup that costs $5 more for the same amount of the same drink (Maxima).

On the topic of segment lineups that are stupid, let's talk about Nissan's crossovers. You now have the Murano, Rogue, Juke, and Pathfinder. In my opinion, two vehicles need to be axed completely - the Rogue and the Murano. The Juke and Rogue are way too close together and the Murano and Pathfinder seem to be duking it out for the same slot. The Pathfinder does what the Murano does and does it better and has an extra row of seats. On the other hand, the Rogue is just kind of there. At least the Juke has styling that evokes discussion. They're selling reasonably well. They're probably stealing potential Rogue sales as the vehicles are so close in size. I won't even bother to talk about the pointlessness of the Murano Crossfabriolet. I suppose every company or organization has that one representative that has to exist in its history that people point and laugh at or scream WTF, and much like the current President has Joe Biden, Nissan has the Murano vert thing.

On the subject of Nissan's trucks/large SUV things, Nissan has good stuff here, but they're still in danger of being irrelevant. They need to decide whether or not they're going to play ball in the full size market, and if they're not, they just need to quit. The next Titan (if it's ever coming) needs to be an F150 KILLER. Nothing short. The next Armada, well... not entirely sure if there is a market for it. Toyota is killing the Sequoia, the Tahoe has that segment on lockdown, and I can't even recall anything else in that segment as I don't even know if Ford is making the Expedition anymore.

The Xterra could stand to have a refresh to meet Jeep's Wrangler lineup head on, as it is one of the few remaining true 4WD body-on-frame SUVs left in the US. It needs some love, and it needs to get it, or Nissan needs to just quit here too.

I love the 370Z for what it is, but the competition has more than stepped up since this car was introduced. The 350Z really livened up the market with its return in 2003 and its pricing was very competitive, but look where the sport coupe market has gotten? Since the 370Z was introduced, we have seen the following hit the market:
1) Hyundai Genesis Coupe (simliar power to the Z, but a chunk less in price)
2) Ford Mustang GT revitalized (400+ horsepower for less money than a Z)
3) Dodge Challenger R/T (if that's your thing, and it might be - still a contender)
4) Toyobaru twins (if sacrificing power to save money is your thing)
5) Chevy Camaro SS (400+ horsepower for less money than a Z)
6) BMW 135i (pretty close to the price of a Z)

Those are all big name cars that are stealing Z sales.

None of what I have mentioned so far even takes into account that the Infiniti brand is on life support in my eyes. If I were shopping for a luxury vehicle today, there is nothing in their lineup that would even be on my radar. Competition is far too tough for what they have to offer, especially with Cadillac pitching some heavy hitters into the lower end of the luxury spectrum. There's very little that Infiniti has that even justifies me breaking down their lineup and why each model is in trouble.

As for pairing them up against Toyota, Nissan has nothing as an alternative for the Scion arm, which has been fairly successful since its inception.

With declining reliability ratings, declining customer satisfaction ratings, and an aging product portfolio, I think Nissan is in bigger trouble than they've been in for a long time.

User avatar
VQpwrdSE-R
Posts: 649
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Car: 2005 Code Red Nissan Altima SE-R
2013 Nissan Altima SV
Location: Pennsylvania

Post

XenonSE-R wrote:
Speaking of existential crises, wtf is Nissan's plan for the Maxima? At this point, the Maxima doesn't offer amenities that are any different from an Altima 3.5SL. On top of that, it's hardly any larger. It gets worse fuel economy by a few points. It costs thousands more, and when equipped similiarly, the Maxima is nearly 10 grand more than the Altima. Why would anyone buy a Maxima
I have wondered this same thing, especially since the release of the 2013 altima. When we were shopping we never considered the overpriced maxima and could see spending a few thousand more for a larger altima or the smaller Sentra . The salesman said he just recently had a trade in 2013 altima for a 2013 maxima. The reason being that the guy didn't like the lower mounted navi screen in the altima and missed how his older maxima had a higher mounted screen. Maybe it's fickle people like this that keep the maxima selling units? Is it loyalty to the name from back when the maxima was steps ahead of the altima.

User avatar
nchopp
Posts: 6938
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 5:17 am

Post

Can't speak on the Nissan side, but I'll say this.

A year ago I was stationed in Augusta, GA. Every time I came back to pick up the '02 Q45 from services, the service manager would mention how the mechanics argued over who got to work on it. Typcially at least one or two salesmen would ask if we wanted to trade it in for something new. "Hell. No." The first time we took it in they gave us a G25 as a loaner.

What an utter piece of crap.

I was embarassed for Infiniti. There was pretty much nothing good about that vehicle. The seats were uncomfortable, it was slow, the trim and interior felt cheap... Just awful. I made sure to mention that the next time I take my car in for service, it needs to be an equivalent loaner.

Fast forward two years to Fort Sill, OK. We went up to Bob Moore Infiniti in Oklahoma City to look for a used QX56. No less than FOUR salesmen asked if we were trading in the Q45. Our salesman asked if we would, because he wanted to buy it.

Someone please explain to me why an Infiniti salesman that could easily afford an M56 wants a 10 year old Q45. :wtf2:

It makes me sad, because my first Q (1993), current Q (2002), and this QX56 (2005) are\were great vehicles. Plenty of character, fun to drive, and no major issues. I've put 25,000 miles on the '02 Q within a year and a half; with 1500 mile trips being a lot of those miles. It's an AWESOME cruiser - quiet, ridiculously comfortable, and well-mannered.

P.S. Looked at a new QX56. $88,700. Good luck with that, Infiniti. If I'm going to be spending close to a hundred grand on an SUV, it would be a Mercedes G class or something...

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post


User avatar
Rev_D21
Posts: 5946
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 9:49 pm
Car: 1986.5 D21 LB HD 2WD V6 5Speed
1991 D21 Reg 2WD Auto
1995 D21 Reg 2WD 5Spd
1996 D21 Reg 4WD 5Spd
2012 Versa 1.6S 5-Speed
Location: Somwhere in Western NY
Contact:

Post

Seems we are having a badge war. Clean Drive, Blue Drive, SkyActiv...

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

I found this site where you can enter in search queries and it finds out "what the internet thinks". Its kind of interesting to type things in and see what pops out

Image

Image

Image


Return to “General Chat”