[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nenQI4HrUhk[/youtube]

Cementing this awfulness is a Lexus ad for the SC430:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCmBFWVe4xM[/youtube]



While it is shaped like a turd,is about as exciting to drive as one, and appeals to only geriatric non-enthusiasts, it's far from the worst car. Anyone remember the yugo? the Pontiac Aztek? The Morris Marina (The car Top Gear keeps dropping pianos on). Or the Lada? the Trabant? the Le Car? the Subaru 360?VQpwrdSE-R wrote:I drive by one of these everyday. They are absolutely hideous. I had no idea they were produced past the year 2000 due to the fact that the appearance changes are so subtle. Looks like nothing's changed from the mid 90s. An '05 with v8 making up to 288hp? ..please.
With any luck drifters will mangle what's left of them.
The ultra snobby pebble beach edition complete with tacky red leather. Reminds me of a red pleather coat you would buy at a thrift store.
popular mechanics seems to think that the aztek will eventually become one of those random cars that a small group of people crave. i don't see it.Bubba1 wrote:it's far from the worst car. Anyone remember...the Pontiac Aztek?
I did watch the episode. It was great, and I loved the comments like it's more Buick Rivera than french riviera. But I disagree with Clarkson/Capt Slow that its a terrible car even factoring in who built it and its price.. Lexus found a niche for it: wealthy elderly americans. I'm still surprised the Austin (Morris) Marina did not make their list. That was an awful car.Razi wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLGg_dyWFtk
Watch the episode.
It wasn't just about being a terrible car, but the price and the maker was a factor as well.
It made hardly a dent in its intended market. Wealthy older Americans preferred the Jaguar XK and Mercedes SL.Bubba1 wrote:
I did watch the episode. It was great, and I loved the comments like it's more Buick Rivera than french riviera. But I disagree with Clarkson/Capt Slow that its a terrible car even factoring in who built it and its price.. Lexus found a niche for it: wealthy elderly americans. I'm still surprised the Austin (Morris) Marina did not make their list. That was an awful car.
Some don'tnumbnuts240 wrote:Bubba1 wrote:
back on topic, lexus sucks.

Yeah, I can see it. In 30-40 yrs, the Aztek could easily become mildly collectible like the Ford Edsel, another infamous car whose ugly styling killed it.numbnuts240 wrote:popular mechanics seems to think that the aztek will eventually become one of those random cars that a small group of people crave. i don't see it.
numbnuts240 wrote:i believe they likened the allure to the people who love edsels.
full list:
hummer h2
cadillac eldorado
pontiac aztek
2nd gen toyota prius
dodge magnum
scion xb
isuzu vehicross
plymouth neon
jaguar xjr
honda insight
That would have been a fun debate. I think many on that list were built in too large numbers even to become niche collectibles. Take the Plymouth Neon, for example, the fact that it has an extinct Plymouth badge instead of a Dodge will likely not result in any real premium in collectibility. The Neon will probably suffer the same fate as the infamous Pontiac T1000. Late in the Chevette's production run, GM sold some Chevettes branded as Pontiac, and called them the T1000. Pontiac has disappeared just like Plymouth, and T1K's are considerably less common than a Chevette now but guess what, they're still pretty much worthless because,well, they're still Chevettes, which were not good cars.numbnuts240 wrote:i got into a debate with my buddy over that list. i tried to explain to him that they won't be cars that will be featured in a barrett jackson auction 20-30 years from now, but that the magazine is predicting that there will be a niche market for them. quirky folks who love those quirky vehicles for reasons unbeknownst to anyone, not even them. they made mention of the datsun 510 in trying to get the point across in the article.
The Insight and Eldorado have a seriously dedicated following. The XJR is already a collectible. Dodge Magnum V8 could certainly be sought after.numbnuts240 wrote:i believe they likened the allure to the people who love edsels.
full list:
hummer h2
cadillac eldorado
pontiac aztek
2nd gen toyota prius
dodge magnum
scion xb
isuzu vehicross
plymouth neon
jaguar xjr
honda insight

+ it never had a manual transmission offered in the US which limited its appeal to enthusiasts, and they are not yet considered collectible.MinisterofDOOM wrote:What about the XJR is not amazing?! Except for the breaking down a lot.
Good point. Though there really aren't ANY cars of that size/market that came with manuals after the '80s. The 7 series and A8 were auto-only here as well (I think...some early E38s might have had manuals here but I don't think so). Certainly it does limit their appeal, but generally people who would want that kind of car are aware that they're going to have to settle for an auto. I know because I'm one of those people.Bubba1 wrote:+ it never had a manual transmission offered in the US which limited its appeal to enthusiasts, and they are not yet considered collectible.
Hmmm. I agree that manual trannies are rapidly disappearing, but I can think of a several manual trannied performance cars since the 80's, some of which are still around, and in the XKR's price range:MinisterofDOOM wrote: Good point. Though there really aren't ANY cars of that size/market that came with manuals after the '80s. The 7 series and A8 were auto-only here as well (I think...some early E38s might have had manuals here but I don't think so). Certainly it does limit their appeal, but generally people who would want that kind of car are aware that they're going to have to settle for an auto. I know because I'm one of those people.
1. The design pattern and Jaguar nameplate are not enough justification for it to become collectible. If that were true, people would be scooping up S-Types and X-types, which ain't happening.Jesda wrote:Less than 1% of Americans who buy an XJ, 7-series, or any large Cadillac want a manual anyway. The transmission has zero impact on the collectibility of luxury cars.
The XJR is the last in a line of cars styled after WJ Lyons' design theme established in the 60s and it combines modern technology and acceptable reliability with classic styling. Like the Mercedes W140, a clean and pristine one will always have value.
XJRs aren't rare yet because a decent number were sold worldwide. Meanwhile, you think the Dodge Magnum has more collectibility?Bubba1 wrote:1. The design pattern and Jaguar nameplate are not enough justification for it to become collectible. If that were true, people would be scooping up S-Types and X-types, which ain't happening.Jesda wrote:Less than 1% of Americans who buy an XJ, 7-series, or any large Cadillac want a manual anyway. The transmission has zero impact on the collectibility of luxury cars.
The XJR is the last in a line of cars styled after WJ Lyons' design theme established in the 60s and it combines modern technology and acceptable reliability with classic styling. Like the Mercedes W140, a clean and pristine one will always have value.
2. I agree the lack of the manual trannies in the US XK's has nothing to with it's collectibility but my point was that its a reason why the US sales volumes lower than they should have been.
3. Mercedes W140? Do you mean the S-class from the 90's? Uh, they might "always have value", but it certainly ain't much these days.
Anyone else seeing Jaguar XF ads over here???>>>>>>