+1shift_mikey wrote:
MAN i am getting SICK and tired of this statement.
you can install turbo on a single cylinder lawnmower if you want to!Hell they even make little mini rubber band driven superchargers for nitro powered R/C cars! With enough money/skill you can make anything work.
I don't care WHAT show cars have the NISSAN CVT and a TURBO. i want to see DAILY DRIVERS with this stuff installed. YOU HAVE no facts, NO PROOF that the XTRONIC CVT will hold up to high horsepower for an extended period of time.
If a company offers you a turbo then please do it, i WANT you to prove me wrong! but don't start talking out your @$$ without real facts.
and you have no proof that the CVT won't take the power, if you hate that statement then boo hoo. i dont think Nissan or any car company will make a transmission that isn't strong enough for whats thrown at it. if you read around and do some research you'll realize that CVT's are now being used on HEAVY DUTY vehicles with A LOT of torque. older CVT's used a chain. the XTRONIC CVT uses a pully and a belt. just like belt driven superchargers rev hard and fast the CVT BELT should be ABLE to tkae the powershift_mikey wrote:
MAN i am getting SICK and tired of this statement.
you can install turbo on a single cylinder lawnmower if you want to!Hell they even make little mini rubber band driven superchargers for nitro powered R/C cars! With enough money/skill you can make anything work.
I don't care WHAT show cars have the NISSAN CVT and a TURBO. i want to see DAILY DRIVERS with this stuff installed. YOU HAVE no facts, NO PROOF that the XTRONIC CVT will hold up to high horsepower for an extended period of time.
If a company offers you a turbo then please do it, i WANT you to prove me wrong! but don't start talking out your @$$ without real facts.
if you look at the comment i replied to, where does it say anything about extended period of time? it said if CVT would take a Turbo and i said yes it's been done. did i claim that you could go 500,000 miles with turbo in a CVT vehicle? NO i did not. so i have "PROOF" that CVT can take turbo because it has been done before.... so i'm not just "talking out my ***"shift_mikey wrote:
MAN i am getting SICK and tired of this statement.
you can install turbo on a single cylinder lawnmower if you want to!Hell they even make little mini rubber band driven superchargers for nitro powered R/C cars! With enough money/skill you can make anything work.
I don't care WHAT show cars have the NISSAN CVT and a TURBO. i want to see DAILY DRIVERS with this stuff installed. YOU HAVE no facts, NO PROOF that the XTRONIC CVT will hold up to high horsepower for an extended period of time.
If a company offers you a turbo then please do it, i WANT you to prove me wrong! but don't start talking out your @$$ without real facts.
yes, you are 100% correct, i do not have any proof that these nissan CVT's WON'T take silly amounts of horse power.TheBourneAltimatum wrote:
and you have no proof that the CVT won't take the power, if you hate that statement then boo hoo. i dont think Nissan or any car company will make a transmission that isn't strong enough for whats thrown at it. if you read around and do some research you'll realize that CVT's are now being used on HEAVY DUTY vehicles with A LOT of torque. older CVT's used a chain. the XTRONIC CVT uses a pully and a belt. just like belt driven superchargers rev hard and fast the CVT BELT should be ABLE to tkae the power
I actually agree with your original statement. For one, in all of my research, I have yet to find a specific model number for the CVT used in the Altima coupe. Does anyone know for sure that this CVT is the same as used in the Murano?shift_mikey wrote:
yes, you are 100% correct, i do not have any proof that these nissan CVT's WON'T take silly amounts of horse power.
I do need to correct you though...... A/C CVT uses a steel belt that is driven by smooth pulleys. It uses friction between the pulley and the clutch to transfer its power. Super chargers commonly use a GROOVED belt which is just like a flexible chain. Also, superchargers don't require nearly the amount of torque to move as a 3200lbs car does.Trucks that use CVTs, have CVT's designed to handle large amounts of torque. The CVT mounted to the 3.5 was built with a certian HP/TQ in mind. Construction equipment has been using CVT's for a long time, however they are HYDROSTATIC. I've rebuilt a few, they are pretty nifty and i highly recommend it LOL.I was really hoping that nissan CVT would have been hydrostatic, but i guess for high speed applications, its not as practical as it is for pure torque.
I'm sorry i came off like that, i'm not trying to be a prick. I just feel that people that go around making claims need to be able to put their money where their mouth is.
I hope the transmission can take double the horsepower it does now! and do it for years!
No hard feelings, i'm one of you guys.
AND I WANT BOOST ON MY CVT TOO!!!
So far, I've found this:http://www.nissan-global.com/E...a.pdfshift_mikey wrote:Nissan does have a site that has info about their "technologies", nothing i explored deep enough to see if it contained that kinda info. When i e-mailed nissan corporate asking for power handling specs of the CVT, they told me to contact the local dealer yeah any good that would do
ppazz1101 wrote: If you guys are simply going off of the fact that they had a GT-C concept Murano that was turbocharged, then there's no way you can use that to speak to the strength of the CVT. Concept cars should never be used to compare with production cars when speaking about technology. Ever.
Well that might be me then. I have a friend that works at a machine shop. I was planning on getting the kit as soon as summer hit and letting artisan install it (if they would). I'm only 4hours from houston so it wouldnt be a bad trip.08altima35 wrote:damn. this thread has turned into a cvt debate. i expected that. i received word that the same artisan turbo kit on the 6mt will also fit with the cvt, but the down pipe will have to be modified. also, they're not sure if the cvt will hold up to any drastic power increases so.... we'll all just have to wait until someone decides to boost there cvt and see what happens.
People have been cryotreating auto parts for years. If you're talking about engine internals, you should still get forged pistons and rods.TheBourneAltimatum wrote:600hppot found this yesterday. what do you guys think http://www.nitrofreeze.com/racing.html
Modified by TheBourneAltimatum at 10:59 AM 2/23/2008
OOPS didn't mean to sound like an a-hole on the above comment its just that I saw the art that it said nissan and for some reason my brain ignored the Extroid toroidal CVT part.And now commence with the mocking.adidas2go wrote:
Thats a Toroidal CVT...
The XTRONIC is a Pulley-based system that DOES use a belt, as shown in the link below...
http://www.cutawaycreations.co...arged
Not to be mean, but you're way off in some of your info there. I'll address that and your questions.600hppot wrote:it would be useful to know exactly what kind of internals nissan uses in the VQ. maybe they already come cryo treated from the factory? I'm pretty sure they're not forged, which means they're cast, and to safely handle 270 mules, those cast parts better be something special. as you all probably don't know, just dropping your average cast piston on the ground will crack it, they're that brittle. Heck, the average cast piston is composed of up to 25% silicon (glass).
Cryo treating greatly reduces a cast part's brittleness (makes the part 3-4 times stronger). And it's cheap to boot. ~$10 per piston (whereas a set of forged will cost anywhere from 500 to 1000).
But we're just talking about pistons. It's actually a lot more vital to get stronger rods and a stronger crankshaft, as they're usually the first components to give under stress.
now im not an expert, i dont know if it's better to get forged or cryo'd casts for an engine going from 270 to ~450 hp. if it was going upwards of 600 hp, id definately go for forged. you don't wanna take risks above 600 ponies.
as for the cvt, why wouldn't it benefit like any other transmission? you're making the parts a lot more resistant to stress. The belt still has the same chance of slipping, but at least the parts are beefed up.
i dont believe there were many changes in the bottom end of this VQ compared to the 350z VQ. its the same basically, just a little stronger. nissan did however use a different head and intake cam which gives it the increase in power.08altima35 wrote:before we go too much further with all this, does anyone know how the 3.5 a/c internals match up to the 350z internals. i've seen a boosted 350z at the track that the owner claimed to throw down 475 hp to the ground with stock rods, pistons, crank, flywheel, and clutch and had no trouble through 15,000 miles and he ran the 1/8th mile track from time to time. is there any difference in the a/c and 350z rods and pistons?
no offense taken, i know im not an expert.ppazz1101 wrote:Not to be mean, but you're way off in some of your info there. I'll address that and your questions.
First, forged > cryo treatment. If you plan on running 450 HP, you better go forged. Cryo treated cast internals will not hold up to 450 HP. Cryo treating simply makes the molecular structure more uniform and dense. It increases tensile strength and wear resistance... but it comes nowhere near the strength of forged parts. Forged internals for this application will not need to be cryo treated. They'll hold more power than anyone here will ever produce on their VQ35.
Second, the crankshaft is usually the last part to go. Rods and pistons are some of the first parts, but don't forget about the value in using aftermarket valve springs and valves when reving to a higher RPM (especially if you're changing the powerband). Crankshafts, even cast, are usually quite strong. It's also part of the nature of the stress put on them. I would guesstimate that you're fine on the stock crank until you get into the 600 HP range.
(Side note: Some people were talking about camshafts. Cams do not need to be replaced in any application - turbo or n/a build. They do not have to be strengthened, as they don't endure anymore stress as power increases. Changing cams simply changes airflow characteristics of the motor - intake and exhaust. They can be beneficial if spec'd appropriately for the application. But by the same token, they can also rob you of power if spec'd inappropriately.)
Third, the CVT operates in a completely different fashion than a normal auto transmission, as everyone here knows. Would it benefit from cryo treatment? Most likely. Cryo treating it will still strengthen some of parts that endure the stress under load (as there are still gears in there). However, your weak point will still remain, and that's the belt and pulley system. Cryo treatment will not help you there. Point is: Address the weak link before strengthening the stronger links. You're still only as strong as your weakest link.