Just by swapping the crank and pistons of a vh45 into vh41 still wouldn't make it any more reliable under boost and more hp though would it? Aren't there other differences? By the way this is a usdm vh41 i have.SuperHatch wrote:Motor mounts are in a different location and the bellhousing to engine bolt pattern is different. Sumps are the same shape, so crossmember clearance shouldn't be an issue. I'm not sure if the bell length is the same between the two cars, but if it is you can use the VH45 bell on your stock trans, then use whichever torque converter you'd like.
If you're really interested in this swap I could do it for you.
Another option is to put a VH45 crank and pistons into your VH41 to make it 4.5L. I have a spare 97 VH41 block that I could build to 4.5L if you'd like.
The cradle from the 45 can be put in a 41 if you use the 45 main bolts... The JDM 41's have girdles.maxnix wrote:VH41DE don't have the cradle reinforcement.
For supercharging, I always thought the 1996 VH45DE would be best to tune, but you would have to provide the ECM or crack the OEM ECM encryption. I think the cam lift and timing is different also.
Could be a whole lot of money to do it right.
That's how all unfinished projects start.jarred15801 wrote:Why would it be much cheaper? With supercharging you don't have to run an intercooler or redo the exhaust. Just supercharger, intake tube, bracket, couple oil lines, belts, and pullies. I would imagine we would be able too. He tunes pretty much everything, is a teacher at Wyotech in Blairsville, PA, has his own shop and some other s*** too.
That's true i haven't built a boosted car but my friends that would help me have done a bunch now. It seems to me when i look at it that supercharging would be much easier then turbo charging, alot less to deal with. I don't see why it's almost mandatory for an aftercooler? For a turbocharger i see why, but why needed on a supercharger? They don't get nearly as hot do they? I allready have exhaust work done, maybe just have to do somthign with the exhaust manifolds, but i still believe that would be cheaper then getting alot of hard bends and welds done to route to a turbo.AZhitman wrote:
That's how all unfinished projects start.
The word "just" in there tells me you've never built a boosted car, and an aftercooler of some sort is almost mandatory, as is changing the exhaust, if only to allow for better flow.
If you want the main bearing beam, get one from a 45, get the main bolts from a 45, drop the pan, pull the stock main bolts, then put in the beam with the new bolts and follow the factory torque sequence.jarred15801 wrote:
That's true i haven't built a boosted car but my friends that would help me have done a bunch now. It seems to me when i look at it that supercharging would be much easier then turbo charging, alot less to deal with. I don't see why it's almost mandatory for an aftercooler? For a turbocharger i see why, but why needed on a supercharger? They don't get nearly as hot do they? I allready have exhaust work done, maybe just have to do somthign with the exhaust manifolds, but i still believe that would be cheaper then getting alot of hard bends and welds done to route to a turbo.
Because it can.jarred15801 wrote:No im not ready to spend 10k. How could it even come close to costing that much?
I agree my transmisson could be working a lil better, but isn't a Level 10 overkill if im just looking for 350rwhp. I found a Q transmission out of a 2000 with 30k miles for $150 bucks by the way. I was planning on buying that.AZhitman wrote:100K miles on a Q transmission means you're past-due.
$3K+ just for a good reman from Level 10, and that's not including an upgraded torque converter (you'll need that).
I belive you guys, i'm not trying to be an a** about anything. And i know you guys have more knowledge on this matter then i do. Just trying to figure some things out and find out how it could be so expensive.Carl H wrote:hondas can be tuned with a salad fork and a ball of twine...there are so many different honda rom tuning programs its not even funny.heres a serious tip, go buy maximum boost by corky bell and have a good read...then come back and tell us you want to do this and are willing to spend the coin to do it right.
to supercharge the vh i'd put material cost for parts and raw materials at atleast 5-6k for good parts.to turbo i'd say 2-3k...then again i have been building cars and tuning them for almost 5 years now.
That's 150 MORE rwhp than you have. If you have 100K miles, you may even be lower than that.jarred15801 wrote:
I agree my transmisson could be working a lil better, but isn't a Level 10 overkill if im just looking for 350rwhp. I found a Q transmission out of a 2000 with 30k miles for $150 bucks by the way. I was planning on buying that.