AZhitman wrote:Holy damn, I'm crackin' up in here...![]()
![]()
wanna know how im not a terrorlst? terrorists dont have a sense of humor.
AZhitman wrote:Holy damn, I'm crackin' up in here...![]()
![]()
Yeah, but didja hear the story about the blonde terrorlst who decided to blow up a school bus? ... And burned her lips on the tailpipe?heliochrome85 wrote:wanna know how im not a terrorlst? terrorists dont have a sense of humor.AZhitman wrote:Holy damn, I'm crackin' up in here...![]()
![]()
Ah, but the race card is max'ed out, right?AZhitman wrote:That's racist.![]()

themadscientist wrote: The face of the American terrorism. Kind of chubby.
infiniti_lineup wrote:
I hope for the worst to come to his family too.
I agree, if he murdered the guy, death penalty works for me too, but his family will suffer enough losing him, and I dont think its right to wish them further duress. I dont think you ever heard anyone rational call for duress to befall the families of the 9/11 attackers. I certainly didnt.heliochrome85 wrote:infiniti_lineup wrote:
I hope for the worst to come to his family too.
every family has their black sheep, there is no reason to think he isnt theres.
id go with the orange chicken bowl...AZhitman wrote:
Then I'd go to Applebee's for a steak.
Is that Panda Express orange chicken? Love that stuff! Tried to make it myself, wasnt too bad, no panda thoheliochrome85 wrote:id go with the orange chicken bowl...AZhitman wrote:
Then I'd go to Applebee's for a steak.
id confess to being D.B. Cooper if it meant i got extra sauce...
WDRacing wrote: Until the Muslim community stands up and rids the world of these extremists, the world's view of Muslims is pretty much not going to be positive, shocker right.
Its funny the local radio show here yesterday was talking about the whole 1 in 5 thing. So many stats are 1 in 5. Heck 1 in 5 Americans cant find America on a world map!srellim234 wrote:WD, I agree with almost everything you say except the statement about the perception of the POTUS. The latest from Pew research:
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1701/poll-o ... -religious
People don't know WHAT he is, but only 1 in 5 is not "universally viewed." That's as bad as these politicians who claim they have a majority of the populace mandate because they got 52% of the votes of the 30% of registered voters who bothered to show up. And those 30% are an even smaller subset of the eligible adults who bothered to register in the first place.
You're so naive it's pathetic. We've been reading and watching about Islamic terrorists for over a decade. How does that come close to comparing with the one idiot and the cabby. You missed the entire point, which isn't surprising after reading your opinions.infiniti_lineup wrote:You're going to post this RIGHT AFTER we just learned about a kid almost killing a Muslim? Ever heard of the saying, "It takes two to tango"?WDRacing wrote:The only thing we see on the news is more and more kids getting killed because of Muslims.
....And cause even more bloodshed? No thanks.WDRacing wrote:Until the Muslim community stands up and rids the world of these extremists, the world's view of Muslims is pretty much not going to be positive, shocker right.
Funny thing is that most of the people in the protest rallies in front of the Mosque are NOT directly or adversely affected by 9/11 or any other events that involved the death of an American. They are just simpletons that have nothing better to do than further the demise of the United States.WDRacing wrote:Take all of that and dump it on a depressed populace. Wanna build a mosk, fine, but don't expect everyone to be f'n happy about it. Some of these people have lost loved ones, then their jobs, then their houses and now have nothing. These people are dangerous.
You wouldn't be saying the same thing if it was YOUR catholic church or jewish temple being built in your suburb and there was protest against it.WDRacing wrote:Seriously, what does the Muslim community expect? What you're looking at is reality...you can hope in one hand and take a nice healthy steamer in the other. Doesn't change a damn thing. Yeah the Constitution says blah blah freedom of religion, well you can have your freedom of religion, but get the F out of my face with it. We're at friggin war with Muslim terrorists that bombed and killed thousands of Americans and oh btw they are still doing it...so yeah, not all of us are happy about a God Damn mosk anywhere near ground zero. Don't like it, tough s***. Feel free to build it somewhere else...I mean wtf did you really expect.
The issue lies within your perception of people. Don't view me as Christian and don't view them as Muslim. VIEW IT AS: We are ALL Americans. We all deserve the same respect and rights as our fellow Americans, no matter what religion they are. Don't view the structure as a Mosque. VIEW IT AS: Another building surrounded by thousands of others in New York City that we will probably never have a need to enter.
Reread what I said. I said it was insensitive to put a mosk there, not that they couldn't. Has nothing to do with Freedom of Religion. I also never said that being offended trumped anything. I was attempting to explain why some people feel the way they do. I went as far as to describe how the media mostly the bad side of Islam. YOU just read what you wanted to read.heliochrome85 wrote:and when did being offended trump constitutional rights?
there is no consensus amongst the families of the victims whether it should be built or not.
there is already a mosque in the area that no one minds.
and that you dont care that places of worship are threatened by herd mentality speaks volumes.
This country was founded on the basis of religious freedom and tolerance. that you dont care if the conversation has morphed into one of intolerance is a sad example of what "patriotism" stands for, and how deeply misguided about constitutional matters both you and the "Crusade" you apparently are a part of are.
This is not Saudi Arabia. That we can have a Masjid near Ground Zero speaks to us as a country.
lastly, the only way to compare this place to a foreign example, say a church in afghanistan, is if Christianity as a whole is being blamed for the bombing. Unless you can prove that I, as a muslim have a bomb jacket in my closet, and that i have been taught to kill as part of my religion, then this argument has absolutely no standing what so ever.
I dont see anyone objecting to building new catholic schools and churches even though the number of people who were complacent with the abuse scandal boggles the mind, as do the number of victims. Where are the people protesting and demanding to see a repudiation of child abuse in Catholicism, at every church construction site? Show me evidence that America is using the same logic about open wounds in other constructions of other religious structures. Until then, im just going to see opposition to this structure as largely bigoted, and definately being profitted on by the Tea Party, Fox News, Harry Reid, and The GOP.
Um...how about YOU get your head straight kid. I didn't say the media was right, I was explaining why people feel the way they do. We don't have to be at war with EVERYONE to have been at war since 91. Then again, I've been deployed to the Middle East since 93 when I enlisted. So I don't have a sheltered and naive view of everything unlike yourself.IBCoupe wrote:WDRacing
Sensationalism sells. We see Muslims on the news because we've got a country chock full of people like you who'll tune in to see it.
We're not at war with Islam. The fact that we aren't invading Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Libya, Syria, and countless others is evidence to that fact.
Get your head on straight and then try again.
There were two paragraphs there, bucko. "Get your head on straight" dealt with the second.WDRacing wrote:Um...how about YOU get your head straight kid. I didn't say the media was right, I was explaining why people feel the way they do. We don't have to be at war with EVERYONE to have been at war since 91. Then again, I've been deployed to the Middle East since 93 when I enlisted. So I don't have a sheltered and naive view of everything unlike yourself.
Islam is a religion. When I said we're at war with Islam, it was more of a generic statement. But it's fundamentally true. Without Islam, there would be no Jihad. With no Jihad we'd have no war. Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Islam twisted by some and used as an excuse for Holy War. How is that not a connection?IBCoupe wrote:What I'm saying is that I disagree with the premise upon which you build your argument.
Being at war with people who identify as Muslims is not the same as being at war with Islam. In fact, even being at war with some people who employ terrorlst tactics does not mean that we are at war with terrorism.
Further, there's nothing that links terrorism to Islam. Terrorism is a tactic. Islam is a religion.
That Islam is the recruiting tool and the justification does not mean that it's the source of the trouble. There would be no room for extremists to recruit against the West if there was no contact with the West. There would be no room for extremists to use Islam to justify their actions if there weren't some perceived offenses.WDRacing wrote:But it's fundamentally true. Without Islam, there would be no Jihad. With no Jihad we'd have no war. Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Islam twisted by some and used as an excuse for Holy War. How is that not a connection?