Vid of my Launch Control Setup (title corrected)

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17369
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post



User avatar
IanS
Posts: 9758
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:07 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX, 2010 Subaru Forester XT, 2004 Infiniti G35 Coupe.
Location: Esko, MN
Contact:

Post

[Japanese accent]OOOooooh Misfiring system[/Japanese accent]

FTMFW.

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post



Awesome, btw.

It's a real functioning ALS, not something like the Bee*R rev limiter?

User avatar
kouki munster
Posts: 2195
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:13 pm
Car: 97 base 240
Location: Anderson, SC

Post

I keep wanting to setup the launch control feature in my haltech, I doubt that I will ever use it, but it will be fun to f*** with people with it. (it even has a rally anti-lag feature that would be entertaining to fiddle with)

User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

Sounds like hell...

I like it.

User avatar
asoomal
Posts: 2374
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:45 pm
Car: 2001 Subaru Impreza L 5MT (Daily)
1992 Nissan 240SX SE 5MT w/HICAS (Being restored)
Location: Canada

Post

HashiriyaS14 wrote:

Awesome, btw.

It's a real functioning ALS, not something like the Bee*R rev limiter?
LOL I WAS JUST GONNA POST THAT

duffman1278
Posts: 6816
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:09 pm
Car: 89 240sx Hatch, the wildcats!

Post

Giiiiit er dun wit striklend propane!

User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

Wait, that is a 1.8L...

You are going to let allot of people down...

User avatar
kouki munster
Posts: 2195
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:13 pm
Car: 97 base 240
Location: Anderson, SC

Post

Just out of curiosity, what are you using to setup the anti-lag?

User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

I don't get it.

You're proud that you're dumping a massive amount of fuel in to the exhaust?

I would slap you in the back of the head for getting that crap on the wall if I were the shop owner.

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17369
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

HashiriyaS14 wrote: It's a real functioning ALS, not something like the Bee*R rev limiter?
IDK what you mean, can you elaborate?
kouki munster wrote:I keep wanting to setup the launch control feature in my haltech, I doubt that I will ever use it, but it will be fun to f*** with people with it. (it even has a rally anti-lag feature that would be entertaining to fiddle with)
That's basically why I set mine up, although I do go to the drag strip quite a bit, and this will REALLY help there. Other than at the drag strip, I'll just use it to screw with ricers and scare old lady's. Using it is hard on the turbo and exhaust valves, so I'm not exactly going to be activating it on a daily basis.
duffman1278 wrote:Giiiiit er dun wit striklend propane!
LOL! Gotta love Dave, our resident Red-Neck.
RCA wrote:Wait, that is a 1.8L...

You are going to let allot of people down...
Um, OK? because it's not an SR?
kouki munster wrote:Just out of curiosity, what are you using to setup the anti-lag?
It's built into the SDS. The revs that the motor can attain and the amount of timing retard are programmable. When I actually go to use it at the track, I probably won't set it up to have it pop that much. That much exhaust pressure sends the boost pressure through the roof and makes it hard to control your launch. In practice, I'll run more revs and less timing retard to attain the amount of power I need to launch and not bog. It's easier on the motor and much more predictable. I basically set it up like that for the video and because it's fun. From a wiring standpoint the SDS is looking for +12v coming into a pin on the ECU. The anti-lag is setup so that when I flip a switch, and depress the clutch, the system will activate. I'm thinking about trying to attach a momentary switch to the shifter because the way it is now, I have to quickly de-activate it after I launch but before I shift into second, OR not push the pedal all the way. Either way it's a bit of a pain the way it's wired now and I'm going to change it.
PoorManQ45 wrote:I don't get it.

You're proud that you're dumping a massive amount of fuel in to the exhaust?

I would slap you in the back of the head for getting that crap on the wall if I were the shop owner.
You wouldn't get it.

I'm not dumping massive amounts of fuel into the exhaust. I'm firing the sparkplug ATDC so that the combustion process is still occurring when the exhaust valve opens.

If you slapped me in the back of the head, I'd through you through that wall with the black stuff on it. The guy making the vid is the shop owner. The black stuff on the wall is from the HUNDREDS of other cars that have been dyno'd there, not my 10 seconds of anti-lag. I do some of the tuning for the owner and that's where I work on my car at as well.

User avatar
DrifterXRPS13
Posts: 12391
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 4:14 am
Car: 1993 Acura Integra LS, 1998 Nissan 240SX SE 5sp. KA-T,2004 Honda CBR 600RR, 2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600, 2013 Harley Davidson Iron 883, 2014 BMW S1000RR
Location: Vernon Hills, IL
Contact:

Post

SWEET!!! i so wanted to do this but i'm not sticking with turbos anymore....but nice job and continued luck!

User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

i've always wanted to see a ca in an s14, just the idea of it is bad a** because no one does it. i love those engines.

User avatar
Steady_One_S13
Posts: 2168
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:42 am
Car: 1991 SR'd 240sx S13, 1993 Toyota SW21 Mr2...
Location: 915
Contact:

Post

Yeah, that was sick!

Scare and beat them ricers!

User avatar
Chaotic_Warlord
Posts: 4804
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 8:31 am
Car: Black 5 speed Swapped 1995 240sx
Location: Killadelphia PA
Contact:

Post

Is the CA enough motor for the S14, after all it is heavier than the S13's and 180's are. Granted it's .2L smaller than the SR, but displacement is one of those power factors that people like to look at. Then again you can probably pick up used CA18's for a fraction of the price of an SR.

User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

well it produces more hp in stock form than the ka does, so i don't see why it wouldn't be enough motor for an s14.

User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

float_6969 wrote:Um, OK? because it's not an SR?
No, because it is going to make ALL that noise and it won't be making much power.People will probably be expecting something fast. ALS on an LS1 never disappoints

Also what is an SR?
numbnuts240 wrote:well it produces more hp in stock form than the ka does, so i don't see why it wouldn't be enough motor for an s14.
My thoughts exactly.

User avatar
DrifterXRPS13
Posts: 12391
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 4:14 am
Car: 1993 Acura Integra LS, 1998 Nissan 240SX SE 5sp. KA-T,2004 Honda CBR 600RR, 2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600, 2013 Harley Davidson Iron 883, 2014 BMW S1000RR
Location: Vernon Hills, IL
Contact:

Post

why would you need als on an ls motor? i thought they are only really setup for forced induction, mainly turbocharging.

User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

float_6969 wrote:You wouldn't get it.

I'm not dumping massive amounts of fuel into the exhaust. I'm firing the sparkplug ATDC so that the combustion process is still occurring when the exhaust valve opens.
Seriously. Are you stupid? Having the exhaust ports open with unburnt fuel, factoring in inertia, means you are forcing that fuel in to the exhaust. Therefore you are "dumping massive amounts of fuel in to the exhaust"

You are wasting fuel and power. What is the point?

How does this setup help you?


User avatar
Morph
Posts: 2520
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 9:02 pm
Car: 91 Sr Powered Coupe

Post

Whats the title of the Video? I cant pull up You Tube directly but i can workaround it through embeded files.

User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

S14 CA18DET SDS EM4F Anti Lag

User avatar
Speedy7_7
Posts: 979
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 6:20 am
Car: 2002 IS300 And 2008 Nissan Versa
Location: Partytown, USA

Post

Sorry, thats not anti lag. Cool though

Launch Control, anti lag is during shifts.

And to Poorman, I can understand what your saying, it would be useless for almost anyone. The launch control just limits the rpms so that you can be foot to the floor and not get terrible wheelspin, it also spools the turbo prior to launch.

Anti lag is different, and not used by people who daily drive their cars. If you have anti-lag in your ECU, ignore it, unless you want to be replacing turbos like tires.

User avatar
kouki munster
Posts: 2195
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:13 pm
Car: 97 base 240
Location: Anderson, SC

Post

float_6969 wrote:That's basically why I set mine up, although I do go to the drag strip quite a bit, and this will REALLY help there. Other than at the drag strip, I'll just use it to screw with ricers and scare old lady's. Using it is hard on the turbo and exhaust valves, so I'm not exactly going to be activating it on a daily basis. LOL! Gotta love Dave, our resident Red-Neck.
Its good to see that we are on the same page when it comes to what the main use for an anti lag launch control system is.
PoorManQ45 wrote:What is the point?
The point is so you can build significant boost pressure on an engine with no load on it.(like sitting at a starting line waiting for the lights to drop)


User avatar
flohtingPoint
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 pm
Car: 2004 Z16 Corvette Z06
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post

Speedy7_7 wrote:Anti lag is different, and not used by people who daily drive their cars. If you have anti-lag in your ECU, ignore it, unless you want to be replacing turbos like tires.
Not to mention gaskets and cracked manifolds. ALS isn't for motors that dont get rebuilt every couple hundred miles.

User avatar
Speedy7_7
Posts: 979
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 6:20 am
Car: 2002 IS300 And 2008 Nissan Versa
Location: Partytown, USA

Post

Ding ding ding.

there is a reason only racecars use certain things.

User avatar
IanS
Posts: 9758
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:07 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX, 2010 Subaru Forester XT, 2004 Infiniti G35 Coupe.
Location: Esko, MN
Contact:

Post

[QUOTE=Speedy7_7]Sorry, thats not anti lag. Cool though

Launch Control, anti lag is during shifts.

And to Poorman, I can understand what your saying, it would be useless for almost anyone. The launch control just limits the rpms so that you can be foot to the floor and not get terrible wheelspin, it also spools the turbo prior to launch.

Anti lag is different, and not used by people who daily drive their cars. If you have anti-lag in your ECU, ignore it, unless you want to be replacing turbos like tires.[/QUOTE

This is basically just a 2 step rev limiter, but the truth is, there is very little difference. A 2 step can cut spark, or it can force the spark to fire late. Antilag does the same thing, while also firing the fuel injectors on the exhaust stroke.

User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

DrifterXRPS13 wrote:why would you need als on an ls motor? i thought they are only really setup for forced induction, mainly turbocharging.
Yup. A forced induction LS1 using a two-step never disappoints, but a CA.... eh

User avatar
Doya
Posts: 1245
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:30 am
Car: '95 240sx KA-T
Location: MD

Post

float_6969 wrote:If you slapped me in the back of the head, I'd through you through that wall with the black stuff on it.

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17369
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

Chaotic_Warlord wrote:Is the CA enough motor for the S14, after all it is heavier than the S13's and 180's are. Granted it's .2L smaller than the SR, but displacement is one of those power factors that people like to look at. Then again you can probably pick up used CA18's for a fraction of the price of an SR.
A completely stock CA makes about 20hp more than a KA. My motor isn't anywhere near stock. Right now it makes about 200RWHP. That is with a turbo that's smaller than an SR T25. The CA is also lighter than the KA and the SR and sits further back in the engine bay than the KA or the SR. If you've ever seen a CA swapped S13 or S14 with stock springs, the front of the car sits way up in the air due to the lack of weight on the front end. The CA is capable of making just as much HP as an SR or a KA is.
RCA wrote:No, because it is going to make ALL that noise and it won't be making much power.People will probably be expecting something fast. ALS on an LS1 never disappoints.
Why won't it be making power? The whole point of this system is to increase the power when you launch the car so that it doesn't bog off the line.
DrifterXRPS13 wrote:why would you need als on an ls motor? i thought they are only really setup for forced induction, mainly turbocharging.
As has been stated, this isn't an anti-lag setup, but a launch control setup. IDK why I posted it saying anti-lag. I suppose I could program it to work like an anti-lag setup if I kept the throttle open during shifts, but once again, this isn't something that you'd want to use on a regular basis. I'll mostly use it for when I'm at the 1/4 mile for the launch. Also, a launch control system can be used on any motor. It's primary purpose is to give you enough power off the line in a drag race to keep the motor from bogging down and giving you a good launch.
Speedy7_7 wrote:Sorry, thats not anti lag. Cool though

Launch Control, anti lag is during shifts.

And to Poorman, I can understand what your saying, it would be useless for almost anyone. The launch control just limits the rpms so that you can be foot to the floor and not get terrible wheelspin, it also spools the turbo prior to launch.

Anti lag is different, and not used by people who daily drive their cars. If you have anti-lag in your ECU, ignore it, unless you want to be replacing turbos like tires.
You're right, it's not anti-lag. IDK why I posted it that way.

Yea, this isn't something that you want to use on a regular basis. When I use it, I'll program it so it doesn't backfire out of the exhaust like that. I just did it for S & G's. It makes WAY too much boost when it's setup like that and will cause all kinds of wheelspin.
FlatBlackIan wrote:This is basically just a 2 step rev limiter, but the truth is, there is very little difference. A 2 step can cut spark, or it can force the spark to fire late. Antilag does the same thing, while also firing the fuel injectors on the exhaust stroke.
Yup. See above. I'm dumb.
RCA wrote:Yup. A forced induction LS1 using a two-step never disappoints, but a CA.... eh
Man, what's with all the CA hate?

User avatar
Red coupe
Posts: 12216
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:51 pm
Car: 92 Nissan 240sx Coupe

Post

float_6969 wrote:Man, what's with all the CA hate?
Yeah, its a little weird that they consider the .2L from an SR to be something so significant, but the fact that a KAT is .4L more then the SR is only a small factor to consider.


Return to “General Chat”