Post by
SpecDRacing »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/specdracing-u28175.html
Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:21 pm
As the creator of this thread, I need to step in here for a second and help/correct a few things I've read. 1st, if you havent built one, dont work for nissan or have not been factory trained by Nissan, please limit your comments, as I am seeing alot of misleading information here.
ECU will only create a small amount of fuel mileage change. Aerodynamics, tire choice and size, cam phasing and duration along with individual driving charcteristics are what = up to gas mileage. I get up to 30 mpg from my high compression VQ in the white coupe. I get that with and without cam timing operating. The maxima ECM will NOT get you better or worse gas mileage. The HP restriction on the maxima is due to its engine configuration (FWD). The exhaust directions are for emissions, not for power, as with the intake manifold.
Someone asked about pics for the intake manifolds, they are already on this thread. Several pages back.
As for wheel size vs final drive for gas mileage purposes. If you install a taller final drive, you will lose more gas mileage then increasing total tire diameter. I'll break this down for you.
Taller and LIGHTER wheels will increase your one roll footprint. By decreasing weight, we already know we decrease the amount of power needed to turn that object. By increasing size, we can travel farther for any given amount of RPM.
5th gear is 1:1, the final drive in this example is 2:1 and the wheel has a 10 foot roll in one rotation. By the time the engine rotates 10 times, you have traveled 50 ft. Increase total diameter only, and you will add that amount of distance to that RPM.
By changing the final drive, you can can achieve this, but at a cost to the other gears. Overdrive mainly.
The load on the engine is determined by how much work it does with the amount of air and fuel it is using at a particular rpm. So if we are going 70 mph on 20" wheels in 6th gear, lets say we are at 2200 rpm. The wheels weigh the same as factory and the final drive is the same. At this point, we are spliing the load of the larger wheels by the final drive, this decreases the amount of work done by the engine to keep them spinning. This also lets us travel farther on the same crank rotation. Put in a taller final drive, and you will still travel farther on the stock wheels, but the engine will have an increased load over the wheels, due to the same rotational mass being fought by less application of engine torque. Also, the amount of load on the engine durring acceleration (which we do more of in city driving) is inecreased. Its like using a shorter fulcrom to lift the same object. It can move it just as fast, but will require more work.
VQ engines register this load as CAL/LD value in Data Monitor on Consult, which means I get a representation of how much air is being used vs the total amount that could be used. This directly relates to fuel economy, engine performance and idle quality.
The best thing to do is to properly match your tire size, wheel weight and effeciency rpm. This statement directly reflects the higher rpm comment from earlier. At higher RPM, more air is used, therefore, more fuel is used (generaly above 2300 rpm). Depending on the weight of your rotating mass (crank, flywheel, gears, driveshaft, final drive, axles and wheels...even oil viscosity), there will be a point where that weight is useful, and a point where it is hurtful.
VQ's like 1800-2200 rpm for fuel ecomonmy. It is no suprise that this is where the rotating mass also works well at a 1:1 or overdrive ratio. The less things weigh, the more this will change, but dont forget that too light and you loose momentum. The heavy flywheel in the Z is usefull in keeping things spinning at any sustained rpm.
Objects in motion tend to stay in motion. That directly relates to mas and fluctuation of velocity.
I could write about this for hours, but this is a thread for the VQ swap. I mean not to flame here, but if your not talking about a VQ swap, please start a new thread.