bcar240 wrote:In my experience there are two types of engineers. Those that have a good mechanical aptitude and those that are basically mathematicians. The first type has an intuitive knowledge of how things work and how to make components interact and work together (ability to visualize these things). The math guys are aces at calculus and can throw out calculations that make your head spin. You give these types a problem and they will approach it in very different ways.
...
Excellent summation. I, too, am the mechanical type. I have used a few basic stress equations along with much company history and intelligent assumptions to design fork lift equipment for 8yrs. Throw in a small amount of FEA to reduce stress concentrations withing a design.
However, I spent my 1st 9 years after high school working in a body shop fixing wrecked cars, until I got to the point I wanted more from a career. Went back to college for 4yrs, designed forklift equipment for 8yrs, and jumped at the chance to get back involved with the auto industry. Very little mechanical engineering involved, but the mechanical aptitude is a must in a manufacturing environment.
I must say I miss design greatly, and am a manufacturing/process engineer only because of my love for Datsun/Nissan vehicles.
PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:Pretty much all of the engineers on this board would fall into that category... this isn't the type of place the type 2 brainiacs would hang out...
I agree. I went to school with a few. They are better suited for the Phd market.
Also, new engineering grads beware. Just because you made it through tough education, doesn't mean you are automatically prepared for real world engineering and know all the answers. A lot of the real world was not covered in the equations you learned in school. The main thing you learned, or should have learned, is how to solve problems.