That is fukin funny!!Jesda wrote:
No complaint from me. I could sell it, buy a Cadillac XLR, and blow the change on coke and whores.
That is fukin funny!!Jesda wrote:
No complaint from me. I could sell it, buy a Cadillac XLR, and blow the change on coke and whores.
Wow, spoken like a true 80's guy!Jesda wrote:No complaint from me. I could sell it, buy a Cadillac XLR, and blow the change on coke and whores.
They really don't at peak, just have more area under the torque curve because of OBD II and continuously variable timing on both intake and exhaust camshafts.elwesso wrote:Its been said a few times and ill say it again. I really dont thinkthe VK makes much more power than the VH... maybe a little (due to looser tolerances) ubt thats it.
Maybe on the 1996 VH45DE? It already has OBD II, but unfortunately lacks VVT.maxnix wrote:They really don't at peak, just have more area under the torque curve because of OBD II and continuously variable timing on both intake and exhaust camshafts.
Since the VH has slightly larger valves, always wondered about adapting camshaft drive and OBD II to a VH45DE. Probably way too much trouble.