LOL I WAS JUST GONNA POST THATHashiriyaS14 wrote:
Awesome, btw.
It's a real functioning ALS, not something like the Bee*R rev limiter?
IDK what you mean, can you elaborate?HashiriyaS14 wrote: It's a real functioning ALS, not something like the Bee*R rev limiter?
That's basically why I set mine up, although I do go to the drag strip quite a bit, and this will REALLY help there. Other than at the drag strip, I'll just use it to screw with ricers and scare old lady's. Using it is hard on the turbo and exhaust valves, so I'm not exactly going to be activating it on a daily basis.kouki munster wrote:I keep wanting to setup the launch control feature in my haltech, I doubt that I will ever use it, but it will be fun to f*** with people with it. (it even has a rally anti-lag feature that would be entertaining to fiddle with)
LOL! Gotta love Dave, our resident Red-Neck.duffman1278 wrote:Giiiiit er dun wit striklend propane!
Um, OK? because it's not an SR?RCA wrote:Wait, that is a 1.8L...
You are going to let allot of people down...
It's built into the SDS. The revs that the motor can attain and the amount of timing retard are programmable. When I actually go to use it at the track, I probably won't set it up to have it pop that much. That much exhaust pressure sends the boost pressure through the roof and makes it hard to control your launch. In practice, I'll run more revs and less timing retard to attain the amount of power I need to launch and not bog. It's easier on the motor and much more predictable. I basically set it up like that for the video and because it's fun. From a wiring standpoint the SDS is looking for +12v coming into a pin on the ECU. The anti-lag is setup so that when I flip a switch, and depress the clutch, the system will activate. I'm thinking about trying to attach a momentary switch to the shifter because the way it is now, I have to quickly de-activate it after I launch but before I shift into second, OR not push the pedal all the way. Either way it's a bit of a pain the way it's wired now and I'm going to change it.kouki munster wrote:Just out of curiosity, what are you using to setup the anti-lag?
You wouldn't get it.PoorManQ45 wrote:I don't get it.
You're proud that you're dumping a massive amount of fuel in to the exhaust?
I would slap you in the back of the head for getting that crap on the wall if I were the shop owner.
No, because it is going to make ALL that noise and it won't be making much power.People will probably be expecting something fast. ALS on an LS1 never disappointsfloat_6969 wrote:Um, OK? because it's not an SR?
My thoughts exactly.numbnuts240 wrote:well it produces more hp in stock form than the ka does, so i don't see why it wouldn't be enough motor for an s14.
Seriously. Are you stupid? Having the exhaust ports open with unburnt fuel, factoring in inertia, means you are forcing that fuel in to the exhaust. Therefore you are "dumping massive amounts of fuel in to the exhaust"float_6969 wrote:You wouldn't get it.
I'm not dumping massive amounts of fuel into the exhaust. I'm firing the sparkplug ATDC so that the combustion process is still occurring when the exhaust valve opens.
Its good to see that we are on the same page when it comes to what the main use for an anti lag launch control system is.float_6969 wrote:That's basically why I set mine up, although I do go to the drag strip quite a bit, and this will REALLY help there. Other than at the drag strip, I'll just use it to screw with ricers and scare old lady's. Using it is hard on the turbo and exhaust valves, so I'm not exactly going to be activating it on a daily basis. LOL! Gotta love Dave, our resident Red-Neck.
The point is so you can build significant boost pressure on an engine with no load on it.(like sitting at a starting line waiting for the lights to drop)PoorManQ45 wrote:What is the point?
Not to mention gaskets and cracked manifolds. ALS isn't for motors that dont get rebuilt every couple hundred miles.Speedy7_7 wrote:Anti lag is different, and not used by people who daily drive their cars. If you have anti-lag in your ECU, ignore it, unless you want to be replacing turbos like tires.
Yup. A forced induction LS1 using a two-step never disappoints, but a CA.... ehDrifterXRPS13 wrote:why would you need als on an ls motor? i thought they are only really setup for forced induction, mainly turbocharging.
float_6969 wrote:If you slapped me in the back of the head, I'd through you through that wall with the black stuff on it.
A completely stock CA makes about 20hp more than a KA. My motor isn't anywhere near stock. Right now it makes about 200RWHP. That is with a turbo that's smaller than an SR T25. The CA is also lighter than the KA and the SR and sits further back in the engine bay than the KA or the SR. If you've ever seen a CA swapped S13 or S14 with stock springs, the front of the car sits way up in the air due to the lack of weight on the front end. The CA is capable of making just as much HP as an SR or a KA is.Chaotic_Warlord wrote:Is the CA enough motor for the S14, after all it is heavier than the S13's and 180's are. Granted it's .2L smaller than the SR, but displacement is one of those power factors that people like to look at. Then again you can probably pick up used CA18's for a fraction of the price of an SR.
Why won't it be making power? The whole point of this system is to increase the power when you launch the car so that it doesn't bog off the line.RCA wrote:No, because it is going to make ALL that noise and it won't be making much power.People will probably be expecting something fast. ALS on an LS1 never disappoints.
As has been stated, this isn't an anti-lag setup, but a launch control setup. IDK why I posted it saying anti-lag. I suppose I could program it to work like an anti-lag setup if I kept the throttle open during shifts, but once again, this isn't something that you'd want to use on a regular basis. I'll mostly use it for when I'm at the 1/4 mile for the launch. Also, a launch control system can be used on any motor. It's primary purpose is to give you enough power off the line in a drag race to keep the motor from bogging down and giving you a good launch.DrifterXRPS13 wrote:why would you need als on an ls motor? i thought they are only really setup for forced induction, mainly turbocharging.
You're right, it's not anti-lag. IDK why I posted it that way.Speedy7_7 wrote:Sorry, thats not anti lag. Cool though
Launch Control, anti lag is during shifts.
And to Poorman, I can understand what your saying, it would be useless for almost anyone. The launch control just limits the rpms so that you can be foot to the floor and not get terrible wheelspin, it also spools the turbo prior to launch.
Anti lag is different, and not used by people who daily drive their cars. If you have anti-lag in your ECU, ignore it, unless you want to be replacing turbos like tires.
Yup. See above. I'm dumb.FlatBlackIan wrote:This is basically just a 2 step rev limiter, but the truth is, there is very little difference. A 2 step can cut spark, or it can force the spark to fire late. Antilag does the same thing, while also firing the fuel injectors on the exhaust stroke.
Man, what's with all the CA hate?RCA wrote:Yup. A forced induction LS1 using a two-step never disappoints, but a CA.... eh
Yeah, its a little weird that they consider the .2L from an SR to be something so significant, but the fact that a KAT is .4L more then the SR is only a small factor to consider.float_6969 wrote:Man, what's with all the CA hate?