Never!klattr1 wrote:when you gonna build up a motor?
why is it a risk?his car makes most of its power in the higher rpms since he has JWT cams and peak cylinder pressure in his motor is prolly around 4500 rpms (peak tq)TachyonS14 wrote:my s14 base with me in it weighed 2850 and thats with almost full tank of gas and full interior+trunk.
Nice times btw. But man, you are risky takin it up to that high rpm while boosting.
Measure the internal forces of the motor at that RPM... by that logic I should be able to easily achieve 7800 rpm in my SR which isn't exactly outrageous, but is asking alot out of the bearings.klattr1 wrote:why is it a risk?his car makes most of its power in the higher rpms since he has JWT cams and peak cylinder pressure in his motor is prolly around 4500 rpms (peak tq)
i dont know of many people having problems with the KA at that rpm. The only reason for Orion to stay in that rpm range is cuz he is making power there. The only KA ive known to have problems at high rpms spun a bearing due to 8000 rpm rev-limiter (thats another story in itself).7800 rpms is asking alot for SR without RAS's.Nismo_Freak wrote:
Measure the internal forces of the motor at that RPM... by that logic I should be able to easily achieve 7800 rpm in my SR which isn't exactly outrageous, but is asking alot out of the bearings.
RAS = 80klattr1 wrote:
i dont know of many people having problems with the KA at that rpm. The only reason for Orion to stay in that rpm range is cuz he is making power there. The only KA ive known to have problems at high rpms spun a bearing due to 8000 rpm rev-limiter (thats another story in itself).7800 rpms is asking alot for SR without RAS's.
or a stock ka.:: orion :: wrote:
If I wanted 200,000 miles from a motor, I'd drive a Kia.
- Brian
I'd never drive a stock KA, are you crazy?ultimatuc wrote:...or a stock ka.
Yes..it's a '96 ECU, but my '96 has all the emmsions stuff removed. A strock '95 ECU never threw codes, but this one does...always a secondary 02 code.ultimatuc wrote:...do you have any cel's w/ the jwt ecu?
Time for diet Bri:: orion :: wrote:So race weight was right at ~3000lbs with me in it.
I don't mean to take this out on you...but...fastpace wrote:Do you think it is really need to get a safc to lean out the jwt ecu if you are at 13psi?
Good point.WDRacing wrote:For the price JWT can't be beat...simple as that. Not even any need to argue the point. I would use the SAFC to lean out the mix if I were running alky at the same time, then have my AFs around 13.5 or so....
you should be fine if you run stock compression for a lil while. they dont advance the timing really that much for the 8.5:1 programs.this i what i would do (knowing they program conservatively): tell them you want the 8.5:1 program and run 9:1 pistons.S14tat wrote:well since we're on the topic of JWT ecu's anyways. heres a question. i'm gonna ship out the ECU that i bought from Orion to JWT to have ti chipped to run with 550cc injectors, and with maps to run 9:1 or 8.5:1 comp ratio. however i'm planning to put it in my stock 9.5:1 comp engine until the summer running 12 psi.
since orion says the timing curve is really conservative on it. do you think i can pull it off?
also i'm still debating on waht compression to run. i'm goal it 350whp on street gas ( 93 octane ) and 400whp on C16. do you think 9:1 comp ratio would be the better choice? cuase i know if i had maps for a 9:1 i can almost definitly pull it off by running it on my stock comp.