s13jus10 wrote: to the op, i'll tell you this. I own all three next-gen systems. let me say that again: I own all THREE systems. I've worked at best buy in the gaming department for two years now. working there, i've personally seen how many customers come in and have to exchange their 360s for new ones because of the RROD, and I can tell you it's not a pretty number.
No one doubts that the 360 has had an unusual amount of failure rates. But have you actually seen how many people haven't? Until then, you can't make any real assessment of how bad it is.
s13jus10 wrote:microsoft stuck that 3year warranty on it because they KNOW it has problems. for gawd's sake the system hasn't even been out for 3 years. customers come in and tell me all the time that they've waited up to 3 months before getting their "refurbished" 360 back from microsoft. they keep releasing new "versions" of the system (hdmi pro, halo version, elite) but for some reason choose not to fix any of the real problems that it has.
Umm? They have been updating it. Trying to redesign such a complicated console is not cheap or easy. Especially considering that the evolution the design will be taking (such as 65nm technology) may alleviate such issues. MS is trying to be proactively generous with the warranty. While Sony is denying PS3 warraties over simply being dusty. Something can be said about how a company reacts to a problem as much as how much problems their products have...
s13jus10 wrote:anyone saying that the ps3 is just not worth the price needs to look back and total up how much they spent in order to fully utilize the 360's features. xbox360 pro - $350 (halo $400, elite $450). wireless adapter - $100 (and no, not even the elite comes with it). xboxlive - $50 a year. rechargeable batteries - $20 for play&charge kit, $40 for quick charge kit. external hd-dvd drive - $180. anyone have a calculator? and after all that, you still run the risk of your 360 breaking down on you lol. uhm.. ps3 has all that BUILT IT. it may seem like the price of the ps3 is pretty steep up front, but in the long run, you won't have to buy any add-ons to make your gaming experience fully enjoyable.
Uhh? I'm fully utilizing all three of my 360's. None need the wireless because I wired up every one of them. I hate wireless network dropouts. It's bad enough that the cable company screws it up enough.
XBOX live is not about paying for the console. It's about paying for a service. One that Sony has not matched yet. Perhaps Home will be nice and all, but until they set standards for the devs to follow, then it can never be as well integrated. Unless of course they keep all that memory overhead and let the console handle all these features.
s13jus10 wrote:as for the "AMAZING FANTASTIC XBOX360 GAMING LINEUP"..what exactly does that consist of? 1.halo....2.gears....3.forza.................?? am I missing anything? the thing has been out for 2 1/2 years and that's all it has produced? don't get me wrong, I can't go without my gears of war (phenomenal game). but everything else, I can pretty much take a pass on.
So what does he PS3 have that is oh so amazing? All I keep hearing about is delay after delay.
s13jus10 wrote:it may seem like I'm here to just bash on the 360, and I'm not. but when it comes to people predjudicely bringing down other systems without even having their own experience with it, it makes me mad. AGAIN, I own all three systems. knowing and learning as much as I can about video games and systems has been my JOB for 2 years. I sell video game systems for a living. and with that I don't feel "guilty" or "fanboy-ish" when I talk crap on the 360. no it doesn't suck. it's just simply NOT THAT GREAT. as a matter of fact I love the system because it gives us big time revenue because people HAVE to buy the extended warrantees for it
Owning all three systems doesn't mean you can't have a favorite. And why do I have to buy an extended warranty? All of mine have three years worth...