Post by
wishihadas14 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/wishihadas14-u77590.html
Mon Feb 11, 2008 2:46 pm
I have been thinking about this myself for quite some time and have looked into a fair amount. Porsche has been using twin VGT's for awhile on their flat-6's, but I don't know what size or if it could push enough psi to produce high hp numbers since I couldn't find any compressor maps. Acura's new RDX uses what they call a Variable Flow Turbocharger that does essentially the same thing, through a different method. It has a variable flow nozzle inlet instead of the many vanes needed in a regular VGT, which cuts down on the complexity and moving parts required. I like this in theory too, but that turbo was designed to produce near-instant boost on a 2.3L and produces 13 psi. max (in stock form) but only 8 psi. after 4500 rpm. Again, I have been unable to find compressor maps, and as the displacement is relatively close I assume it is reasonably sized for a KA or SR, I doubt that the cost of buying an OEM Acura turbo for a brand new model would be prohibitive and the chance of not producing enough peak boost would outweigh the advantages of quicker response for full race applications. IMO, until we see some aftermarket turbos, these will just not be plausible because anyone who wants to spend that much on a turbo probably wants high hp/tq numbers and the truth is that a properly sized turbo will not lag all that much for the intended application and that a twin-scroll setup or v-mount intercooler (two also very costly options) can reduce lag by a significant amount. Sorry this post is so long. What I concluded after my research is that right now VGT/VFT is just not worth it as an aftermarket build, but that if these big-name turbo suppliers start to produce VGT/VFT's in sizes for all types of motors and applications, then we will likely see this to be advantageous, though cost prohibitive.