well maybe he's just talkin about ford in genreal or he's probably talking about the POS 5.0 models they made.glozaeta wrote:Where'd you hear a Mustang GT blows at 430Hp???
wait a ford blew an engine??? no way? LOLHussain wrote:ya i agree with you about the guinea pig thing and i heard that CVT couldn't take torque before. that that's the reason why people say it can't take Turbo. but ya, hopefully in time we'll see some turbo CVTs.
about the mustang. my friend told me. he has a 1998 Mustang and put a 4.6L GT motor in it (pre 2005). he told me they blow at 430. his is supercharged and he said he was going to leave it at 400 to get the most life out of it and as soon as it blows, he'll get forged internals and up the boost..... my brother said his motor blew the other day lol
lol maybe...but they are still facing a growing deficit since 1990 lol....ford is losing money by the day....oh and toyota is now the #1 car seller in the world, #2 is GM, and #3 is fordHussain wrote:lol i hear a lot of people talk badly about ford but keep in mind, Ford is the largest car company in the world. Ford owns Land Rover, owned jaguar, ASTON MARTIN.... Ford could easily get ideas from there other divisions. also, according to top gear "they sell nearly a million of these a year. that's 107 an hour, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week". the F150 is the best selling car IN THE WORLD. if Ford makes that kind of money on the F150 alone, they have enough money to do what ever they want lol
but ya, mustangs are cheap power. they can be amazingly fast for a lot less then most other cars, excellent value. but, they're not the best thing on corners lol actually far from it lol
A turbo works the same whether it's a CVT, manual, or traditional automatic. Turbochargers have nothing to do with the transmission.Hussain wrote:does anyone know how Turbo works with CVT? now i know a billion people will say CVT can't take turbo but that's a WRONG myth because it's been done on a CVT murano. my question is how? i mean if it never shifts gears, you wont use the blow off valve and wont that like mess up your engine? unless you keep your RPMs down in "D" so that you dont use the Turbo and then when you want to race or go fast, you use manual mode.... didn't they say Artisan was also working on Turbo for CVT coupes? i wonder if you could just use the stick shifts turbo kit or something.... the 4x4 Murano CVT with turbo was pushing 350 horsepower
haha, The F150 is the best selling car ONLY in North america, it doesn't make any impact anywhere else. As for land rover jag and aston, they did nothing but loose money for Ford, and as of now jag and LR are owned by TaTa an indian company.As for tons of money? Ford was close to being bankrupt back in 06. Well in the case of how much power the CVT can handle, There is a F1 formula 1 car that has a CVT, and the belt can handle nearly 800+horses. Problem is the nissan one is a cheap mass produced one which will break.Hussain wrote:lol i hear a lot of people talk badly about ford but keep in mind, Ford is the largest car company in the world. Ford owns Land Rover, owned jaguar, ASTON MARTIN.... Ford could easily get ideas from there other divisions. also, according to top gear "they sell nearly a million of these a year. that's 107 an hour, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week". the F150 is the best selling car IN THE WORLD. if Ford makes that kind of money on the F150 alone, they have enough money to do what ever they want lol
but ya, mustangs are cheap power. they can be amazingly fast for a lot less then most other cars, excellent value. but, they're not the best thing on corners lol actually far from it lol
They dont attach physically to a transmission however how do you expect that power to get to the ground? The cvt could or could not handle the pressure. No one knows for sure. Your drivetrain is only as strong as your weakest link. That could be the CVT, or it could be a valve spring, who knows yet until they put this kit on a road car.Jeff7181 wrote:
A turbo works the same whether it's a CVT, manual, or traditional automatic. Turbochargers have nothing to do with the transmission.
i dont think there is anything wrong w/ cvt....its just when everyone hears CVT they automatically assume that its bad and powerless....i think the CVT will more than do the job....again in my research it says all CVT's made proir to 06 had problems becasue the way they are built....the new Xtronic CVT has enough power and durabillity, i just hop the pulleys can keep upadidas2go wrote:
They dont attach physically to a transmission however how do you expect that power to get to the ground? The cvt could or could not handle the pressure. No one knows for sure. Your drivetrain is only as strong as your weakest link. That could be the CVT, or it could be a valve spring, who knows yet until they put this kit on a road car.
Whether increased output comes from a turbo charger, super charger, nitrus oxide, or converting it to run on methanol doesn't matter.adidas2go wrote:
They dont attach physically to a transmission however how do you expect that power to get to the ground? The cvt could or could not handle the pressure. No one knows for sure. Your drivetrain is only as strong as your weakest link. That could be the CVT, or it could be a valve spring, who knows yet until they put this kit on a road car.
useless redundant informationJeff7181 wrote:
Whether increased output comes from a turbo charger, super charger, nitrus oxide, or converting it to run on methanol doesn't matter.
The question was how will a CVT respond to a turbo charger. Well... it will respond exactly the same as it would to any other power adder that adds the same amount of power as the specific turbo setup you're talking about. The transmission doesn't know or care where the power comes from, they're completely unrelated.
Ask yourself this... how will the tires respond to a turbo? Any different than a super charger that adds the same amount of power? Of course not.
:adidas2go wrote:
useless redundant information
Sorry. I didn't mean to embarass you or make you feel inferior. In the future I'd be happy to send you an email to correct your faulty logic to prevent further damage to your ego if you'd prefer.adidas2go wrote:
useless redundant information
defense mechanismJeff7181 wrote:
Sorry. I didn't mean to embarass you or make you feel inferior. In the future I'd be happy to send you an email to correct your faulty logic to prevent further damage to your ego if you'd prefer.