Thats a false statement right there. Because there is just as many people out there that buy them and use them with no problems.s14_240sx wrote:Alot of people cheap out and buy th ssauto**** top mounts, which are horribly made and don't have enough support so they crack. but it won't matter if you spend the extra money and buy good ****.
Well I dunno about 100% but maybe 99.9% but even then it's ok cause I make up for the .1% HAHAWDRacing wrote:
Don't believe the hype just cause it was posted on the almighty interweb. Unless of course I say it, then it's 100% fact.
So theres a small difference in the lag between the log style and the tubular? It seems as though the log-style manifolds are a bit quieter, more durable and dissipate less heat than the tubular types which are some other reasons for using the log mani.480sx wrote:Logs dont put down the torque that a tubular manifold will, but typically have a tinnnyyyy bit faster spool.
Also no ones said anything about weight distribution. Top mounts put your center of gravity a bit higher than stock which really isnt what you want, while bottom mounts keep things a bit more balanced.
AWSOME man...very well done.Ligerzero wrote:Ebay manifold with a t3 flange welded on as well as an external dump and flange for the wastegate....