Yes, I am.JoshIsSciFi wrote:Your tellin me that a group of engineers, with degrees in all this, didn't know that plastic wouldn't fail under intense heat and stress like 7k rpm out of a V8?
I'm referring to the VERY SIGNIFICANT oil crisis that hit before you and I were born. Think OPEC, Jimmy Carter, catalytic converters. Dramatic design changes that swept the auto industry came about when efficiency was suddenly emphasized.JoshIsSciFi wrote:What crisis? It's $1.97 a gallon for Premium here...
Expected lifespan? Don't mention that to D.O.T. That is called planed obsolecence. And in the USA, that is an illegal legal Business practice.Jesda wrote:The awful chain guide problem affected about 1% of all VH45DEs during their expected life cycle. The Qs that you and I own are FAR BEYOND their expected life cycle. To keep a car this long, you are going beyond factory expectations for longetivity, and accepting the possibility of mechanical failures, thus the need for meticulous maintenance and care.
You are warping the intent of the law.PoorManQ45 wrote:Expected lifespan? Don't mention that to D.O.T. That is called planed obsolecence. And in the USA, that is an illegal legal Business practice.
Vehicles should not be built with an "Expected Lifespan". As Q45Tech has stated before, vehicles can last forever if properly maintained. ANd oh, replacing the Timing chain guides is not part of proper maintenence.
Horsepower does not "do the work" at higher speeds. F = m*a guys, no matter what speed you're at. Acceleration is what you feel. F is *directly* proportional to torque. Not horsepower. Torque is directly tied to acceleration and straight-line performance. Horsepower is somewhat related (via RPM). Honda's have decent horsepower...at 8300 RPM. It takes a while to get there and you just don't feel the kick in the pants. The S2000 has 240 PEAK hp (great!) but only 153 ft-lbs torque. It weights less than 2800 lbs yet takes over 15 seconds in the quarter.JoshIsSciFi wrote:PMQ Ya just stole my reply lol. Every person that knows about engines will say that Torque gets you moving, HP gets you faster. I will agree torque is what matters off the line, but past the 1/4 mile, hell even the 1/8th mile, its HP that does the work. And btw, why do they rate jet engines as HP?
It wasn't about efficiency, Jesda, it was about some nutcases saying that the world was going to be suffocated by all the exhaust, and about Democrats appeasing the Oil Rich Nations(Don't even start on politics, I said it, leave it at that), 1974 saw the bitter end of muscle cars, because they had to pass emissions test, thus why the power rating of them suddenly plummeted, yet, in 1973 the Trans-Am managed 19mpg... I wonder how that happened..... and our Qs get maybe 20... hmm...Jesda wrote:I'm referring to the VERY SIGNIFICANT oil crisis that hit before you and I were born. Think OPEC, Jimmy Carter, catalytic converters. Dramatic design changes that swept the auto industry came about when efficiency was suddenly emphasized.
I have a left and a right hand. They come together when I clapJesda wrote:
Examples of such seemingly illogical oddities can be found on the left as well as the right.
Actually, the price of oil used to be stated in terms of the US dollar. It is now being converted to the Euro standard. And as you know, the Dollar is Failing in comparison to the Euro. This is one of the many factors causing the price of Oil to go up.JoshIsSciFi wrote:grndprx18: and the oil crisis wasnt due to lack of oilgrndprx18: the rest of the world had s**toadsgrndprx18: like canadagrndprx18: the arabs just wouldnt ship any to JUST USgrndprx18: canada mexico rest of world didnt have long linesPsYcHo FreaK y2k: explain whygrndprx18: they were bashing us for mid east politicsgrndprx18: backing israelgrndprx18: and wanted to inflate oil prices because oil barrels price is pegged to US dollargrndprx18: prices in the world went up but their supply was never hurtgrndprx18: thus why there is a strategic oil reserve in lousiana to give US 6 months supply nowgrndprx18: if they shut off all exports to us againgrndprx18: 6 months of no US money to them would ruin their economies nowgrndprx18: so they have to play ball with us now
Not all of them, but about 99% of them. I've never encountered one that could come close to touching my stock SVX or Q, even off the line. The point is that people spend money on their car to try to change it into something it wasn't intended to be. But it extremely difficult and very costly to change the true essence of what was engineered at the factory. I can compare my stock Q to all these ricer Civics running around here as follows: My car is faster, handles better, brakes better, has a better ride, is more luxurious, is roomier inside, looks better(IMO), sounds better, but they do get better gas mileage and are more reliable(as HOMOCO designed them). And I spent a third as much? I point and laugh as much I can.PoorManQ45 wrote:Please don't bring Honda into this. I know plenty of Honda Civics that would literally blow the doors off of a Q45, G35, M45, and G20, having less then $10k in mods. You are just throwing them all into the category of "Big wing posers". But that is not true of all of them.
That's rarely said, and if it was, it was probably meant to be followed by an unspoken but understood "without spending a moderate amount of time and/or money (or committing a crime)." Like Jesda stated the vehicle is a collection of compromises--choices that had to be made at the factory, not at the dealership nor at the owner's home. Most people don't want bare foam seats and a voucher to their local upholstery store. There's a difference between personalizing your vehicle to suit your taste, and believing that for $20 you can buy some magic white pellets to throw in your gas tank that'll increase your mileage by 20%. Sure a lot of mods have benefits. Just don't ignore the drawbacks. Cool sig BTW.1qckser wrote:It has been stated time and time again that the Q can not be made better than it came from the factory, however im here to tell you it can,