stroking the KA...haha, get your mind back to cars!

Your premier source for information on the Turbo KA: KA24E-T and KA24DE-T (KA with aftermarket turbo kit)!
ca18deTbeGinNer
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 6:22 am
Car: JDM 190 Nissan 180sx - RHD byatches!!!

Post

would it be better performance wise, to stroke the SR20det to up the displacement...or stroking the KA for more displacement and then put a turbo on it??


MidWest240Collector
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 3:49 am

Post

It's pointless to stroke a KA. Even if you stroke a SR it's still .2L behind the KA. That is why the KA>SR

:: orion ::
Posts: 1483
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 4:40 pm
Car: '96 240SX, with KA-T @ 12psi...
Contact:

Post

Pound for pound, it'd be better to slap an LS6 under your hood and have 400rwhp with no power adder...but...

Stroking an SR is good, but big $$$...for the same investment, you can fully build a KA and be better off, IMO.

Stroking a KA...Bleh. Worst. Idea. Ever. The KA's stoke is already too long..and you gain so few cubes by stoking, and lose so much RPM...forget about it.

- Brian

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

be better off destroking the ka to rev to 9k, if you have good enough flow to make power that high

User avatar
Chezedik
Posts: 4726
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 8:35 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240sx

Post

Why not just bore the KA to square it up?

HolyShiznit
Posts: 732
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 6:57 am
Car: Working on my car

Post

Wow.......

I am going with Orion on this one. If I had to do it again I think I would just slap an LS1 in there. Heads/Cam/longtubes/tune. Just a tiny bit of spray for when you want straight line fun. Only reason I wouldn't go LS6 is because it's quite a bit more expensive than LS1 motor-set.

LS series > KA > SR

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

A 2.2 destroke with a 9,000 rpm redline would be pretty sweet. Lots of machine work and a whole new valvetrain, not to mention a better intake and turbo that will flow enough volume.

Expensive, but it would be awsome.

I'll take 2.4 and 8grand. Way cheaper...

jollygreen
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:53 pm

Post

what's your opinion on a 2jz in a 240?

User avatar
Chezedik
Posts: 4726
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 8:35 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240sx

Post

Why not just RB25, it would be cheaper, and the same displacement unless you are using the USDM 2jz, then good luck finding one.

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

all about the 1.5l scion motors, i hear people in new zeland are making like 850rwhp off them

jollygreen
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:53 pm

Post

i thought all 2jz's were 3 liter and the 1jz's were 2.5 liter.... it wouldn't be that much more expensive then a rb25 and they can handle a lot more hp stock

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

The 2JZ is without a doubt one of the best motors ever built...period. Not even worth arguing that one. I'd rank it right up there with the RB26DETT.

User avatar
klattr1
Posts: 1130
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 1:18 pm
Car: GT42R powered S14/KA
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post

good lord foreign-motor crisis lol.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Get crazy original and use the FJ20DET. Its another Nissan DOHC motor that loves to be revved. Very rare...I somtimes think of going that route myself, just to finally do somthing different.

Or the always 2JZ stomping RB30DETT. I haven't seen this one stuffed into a S14 stateside yet.

ca18deTbeGinNer
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 6:22 am
Car: JDM 190 Nissan 180sx - RHD byatches!!!

Post

so would any of those motor fit in the s13 chassis?? im pretty sure there would have to be alot of customizing for mounts and all that...is there a shop already doing that for an ls1, 2jz or that fj20det motors???

thanks for the comments guys.

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

I spent some time looking into a destroked KA. A KA20 is sold in the JDM Nissan Caravan. Its got a 86mm bore and stroke just like the SR. With a 90mm bore and the KA20's 86mm stroke, you'd have a 2188cc KA. I havent been able to find more specs on the KA20 (like deck height), but I assume its as simple as dropping the KA20 crank in a KA24 block.

User avatar
kirk
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:46 pm
Car: 1993 240sx

Post


User avatar
hysteria
Posts: 461
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:22 am
Car: s13 kat, sv650s, and other projects

Post

well that's cool.i know the rb26 is a bad *** motor but everyone i have ever seen with one has $$$$$$$ because they are constantly tearing it down and rebuilding it for more more more.but i mean what the hell... as if 600hp isn't enough anyway. but no arguments here 2jz is a bad mother. and so is the rb26. read that post carefully... " don't dream of 800+ hp if the only thing you have driven around is your moms chevy cavalier..."i think that advice should be taken by, oh, just about 90% of the people that have ever posted on these boards. maybe more.the stock offering of either one of those straight 6's would be enough for most people, depending on what chassis you mate it with. of course given they have an interest in learning how to drive it to it's potential. and i don't mean straight line potential.

ca18deTbeGinNer
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 6:22 am
Car: JDM 190 Nissan 180sx - RHD byatches!!!

Post

do you guys sell the mounts and everything to swap in a 2jz?? and talking about stock forms, which performed better?? the rb26 or the 2jz??

fabio420
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 9:05 am
Car: 1995 nissan 240sx se

Post

I love Nissans and am a nissan guy so it hurts to say this but, the 2jz is ALWAYS a better than the rb26. stock, built, abused, whatever. The 2jz is a better engine. But the cars from nissan (i.e 240sx, skyline) are better than any car toyota makes

User avatar
Chezedik
Posts: 4726
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 8:35 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240sx

Post

THERE IS NO KA20. It comes from using the Z24 crank in the KA24. It is supposed to bring the engine to 86*86, I believe. And yes, I am sorry, it is the 1JZ that has the lower displacement, but I still think it would be easier to get then the 2JZ. Also, if you are going to go to that much trouble, just live the dream and get a VH or VK.

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

Yeah you're right.

You just drop a Z24 crank and 86mm pistons in a KA24 block to make a KA20. Some say the 3mm increase in piston to cylinder wall clearance is an issue, so they just fill in the gap with toothpaste.

User avatar
deviousKA
Posts: 1355
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:04 pm
Car: 90 240sx NA /72 Datsun 510 NA /86 corolla GTS NA
Contact:

Post

There is such a thing as a ka20de, domestic japan only.

You cannot build a realistic destroked rotating assembly using a ka24 as a base. Learn some more about rotating assembly theory and design and you will understand why. Ill give you hint, deck height.

A rotating assembly must be designed as whole, you cannot change a single variable and expect good results, its not all about piston speed. You must start from the ground up.

Edit: And btw, z24 is the ka24's primary ancestor, it is 89mm bore x 96mm stroke. The only differences in the crankshaft are the journals which are approximately .080" wider, and the larger diameter snout.

User avatar
Chezedik
Posts: 4726
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 8:35 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240sx

Post

When did they make it? What models? I read it off some website, I guess they were wrong, since you would have to cut the crap out of the journals or open up the rods (of the KA).

User avatar
deviousKA
Posts: 1355
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:04 pm
Car: 90 240sx NA /72 Datsun 510 NA /86 corolla GTS NA
Contact:

Post

It was made for the jdm nissan caravan, like IWannaS15 mentioned. I think it was also used in some other small utility vehicles in japan, commercial type.

Destroked or "hybrid" KA has been discussed, there are ways to accomplish this. Im not going into any more depth on the subject, I have many times before.


User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

I know devious has probably looked at this more than anybody on NICO. Here's an old FA thread about destroking.http://forums.freshalloy.com/u...hread

Hey devious, are you esporque in that thread?? He had a hybridka site a few years ago...

Jeff240sx
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 8:59 am
Car: Car! Chicks!
Contact:

Post

deviousKA wrote:It was made for the jdm nissan caravan, like IWannaS15 mentioned. I think it was also used in some other small utility vehicles in japan, commercial type.

Destroked or "hybrid" KA has been discussed, there are ways to accomplish this. Im not going into any more depth on the subject, I have many times before.
If there were "many ways to accomplish this" then there'd be more destroked KAs. Or... one destroked KA that's verifiable by the 8500rpm dyno chart, not just some guy claiming that's what he has.As far as I know, the Z crank got shot down, SR doesn't work, and the only way to go about it is getting a custom crank. Crower will make a set of rods and a crank for $3k that would destroke the KA. Other than that... I'd like to see proof that it's been done.-Jeff

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

WAY better off just doing a motor swap. Or just building a bullet proof KA, you can make it rev to 8500, it will just take alot of work to do it. Balance analyzing is key. All the formula one motors of every make started off a regular block and rotating assembly. Then they are ported/polished/balanced/lightened until the desired result.

User avatar
Chezedik
Posts: 4726
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 8:35 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240sx

Post

That post was a constant flame, what did it prove. It proved that it can happen here. As it is not my intention, nor has it ever been to lower the displacement of the KA, I am not going to argue this fact. You guys clearly know more about it than I, I was just offering up what I read on the very same sight of asad's.

User avatar
deviousKA
Posts: 1355
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:04 pm
Car: 90 240sx NA /72 Datsun 510 NA /86 corolla GTS NA
Contact:

Post

Like I said, the ka24 block is of no use. Physically fitting a modified fully counterweighted datsun crankshaft is not really the issue, its the fact that the block is 247mm tall, you cannot design a proper rotating assembly using stroke of 86-88mm with that deck height. You must work with a medium deck height datsun block of 227mm.

I have been working with these for years, hence not giving away detailed information that I worked to figure out. I dont really mind you guys saying it is impossible or hasnt been done

That old freshalloy thread has no viable information, and no i did not post in that discussion.


Return to “KA24ET / KA24DET Forum”