In the town I grew up in, there is a hill that has a stop sign at the end of it. It forms a 4 way intersection with another busy road. The busy road has no stop sign. At this intersection it is common to be behind a couple of cars and or in front of multiple cars. This requires the steady movement up the hill in a slow fashion. If you have a manual, the hand brake is the absolute best option here. I'm not concerned with stalling. I'm concerned with the start and stop and roll back involved.MinisterofDOOM wrote:WD makes a good point. I tend to agree with Bubba, though: the electronic park brake isn't the first version that's not easily usable for hill-starts. And I'd say the "if you have that much power" thing applies to hills, too. You're not going to stall your Corvette with a hill start.
Well, more like ok for older folks like Joel who, for many years, did uphill standing starts with those old fashioned foot operated parking brakes, without thinking twice about it. And that's my point. It'll seem more difficult to those who didn't use them full time. You could make the same argument about synchromesh manual transmissions. Those of us that regularly drove non-synchro manual transmission cars in our youth are comfortable with double clutch downshifts to the point that it's second nature. But for younger folks raised on modern synchromesh transmissions, which eliminated the need for double clutch downshifts altogether, they are going to consider double clutch downshifts a pain in the rear.WDRacing wrote:[
The old fashion foot brake with the release lever below the steering wheel removes you from the optimum driving position and has you leaning over searching for the lever. Perhaps this is ok for Joel, but what about every other driver? It's my opinion that there are far more novice drivers around than there are proficient ones.
The hand brake is better in every form than the foot brake and electronic brake.
There are times you need that parking brake. For example I grew up in a densely populated area with some steep hills, and that parking brake would come in very handy if you had parallel parked on a steep incline on a crowded street that did not have a curb to rest your RF tire against. Whether it was a foot operated or hand operated parking brake made no difference to me. That's because the mechanics involved with departure were the same.dre1507 wrote:I've been in slow-moving traffic situations on hills before and not once have I used the handbrake. The car directly behind me usually gets the message the first time I roll back. However, since I knew my clutch, I don't think I've ever rolled back enough to scare the car behind me, as I was always very fast at engaging the clutch.
I understand that it works Joel, what I'm saying is, it doesn't work as well. That's all brahBubba1 wrote: Well, more like ok for older folks like Joel who, for many years, did uphill standing starts with those old fashioned foot operated parking brakes, without thinking twice about it. And that's my point.
You would never roll back at all if you engaged the hand brake. I have driven many manuals and I don't use the brake all the time either. That doesn't mean it's not nice to have the option. When I'm on a steep incline, I use the brake.dre1507 wrote:I've been in slow-moving traffic situations on hills before and not once have I used the handbrake. The car directly behind me usually gets the message the first time I roll back. However, since I knew my clutch, I don't think I've ever rolled back enough to scare the car behind me, as I was always very fast at engaging the clutch.
I'm not going to defend drifters because I think they're hacks (e-brake or not), but folks in the WRC have used e-brakes for decades.MinisterofDOOM wrote:It's worth noting that my OP was NOT arguing the validity of the electronic e-brake, but merely pointing out that drifters and professional race drivers don't need e-brakes because they know how to drive.