What college essay? Is KISS supposed to be some sort of euphemism for "I do not want to over think a concept"? This is my first time with that word, KISS Who or what group is shoving down what, down whose throats, and how is this related to any purported discussion? Could you assist me here?audtatious wrote:Dude, this is not a place to write college essays to get a question out. Follow the K.I.S.S method - Keep It Simple Stupid
I don't see where people are less tolerant of others they meet on a daily basis. I do see that they are less tolerant of having others viewpoints shoved down their throats as fact with disregard to discussion.
What do you think I do partly for a living? Who are the most people referred to? And what is simplicity, and what role does it play in the ever complex world of tolerance? How does one address a benign but active and complex concept such as tolerance with relatively simple thoughts? And, why not write it like a college essay to begin with? Each time one asks why, I am apt to ask why not? What do you think?audtatious wrote:Your OP reads like a college textbook. Most people will stop reading it after the first line. KISS simply means to keep things to as much of a simplistic level as possible. Why tear down and rebuild your current home that is too small when you simply could have added to it....That's KISS. In this case, why write something like a college essay when you could have simplified it.
No, I did not read it all so simply ignore my tolerance comments.
I think I'm about to put you on my ignore list.Jacko3 wrote:
What do you think I do partly for a living? Who are the most people referred to? And what is simplicity, and what role does it play in the ever complex world of tolerance? How does one address a benign but active and complex concept such as tolerance with relatively simple thoughts? And, why not write it like a college essay to begin with? Each time one asks why, I am apt to ask why not? What do you think?
Jacko3 wrote:
Is KISS supposed to be some sort of euphemism for "I do not want to over think a concept"? This is my first time with that word, KISS
Reading Is Fundamental.audtatious wrote:Follow the K.I.S.S method - Keep It Simple Stupid
Here's a news flash: If smart people think, when they read something you've posted, it means one of two things:Jacko3 wrote:Who are the most people referred to?
And what is simplicity, and what role does it play in the ever complex world of tolerance?
audtatious wrote: Most people will stop reading it after the first line.
480sx wrote:I think you should find a philosophy forum.
AZhitman wrote:
Your random stream-of-consciousness psychoblather is inane and certainly leads me to doubt your alleged profession.
These kinds of words us simple country folk have a hard time wrapping our minds around.Jacko wrote:polarization phenomenon purportedly communism globalization acculturation sophisticated assymetric polarization facet society epitome stakeholders intellectually
I first tried to read that like it was a sentence and got about 4 words in and just started geeking out. Lol +1 for random laugh of the day.Jacko wrote: polarization phenomenon purportedly communism globalization acculturation sophisticated assymetric polarization facet society epitome stakeholders intellectually
I will help youdusred wrote:polarization phenomenon purportedly communism globalization acculturation sophisticated assymetric polarization facet society epitome stakeholders intellectually
Bah. I do technical writing and run across people who think using big words are impressive all the time. I usually spend my time explaining it in basic English in order for my customers to understand it. Nothing new to me other than I don't have to take the time to read the crap posted up above.dusred wrote:
If you say you didn't use Google I'm going to raise the BS flag
seems some people feel intimidatedAZhitman wrote:
Here's a news flash: If smart people think, when they read something you've posted, it means one of two things:
They're dumb.Your question is ridiculous.
I'm inclined to believe the latter.
Simplicity in speech and written communication is far more impressive than vague and nebulous chatter.
Might I suggest:
http://www.timesrecordnews.com...se-on/
Thank you. Your comment is the most mature and human comment so far. Well said! If members talked to other people the way you do, would be in a state of constant advacement.dusred wrote:
I read the first line and then went to the comments
For a minute there I thought Jacko had hijacked your account, Greg.
But yeah, Jacko, this is an automotive forum and most of us folks here are quite simple minded. Please do your best to keep it simple.
Thanks!
Edit -
Just so you know what I'm talking about, Jacko, here you go:
These kinds of words us simple country folk have a hard time wrapping our minds around.
Gregg:AZhitman wrote:Not a chance.
I don't intimidate easily - Physically or intellectually.
Good to know.Jacko3 wrote:
Gregg:
I am tenacious in my own way. Whether you like it or not, you are gonna be Jacko's best friend someday.
Various aspects of a political discussion require investments in ideologies or philosophies. I wish it were different for humanity. However, that isn't the case.480sx wrote:I think you should find a philosophy forum.
LOL! I like that. That was funny. So, how was your day today at work?AZhitman wrote:
Good to know.
I dated a girl recently who said, "Like it or not, you and I are going to be married someday."
Her sh*t was on the curb within the hour.
Coincidentally, she was "all fluff, no substance" too.
Interesting! You seem upset, and yet you are unaware that i actually agree with your views in your last sentence. I thought that was a nice heart-felt comment. what you have said is the fundamental basis of a good debate--how do you hold your own without giving in? So, I am unsure why you are upset, when you presented a great idea.liquid_cool wrote:Tolorance is what your asking..why Americans dont have it like other wussifyed nations?..i know why i dont..becouse i wont change my viewpoints or beliefes becouse it bennifits me for a certain moment...why ask for tolorance?.. in the first place to ask for a solution to a difference by in point of view,beliefs,ect..in a way to make the other party change there fudamental position makes the person asking..well..intolorable..
thats my answer to that term paper..read it as you may..but i will never give in to changing a belief or point of view i hold to apease onother party or person in the battle of idea's ...
Beautiful! This is the the funniest and cutest ad hoc prose created from the work of another. Ingenious! Nice. I like it.audtatious wrote:
I will help you
Polarization is a kind of glass in sunglasses
phenomenon is a movie with John Travolta
purportedly is the act of intentionally getting fat (portly)
communism is what Russia was
globalization...hell, I dunno what that is
acculturation is what a doctor does when seeing if you are really sick or not
sophisticated is how city folk say they are different than us rednecks
asymetrical is a type of cymbal sued with a drum set
facet is a point cut into a diamond ring
epitome is one of those old record labels from the 50's
stakeholder is the person who holds the stake over the vampires heart. Not to be confused with the steakhitter
intellectually is using big words in order to confuse people into thinking they are smart
I hope that clears things up for you.....
Jacko3 wrote:aspects ideologies philosophies
See, while I COULD take you guys to task (DUSRED), I'll just say this. Jacko and I have had more than a few run-ins on the G forums. I have no trouble seeing right through his wall of text. I find it comical that you guys picked on his "high falutin' words" and no one mentioned that the entire first "paragraph" is ONE SENTENCE. Mind you, with MULTIPLE ANDS, when the rules of modern standard English allow for one "and." Good job Jacko. Why dont you stick to the G forums where you can pontificate on the glories of your car, and driving in general. As I've said before to many Johnny come-latelys, Quiet, Men are talking.Jacko3 wrote:While polarization isn't exactly a new phenomenon in american politics (for example Thomas Jefferson's bitter political campaign for the Presidency with John Adams), it would appear that given the availability and accessibility of relevant information, greater accessibility to education by many in our nation, and a purportedly freer society since the exposure of the failings of communism as a poliitcal ideal, and the spread of globalization, modern day americans may be less tolerant of each other's ideas, actions and positions, to the extent that acculturation, sophisticated political markerting techniques, and unsually evident assymetric information, may have contributed in varying degrees, to widening levels of limited tolerance in our political system.
Modified by Jacko3 at 2:53 PM 2/24/2009
Modified by Jacko3 at 3:38 PM 2/24/2009