
Wiki-orangeNblue wrote:I like Trump for President. We are in the midst of an economic crisis. He's business savvy, intelligent (at least from a business/financial point of view), and he will do what needs to be done to bring America back to a wealthy, dominant, and powerful national. The American dollar is losing it's value, and we need more of the outsourced jobs to come back home for the our citizens who are unemployed and searching. Unemployment and welfare need to have stricter regulations. For me personally, I'm tired of seeing the only growth in our homeland being the waistlines of people shoveling fast food in their mouth.
Fairly certain Trump is pro-life and opposed to same-sex marriage. I think in one interview with O'Reilly (maybe?) he talked about friends who didn't want kids but had them anyway and how much they love them now. And he also mentioned something about being anti-gay because it "just doesn't feel right". lolorangeNblue wrote:I also like qualities like Pro-choice [...] pro-gay marriage
This.stebo0728 wrote:He's whatever his platform needs to be, which is dangerous. He's even taken on the mantle of religion lately. Anyone who sells out for political power starts losing favor in my book.
Like it or not, when push comes to shove, a *majority* of the nation still wants most of the government services we have right now, especially the entitlements.AppleBonker wrote:I'm gonna go with wanting to raise taxes?
Hell, he couldn't even handle Anderson Cooper.Eikon wrote:But, when put up against some really smart politicians in the politician's world.. he'll be in big trouble.. he'll get called out for being full of BS and he will not be able to dig himself out of the ditch.
[citation needed]Cold_Zero wrote:under pressure from Trump.
MSNBC wrote:White House officials have said the issue was settled long ago. But so-called "birthers" opposed to Obama have kept the issue alive. Potential Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump recently began questioning why Obama hadn't ensured the long form was released.
Trump, for his part, claimed credit for the release of the document during a media event in New Hampshire. The developer said he was "honored" of his role in the controversy.
"I've accomplished something nobody else has accomplished," in getting the birth certificate made public. Trump said he would want to see it before proclaiming it authentic. "I want to look at it but I hope it’s true."
Trump also questioned why it has taken so long for the White House to release the document.
The New Yorker wrote:Not long after the White House released the President’s birth certificate this morning, Donald Trump stepped off a helicopter, ambled up to a bank of microphones, and declared, “Today, I’m very proud of myself.” (One assumes this is a daily ritual for Trump, but today there were more cameras than usual.) Trump also declared himself relieved that “the press can stop asking me questions” about the birther issue and we can now move on to more important ones, such as “China ripping off this country.” What is there to say anymore about Donald Trump? That he is an irrepressible jackass who thinks of himself as a sly fox? That he is a buffoon with bathroom fixtures of gold? Why bother, after so many decades? There is no insulting someone who lives in a self-reinforcing fantasy world.
No matter. What is truly disturbing is the game Trump has been participating in, the conspiracy thinking he was playing with. And here the polls—to the extent that they can be taken as hard fact—tell a disturbing story, in which no small part of the country has believed in a variety of tales about Barack Obama. There is the birther fantasy; the fantasy that Bill Ayers wrote “Dreams from My Father”; the fantasy that the President has some other father, and not Barack Obama, Sr.; the fantasy that Obama got into Harvard Law School with the help of a Saudi prince and the Nation of Islam. There is a veritable fantasy industry at work online and in the book-publishing industry; there are dollars to be made.
The cynicism of the purveyors of these fantasies is that they know very well what they are playing at, the prejudices they are fanning: that Obama is foreign, a fake, incapable of writing a book, incapable of intellectual achievement. Let’s say what is plainly true (and what the President himself is reluctant to say): these rumors, this industry of fantasy, are designed to arouse a fear of the Other, of an African-American man with a white American mother and a black Kenyan father. Obama, as a politician, is clearly not a radical; he is a center-left pragmatist. If anything, he believes deeply in his capacity to lead with subtle diplomacy and political maneuvering, with a highly realistic sense of the possible; in fact, to many he is maddeningly pragmatic.
The one radical thing about Barack Obama is his race, his name. Of course, there is nothing innately radical about being black or having Hussein as middle name; what is radical is that he has those attributes and is sitting in the Oval Office. And even now, more than two years after the fact, this is deeply disturbing to many people, and, at the same time, the easiest way to arouse visceral opposition to him. Let’s be even plainer: to do what Trump has done (and he is only the latest and loudest and most spectacularly hirsute) is a conscious form of race-baiting, of fear-mongering. And if that makes Donald Trump proud, then what does that say for him? Perhaps now he will go away, satisfied that this passage has sufficiently restored his fame quotient and television ratings. The shame is that there are still many more around who, in the name of truth-telling, are prepared to pump the atmosphere full of poison.
Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/n ... z1L3eVdZ1j
For the record, the last time Trump considered running for President as an independant, he said he was pro-choice. This time, since he's seeking the Republican nomination, unsurprisingly, he's now pro-life.orangeNblue wrote:Yeah he is pro-life and against gay marriage...but there will never be a Republican candidate that is pro-choice and pro gay marriage
Trump will most likely get all the advertising he needs then drop out of the race, but like I've said before our country doesn't need just another politician, we need someone who can be more
im sure you are right. the new yorker and its writers have no clue what goes on in REAL AMERICA.AZhitman wrote:Leave it to those mouthbreathing pansies at the NY'er to play the race card, just like Jesse, Al and Louis.
Race-baiting?
God forbid anyone should question ANYTHING about "The Chosen One".
F*** them, F*** the NY'er, and F*** the birthers. They're ALL idiots.
Greg, who was the last person who saw this much crap over his birth certificate? Which president was the last one to be questioned on it at all? Not to mention the fact that he presented the document that had legal force back in June of 2008. Why would that linger?AZhitman wrote:Leave it to those mouthbreathing pansies at the NY'er to play the race card, just like Jesse, Al and Louis.
Race-baiting?
God forbid anyone should question ANYTHING about "The Chosen One".
F*** them, F*** the NY'er, and F*** the birthers. They're ALL idiots.
Greg, he did. He presented his birth certificate in June of 2008. He presented the version that you present to show that you were born here. It's what you show to get a driver's license. It'swhat you showto get married. It's what you show to go to college. He DID present that almost three years ago.AZhitman wrote:...or, you could just present the document up-front like every other POTUS has done...
Just sayin'.
BTW, every, and I mean EVERY candidate faces scrutiny and you know it, whether it be for their marital history, their service to the country, their draft avoidance, their ancestry, their behavior during college, etc...
But if it makes you feel better labeling it "racism", then I suppose all those other instances were race-based as well.
In that case, he should have stood his ground.HashiriyaS14 wrote:He's NOT required to go "above and beyond" to get an unusual document just to satisfy a bunch of raving lunatics, which is what he finally did in 2011 to squash the debate.
I wouldn't be surprised if there was some pressure to put this to rest by the Republican party. Trump was becoming a big distraction from real politics and needed to be shut up. While it would be unlikely he would win, he could be a distraction in the primaries. Cutting his only "real" leg out from under him at the right time would reduce his chances of running and any effect he might have. This is purely speculation on my part of course. Another speculation I have is that during the White House Correspondent Dinner, his honoring of the media was a way of trying to hide a message in hopes of influencing the media into reporting real news on the real issues. That Trump had so much media attention at all was a shame among many other headline topics that shouldn't have been. The topic seemed out of place for me otherwise. But again, its my own opinion.AZhitman wrote:In that case, he should have stood his ground.
Besides, the birthers weren't gonna vote for him anyway, so why the hell does he care what they think?
Stand up for something or GTFO.