Wasted a new Eclipse V6

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

J-Spec Tuner wrote:I do belive cory, but if i were on the road, and saw a random stock 240 and a random stock eclipse GT line up to race, i would put my money on the GT. The numbers favor the GT.

I certainly think the 240sx is a better car though :)


Well, I said SOME of you =) I agree though, like I said, the numbers do favor the GT, but its still close enough where it would still be possible, but I would also bet on the GT.


NIGHTfall_240sx
Posts: 3521
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 9:33 am
Car: Nissan S14 [notchtop SR] SOLD

Post

i love people who say just because they own the car it makes it the fastest... aka Civic owners.....and now, and im sadden to say.. 240 owners.... comon i mean we all know the stock 240 (when in OUR hands) runs 11seconds

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

dude, I can make em run 10's

jrc90240sx
Posts: 455
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:21 am

Post

Man i must have one **** box of a 240 then. ohwell it will be fast one day, then it will bore me and i will have to make it faster. I belive that cory beat the GT, i mean anything is posable. just from my own experince i would not beat one. as i dont beat 99+v6 mustangs - wish i did, would have really pissed off my friend. i am glad to see things come down a little from where they where, and my only remaining question is why cory got ride of a GN i mean there bad ***. laters

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

NIGHTfall_240sx wrote:i love people who say just because they own the car it makes it the fastest... aka Civic owners.....and now, and im sadden to say.. 240 owners.... comon i mean we all know the stock 240 (when in OUR hands) runs 11seconds
Uhm ya, I think youve driven this point numb. I dont think anyone really thinks like that, you are just being ludicrous now. Its not how many cars we lose to, its how many we can beat =)

2sr20de
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 2:22 pm

Post

cory2081 wrote:Driving down the highway and some kid in a lowered Eclipse GT with aftermarket exhaust revs at my 240. All I have, performance-wise, is an Injen intake and Apexi N1 single. He speeds past as he revs and gets several car lengths ahead. Well, naturally I don't take too kindly to that jesture, so, I catch up and get beside him. He drops gears, I put it in 3rd and we hit it. I pulled him by a car from 65 to about 90. Those things have 200HP and 200ft. lbs. What a POS!! It's basically my first race race in my 240. I'm used to killing vettes with my GN, but, I honestly didn't think I'd beat a V6 Eclipse with the 240.


Well... I don't know what good this is to you but I beat a v6 eclipse in my SE-R... I think I just had exaust then... I think those cars must be just dogs... Although car and driver says 15.3... Now that I reflect I think it was an auto... which would explain things...

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

cory does not have the mentality of "cheese master rice boy" you play him out to be, such as making up stuff to look cool. Judging from his previous post content, style of writing, previous cars (GN drooool, how many know-nothing ricers owned a GN? or even that know what it is?). I would say its not even a stretch to believe him.

You guys keep saying its impossible for a fairly stock S14 to beat a stock eclipse GT, but look at those numbers...they are pretty close. I mean if you where to see a race between them just based on those numbers, it would barely be a car length at most me thinks. Then put that race on the street where there are even more factors (there isnt any tree or chance to prepare for example). I dont understand how you can still sit there and say that there is NO WAY EVER a stock or near stock S14 can beat a GT. Sure the chances that the GT would win are higher, but then again, if it wasnt an interesting match up (as it obviously has sparked much interest), I doubt cory would have bothered posting his kill. Like who cares if you raced a Rav4 and won...nobody.

http://www.dragtimes.com/detail.php?ID=1994

1997 240SX (S14a). All this guy has is an N1 dual. 15.34~seconds and there you have it. I bet the next thing you say will be something to the effect that this evidence is not legitimate enough, and to that I say....you will probably never be satisfied then and go through life believing that stock S14s will never beat stock GTs....*shudders* what a horrible life.... :pface

User avatar
tl1000sga
Posts: 702
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 9:53 pm
Car: anything with wheels, and somethings without.

Post

NIGHTfall_240sx wrote:i love people who say just because they own the car it makes it the fastest... aka Civic owners.....and now, and im sadden to say.. 240 owners.... comon i mean we all know the stock 240 (when in OUR hands) runs 11seconds


My stock S14 runs 9's, sometimes I hit low 10's.:rolleyes

Onizuka
Posts: 8450
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 5:24 pm
Car: 91 Nissan S13 coupe SR20DET
89 Nissan S14 hatch SR20DE

Post

aleph1 wrote:http://www.dragtimes.com/detail.php?ID=1994

1997 240SX (S14a). All this guy has is an N1 dual. 15.34~seconds and there you have it. I bet the next thing you say will be something to the effect that this evidence is not legitimate enough, and to that I say....you will probably never be satisfied then and go through life believing that stock S14s will never beat stock GTs....*shudders* what a horrible life.... :pface


well, its hard to judge the legitamacy of that site (and the honesty of the person who submitted the data). From the picture i can see its a base model (hubcaps) and probably doesnt have a LSD. Concidering S14a's are the heaviest of all 240's and dont have any more power than they did 7 or 8 years earlier with much lighter models, im going to have to call BS unless by stock the guy means stock motor with slicks and a LSD. Just my opinion. This thread is going no-where.

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

J-Spec Tuner wrote:well, its hard to judge the legitamacy of that site (and the honesty of the person who submitted the data). From the picture i can see its a base model (hubcaps) and probably doesnt have a LSD. Concidering S14a's are the heaviest of all 240's and dont have any more power than they did 7 or 8 years earlier with much lighter models, im going to have to call BS unless by stock the guy means stock motor with slicks and a LSD. Just my opinion. This thread is going no-where.


You may be right, upon closer inspection of the picture, its seems to be true. I think the time is correct, but I bet he is probably leaving out mods....well, nevermind then. I know its possible for S13s to hit low-mid 15sec, hence why S14s arent cool =) hehehe jk S14 owners, they still rock!

cny_vdub
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 4:44 pm

Post

Ok not that anyone will care etc... My dad has owned a 01 an 02 and now a 03 Eclipse GT V6, two were manuals the other was auto. Now the auto definately be beaten by a mildly good 240sx driver. The stick on the other hand well lets say its a toss up a very good driver could take it no doubt in my mind. But very very close..... its a drivers race...;)

cory2081
Posts: 824
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 9:53 pm
Car: '07 Nissan 350Z
Contact:

Post

As Aleph1 said, why in the world would I post about beating a V6 Eclipse on here if it weren't true?? I almost feel like a lesser person because I am even making the slightest deal about beating a slow *** Eclipse after owning a REAL car ('87 Buick GN) Geez, I beat Z06 Vettes with that car.....now I can barely beat a stupid Eclipse. I'm not trying to brag about my car, hell, it's slow. Big deal, a 2.4 4 banger with intake and exhaust, wow how impressive. NeedCAforS13, you're just pissed b/c your car is slower than mine. I don't have to prove a damn thing to you. Yeah, I owned an '87 Buick GN, it was my first car, drove it to school when I was 15. I think after owning that car for 11 years and buying a '99 Mustang GT as my daily driver for 4 years after building the GN, I should know something. Not only that, I used to go racing with my older brother before I could drive. I know all about racing kiddo, the streets are alot tougher than the strip son. You can only race for 1/4 mile at best on the strip, on the street, you can race as far as you want. I don't give a **** about some time slip b/c I've seen many people get their asses handed to them after bragging about what they ran. I've seen cars that ran faster at the strip get pounded by a slower car on the street. I'm not some damn "ricer", I know my ****.

cory2081
Posts: 824
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 9:53 pm
Car: '07 Nissan 350Z
Contact:

Post

here's a small sample of proof for ya, my GN. The onlt reason I got rid of the car was that I owned it for 11 years and it's just time to build something else. I wanted something lighter, sportier, and RWD. Trust me, my 240 will be putting down some high RWHP in the spring.

elballoonrat
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 2:42 pm
Car: turbo mr2

Post

fat people are dumb and stupid and should never drive cars, what does everyone think about that?

Z3Px
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 4:29 pm
Contact:

Post

where do you live in greenville?!i live in greenwood! and where, did this little bout take place?

cory2081
Posts: 824
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 9:53 pm
Car: '07 Nissan 350Z
Contact:

Post

in Mauldin on 385. I live in Simpsonville man. Glad to hear someone is close by!!

User avatar
tl1000sga
Posts: 702
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 9:53 pm
Car: anything with wheels, and somethings without.

Post

elballoonrat wrote:fat people are dumb and stupid and should never drive cars, what does everyone think about that?


YEAH!!!!!!:D

j/k

Biggs2004
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 7:48 am
Car: 2001 Hyundai XG300
Contact:

Post

I agree, dumb, fat people tend to make some pretty dang slow cars...... they're fun to race though.:)

elballoonrat
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 2:42 pm
Car: turbo mr2

Post

good, now that we're all in accordance the black crow will fly at dawn!!!!!

Z3Px
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 4:29 pm
Contact:

Post

omg, what does that supposed to meen?

User avatar
S13HatchLuvr
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:09 am
Car: 1991 S13 Hatch (white) 5-speed

Post

I'm sure this guy beat the V6 Eclipse... and did so genuinely. I raced a '98 3000GT N/A (218 HP) in my bro's '89 240 with intake, exhaust, SAFCII, and other small mods, and I beat the 3000 (this was the factory SOHC with 90,000 miles, mind you!). It was close, but we beat him definitely. The guy who raced the 3000 was my best friend, and he shifts wonderfully and knows how to hold traction, too. If this guy has the DOHC with mods, that V6 Eclipse would have been owned...

cory2081
Posts: 824
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 9:53 pm
Car: '07 Nissan 350Z
Contact:

Post

My best friend has a 2000 Grand Prix GTP (supercharged) It has 2 1/2" exhaust, 3.4" pulley (11PSI) and a CAI. It runs 9.40's in the 1/8 with some slight spinning. We raced last night just for the hell of it b/c we both wanted to see how the 240 faired against his GTP. Well, he didn;t beat me by much at all. We are going to race again when my header comes this week. Should be a REAL close call. I can't believe my car is so close to his now (and he can't either) The KA just doesn't get the respect it should!!

drifter_for_life06
Posts: 5301
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 5:18 pm
Car: Daily: '16 WRX
Toys: '92 RPS13 400whp
Exocet
Location: SoYoCo, PA

Post

i think he beat that V6 so drop all that No you didnt bull**** and just go by what he says

cory2081
Posts: 824
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 9:53 pm
Car: '07 Nissan 350Z
Contact:

Post

S13HatchLuvr, drifter_for_life06, I guess we have "freaks" since we beat V6 "Weaklipses".... lol. Seriously, I'm really impressed that my car is as fast as it is. I honestly didn't think it would stay right with my friend's GTP like that. The KA rules!! :) haha

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

you do have freaks if you stayed with a GTP that well, I think they run low 15's high 14's factory depending on whether or not it's a freak...

MarkEmark
Posts: 1857
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 6:25 pm
Car: fully-built '95 240sx KA-T
Contact:

Post

There used to be a magazine article from Car and Driver I think on http://www.240sx.org, but they took it away.Anyway, the heavier 95 240sx se did a 7.5 0-60 in that test and a 15.9 sec quarter mile in this article...I'm fairly positive anyhow.

Anyway, GT eclipses are not THAT fast. If you beat him cory, good for you. I absolutely HATE eclipses. Easily one of the ugliest cars out there, and I have a natural distaste for them because three girls that I'm not fond of in the least own them....How can you respect any car whose engineers weren't able to develop a chasis/body that was capable of seating an engine in its engine bay without some unsightly bulge on the hood?!? Talk about an engineering after-thought and gross miscommunication between the engine developers/chasis and body developers.

cory2081
Posts: 824
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 9:53 pm
Car: '07 Nissan 350Z
Contact:

Post

I agree, MarkEmark, Eclipses suck. My ex girlfriend has one, it is always broken and it couldn't fight its way out of a sock. The 240 is far superior in design.....especially looks :) Yeah, my friend's GTP is pretty darn fast. That thing is a torque monster, but, it is heavy. We raced a kid that has an S13 with an SR20DET on the highway with the GTP. He didn't beat us too bad, probably about the same as a new Mustang GT with a couple bolt-ons would. He refused to race us from a light though, he knew the GTP would own him from a light.


Return to “240sx General Discussion”