Post by
bishopant »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/bishopant-u9398.html
Sun Apr 06, 2003 10:30 pm
True about the shocks being valved for a specific spring rate from the factory. Unlike in my H&R Race spring KYB AGX combo. A little on that setup, which I'm well aware might be a popular choice among prospective shock/spring combo buyers. Anywho, I had this setup on my 95 Civic hatch. The AGX had four settings front and back. On hardest setting, the car cornered great (as great as a $500 suspension can anyway), but the ride got stiffer and the car rattled like crazy. What was unusual, was that the hatch would have it's rough days and once in a while it would be sound as a mouse. I mean that on setting 4, somedays it would feel really tight and quiet. Unlike most days on 4 when it's rattly as all hell. Still it cornered great.
Back to my question. AGX shocks are probably **** compared to TEIN. Not to get all partial for TEIN or anything, but if the popularity vote stands for anything here I'd say that TEIN is a quality product. Not just in appearance, but more importantly, performance. So, being that TEIN valves there dampers for a specific spring rate, in the case of the HE, bottom line: is it stiffer than the AGX H&R Race combo?
If this cannot be answered then how about answering this question:
Say you have two identical cars, say two 89 S13's. Both have many miles on the chassis and rattle like a normal 14-year-old car does. One car has stock suspension and the other TEIN HE's. Nothing else done to either car. You drive both cars over some nasty rail road tracks going 30mph. Which car will feel more like **** and/or rattle more?
Thanks and sorry for hijacking, Ant