If you plan on doing any driving even in light snow, the Dunlop, Yokohama, and Either Michelin would be far safer than the Firehawks. The SZ50 is a nice tire for wet and dry use but is worthless in even light snow or ice. You might as well park the car and get out the Pathfinder

The internal ply/belt construction on the symmtrical and asymmetrical tires are the same, only the tread design is changed. They went with the wider sweeping rain tread design on the wider, lower profile sizes. It's not one of the more aggressive handling tires but does very well for an all-season. Much better wet traction (in both tread designs) than the Yokohama AVS DB 2. This is mostly due to the redesigned tread blocks on the shoulder of the Yokohama. The outer blocks are tied toghether to reduce heel-toe wear that plagued the first version. The trade-off is reduced wet traction as the tire wears. The XGT V4 would be the better of the Michelins. The H4 would be too soft for my tastes on that heavy of a car. The other issue is Michelin's use of half depth sipes (the narrow slits in the shoulder tread blocks). They do this to maintain better wear on the outer edges of the tread. The only problem is that once you get about half way into the tire wear half of the outer slits disappear. While this is great for dry traction, it increases the tendency of the tire to loose grip on wet pavement in corners. Tire design is always a give and take and each manufactuer has their own way of attacking a problem. There will always be trade offs I guess. :rolleyes