I H8 UR DSM wrote:For one..MLB has revenue sharing..so dont use that old 'payroll' arguement because its not a 'fair' comparison statistic...besides the point you have to realize what goes into that payroll, ie. guys that are in the minors (drew hensens contract) traded/released players etc...
Go ahead, say "give billy bean XX amount" and make a promise...thats just speculation, and isnt based on any sort of psychic ability you have. Fact is If $ was the same, players are still going to prefer to go play for the most historical franchinse, the NY Yankees.
Yes, the Yankees have the most storied history in baseball. Yes the Yankees have been the most successful franchise of the past decade and the most succesful history of any sports team. No doubt about that. That Yankees mystique has played a big hand in luring talent from other teams. But c'mon, with huge contracts dangled in front of them, these guys are putty in Steinbrenner's hands. A lot of these guys put on the pinstripes because they feel it's the easiest way to a championship and there's no arguing the Yanks have the best chances of taking the series year in, year out.
I H8 UR DSM wrote:The yankee's payroll is not double the second payroll in baseball..
Of course it's not but if you paid attention the keyword was "nearly" and according to the Boston Globe, the Yanks have a $180 million payroll as opposed to the Sox' $105. Now I'm no math major but that's pretty close to double, wouldn't you say?
I H8 UR DSM wrote:I'm not a 'fan' of one specific team..but i do work in the front offices for one of the professional sports teams, so i have a pretty fair understanding on how payrolls are comprised and the fact they dont 'really' have a say in how a team is going to perform...sure that will always be the arguement against the yankee's, but look at the other high payroll teams, and their records...
You sure? I think I can see your pinstripes from here.
I H8 UR DSM wrote:Dont forget the amount of money the yanks give to the other small market franchise's through the collective barganing agreement, and how those teams select to USE that money in their organization.
See, here you failed to mention that a HUGE chunk of Steinbrenner's paycheck comes from his stranglehold of the television market.
I H8 UR DSM wrote:We cant 'give boone 190 million', there is no cap, so he has access to the money, his management though chooses not to invest that amount into the team, and that is their choice...no one forces them to have a low payroll.
Riiiigghht. That's like saying my mom can slap on some boxing gloves and go toe-to-toe with Mike Tyson. NOBODY in the league can play the big money game with the Yankees. It's absurd for small market teams like the A's, Kansas City and Montreal to shell out the kind of money the Yanks do. Just not economically feasible for teams that have a hard time selling 10,000 seats per game. Also, it's "Beane," not "Boone." Ask Steinbrenner which GM he'd rather have at the helm right now and we'll see...
I H8 UR DSM wrote:Go ahead, talk about 'farm systems'...you do know that the yankee's CORE of stars is all developed from within, Bernie Williams, Posada, Jeter, Petite......its not like these guys came from somewhere else...they were developed into yankee's an the yankee tradition...they pick up surrounding players from other teams over the years to fill spots they have empty....like a good organization would.
I never said the Yanks had a bad farm system I just stated the fact that the A's had a terrific one that's produced some great talent over the year's (McGwire, Ecks, Chavez, Giambi, Zito, Hudson, Mulder) and are much more dependant on said system as opposed of throwing money at players and reeling them in. In fact, I'd say the A's have had the best farming system of the past ten years. Most of the starters on this year's A's roster came up from their farming system.
Alright, I've had a year's worth of head butting these past few weeks. Gotta go watch the game now! Go SOX!!!