jeramifrost wrote:It is illegal to ride a bike across the bridge to the next town where i train with other people for a triathalon. Even if i did said training alone at home out in the country by my house (which is already a bad idea with no shoulders and limited viewing distances) i would still need a way to get the bike to the actual race which is 30 miles away. So its not that i am lazy, but merely its not legal to ride to where i train which is already almost 20 miles from where i live as it is. I also like to do trail riding at my parents place in north carolina which is 480 miles away, so i guess i should ride my bike there too?
Well a 480 road trip would provide plenty training for sure. Set you up for the Tour de France. At 25 mph on a bike that would be about 20 hours non stop?
However I have to agree that riding bikes on most US roads is a dangerous proposition and really not yet a good transportation alternative, in the country or the cities If the high cost of fuel persist then there will be a change of attitudes towards using bikes and providing space for them. That would be a good thing but we are far from there yet. In the meantime, I am of the opinion that the way of the future is high fuel cost and folks with a limited supply of bucks will have to do some figuring. Such as, "do I really want to spend my limited funds to drive 480 miles, one way to go bike trail riding" ?
I'm not picking on you but simply using this situation as an example of having to start thinking about how will I use my gas budget?
To return to the topic, "trailer hitch for our cars that will carry a bike" which would be rendered moot if it becomes too expensive to engage in frivolous pursuits of happiness? Thus rendering the need for a bike carrier as, well. un-needed. So I'll rest my case here and post no more on this subject.
Jack