
http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/loc....html
Modified by UpStar at 5:40 PM 12/29/2009

It doesn't. I thought that was the point. You are terrible at this subjugating the masses thing man.AZhitman wrote:when does it end?
themadscientist wrote:
It doesn't. I thought that was the point. You are terrible at this subjugating the masses thing man.
I'll walk through a scanner before I let some dude touch my package.UpStar wrote:Has anyone felt the wrath of the new pat down? I've flown to and from PHX twice since Nov1 and it not a good feeling. I find that most travelers are avoiding the new scanners atleast in Phoenix
which airline would that be. ive got some calls to make.bigbadberry3 wrote:How about a separate airline that has NO security as an option? Let the market decide.
I'm sure there are many who would.96Qowner wrote:I'd gladly fly on a no-security airline.

How about not posting under the influence?bigbadberry3 wrote:How about a separate airline that has NO security as an option? Let the market decide.
IBCoupe wrote:I'm sure there are many who would.96Qowner wrote:I'd gladly fly on a no-security airline.
But that's not the problem. We don't care if there are people who wouldn't mind putitng their own lives at extra risk. It's the 3,000 people in two skyscrapers who didn't elect to get on a no-security airline that's the problem.
