Opening duration isn't everything.compactfean wrote:Usually cars that are built for low end hp will have less peak hp. A motor built for peak hp revs higher but lags until reaching the rpms where the engine starts to be efficient. Example, 280 cams have great power from like 5k -10 or 11k rpms. if your motor can't even reach those rpms than that cam would be way to big for that build.
The 248/248 can pull past 6 no problem. Maybe not in your application because of how you have the cams timing set. You can set them for low/mid/topend power. It all comes down to cam timing more then just installing some cams. I like the 248/248 when they're set right and everything else is set for where you want your power, they seem to put down some serious power. My car has the response of a street bike and topend out the a** while still on a stock IM.FlatBlackIan wrote:Opening duration isn't everything.compactfean wrote:Usually cars that are built for low end hp will have less peak hp. A motor built for peak hp revs higher but lags until reaching the rpms where the engine starts to be efficient. Example, 280 cams have great power from like 5k -10 or 11k rpms. if your motor can't even reach those rpms than that cam would be way to big for that build.
Factory cams are set up strictly for emmisions purposes. Its all about profile, and when the cam is opening, I have seen 314 duration cams designed to make power between 3700 and 8000 rpm. Its all about timing and profile. a factory cam won't close early enough, so a lot of compression is lost. Good for emissions, not for power. Ramp your lift up faster, close sooner, and make good power, or push compression through the roof to support lots of overlap.
Just don't ask it to idle.
To the OP, get a set of 248 S13 intake cams, and stack them, or run a 248 on the exhaust side, and your 232 stock intake cam. Thats the setup I am using now (with 12:1 compression mind you) and I like the power band. It doesn't pull much above 6k, but that keeps me off the rev limit, and I can short shift without issues.
That's because there's some people as different as you over there aswell.asoomal wrote:Go away, no one wants you in the Q45 forums and no one wants you here.

You need reading lessons. I, am not running 248/248, I have 248/232 because I didn't like how peaky the engine was with dual 248s. I wanted more mid range. Peak power is pointless if you have no useable power/torque.N/A Q45 wrote:
The 248/248 can pull past 6 no problem. Maybe not in your application because of how you have the cams timing set. You can set them for low/mid/topend power. It all comes down to cam timing more then just installing some cams. I like the 248/248 when they're set right and everything else is set for where you want your power, they seem to put down some serious power. My car has the response of a street bike and topend out the a** while still on a stock IM.
Do you even know what the word -lifter- means they're not the same thing.asoomal wrote:
That d***...is a lifter, cam follower, bucket, same thing.
FlatBlackIan wrote:You need reading lessons. I, am not running 248/248, I have 248/232 because I didn't like how peaky the engine was with dual 248s. I wanted more mid range. Peak power is pointless if you have no useable power/torque.N/A Q45 wrote:
The 248/248 can pull past 6 no problem. Maybe not in your application because of how you have the cams timing set. You can set them for low/mid/topend power. It all comes down to cam timing more then just installing some cams. I like the 248/248 when they're set right and everything else is set for where you want your power, they seem to put down some serious power. My car has the response of a street bike and topend out the a** while still on a stock IM.
http://www.courtesyparts.com/13231-lift ... 64174.htmlN/A Q45 wrote:Do you even know what the word -lifter- means they're not the same thing.asoomal wrote:
That d***...is a lifter, cam follower, bucket, same thing.
No wonder people get so confused when readinglike yours online.
IT IS NOT A LIFTER!lol-
Why not call them what they are. A shim and bucket design- they don't lift anything. Where as a lifter lifts the rocker arm and helps keep the valve lash to minimum, can get solid and hydraulic lifters that work in that way.
compactfean wrote:Lmao serious head work for 248's? That's barely an upgrade!!! And you have certain settings for your cams for different driving styles? Hahaha!!! I've seen tuners on the dyno fight a engine for even ONE good setting with a pair of cams. Stop kidding yourself.
Stopped playing with slow n/a motors long ago so have fun with that.N/A Q45 wrote:Oh yeah and when you can build a N/A ka that responds like mine then I'll listen to what you have to say compactfean
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ss4UHjl ... ata_player
And this is with a blown rod bearing before I started my aluminum frame build. Engines not done but anyone who knows KAs should be able to notice a huge difference.
asoomal wrote:High HP N/A KA won't be reliable as a turbo and cheap as well.
BTW, do you realize that almost EVERYONE calls them lifters? Hell even Nissan and all the aftermarket companies call them lifters. That definition you is probably from a dictionary during the 60's when most vehicles had push rods.
I bet you pop vessels in your brains when some calls an engine mount a motor mount.
Here's another one:
"appet [ˈtæpɪt]
n
(Engineering / Mechanical Engineering) a mechanical part that reciprocates to receive or transmit intermittent motion, esp the part of an internal-combustion engine that transmits motion from the camshaft to the push rods or valves
[from tap1 + -et]"
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Valve+lifter
In our case, the lifter transmits motion from the cams to the valves.
compactfean wrote:Amen asoomal!!! My 400 hp dd is definately reliable. I don't take video of my car with the rods knocking all the time. how about learn how to build a engine that doesnt do that. Burn!!!
Lol it has a ACT prolight fly wheel 9.5lbs and Exedy stage 2 four puck clutch + a few other things that would just confuse you, you know.asoomal wrote:Who knows...the car in the video you posted probably doesn't have a flywheel bolted up.
You definitely have issues man, and definitely suck at trolling.
I'm guessing that your N/A 240 does 13s right?