SloS13 wrote:why would you want to win a race due to another driver's error??!?
Ask any racer, any real racer. It doesn't matter if you win by an inch or a mile; winning's winning. You never had me, you never had your car.
soilwork240sx wrote:well hes a bad driver then. seriously, you will not beat or come close to a gst. it is turbocharged. ka has tourque with no pull in the high end. sorry bro it just isnt gonna happen.
CanadianCoch wrote:Only ALL 5th & 6th gen celica's, and 7th gens minus the GTS(depends on mods)Only most civicsOnly any NA talon/eclipse (not sure about the new V6's though)acura integra RS & GScavalier, malibu, s10, dodge avenger, most neon's, spirit's, Lebarons, 4 clyinder countour's, escort's, focus's (not SVT's), probe's, tempo's, 4 cylinder accords, ever CRX i've raced, any kia i've seen, mazda mx3 & mazda mx6, 626, protege, topaz, galant, mirage, 200sx, nx, grand am, sunfire, sunbirds, and saturn i've raced, older mr2's NA (the 3S engine), some jetta's, golf's,
I think i've myself or seen someone race each of these, and most of them weren't stock
It's not quick stock, no, but it can still hold it's own!
Dr.
APEXi240 wrote:How does your engine make more power using lower octane gas? The difference in how fast it burns is neglible in a near stock car. Did you dyno it with 93 then 89?
Also the owners manual says to use 91 octane for the 95+ 240sx.
droptopsilvia wrote: seriously you might just be wasting gas if he was a car and a half ahead at 105 you're probably not gonna make that up thats at least a half a second....so good luck on winning but hey racing is always fun regardless of losing.
droptopsilvia wrote:maybe if you fill up with a gallon of 116 and get a perfect launch and lose a few pounds. seriously you might just be wasting gas if he was a car and a half ahead at 105 you're probably not gonna make that up thats at least a half a second....so good luck on winning but hey racing is always fun regardless of losing.