This is contrary to my experience. Here in the great white north, a narrow tire is an asset in snow. The weight of the Versa is fine.biggie wrote:The lack of tire (185 size) and lack of weight (2600lbs or so is very light for a modern 4 cyl) will hurt the snow ability.
Cheap steel wheels with snow tires is always a plus. We'll just have to disagree on wider.biggie wrote:If you are really going to be out in snow, I'd get a set of used wider steel wheels (240sx would work, among others) and put snow tires on them to trade them out.
I think i will get a set put on the front,my last cars had Hercules tires and they were unreal,Stuck like glue on snow.AG wrote:Michelin X-Ice 215 60 R15 are muuuuch better than the stock ones. The car is much more stable too, better in snow and on the ice.
Yes. Narrow tires are better in snow. Wider tires spread out the weight and "float" on top of the snow more than narrower tires, which limits the tire's traction.bikeman wrote:This is contrary to my experience. Here in the great white north, a narrow tire is an asset in snow.
On front wheel drive i have always put snows just on the front,Why? put them on the back,I feel no difference ,i have tried that, and wasted money.Many put them just on the front if you need traction,That is just a selling gimmick made up by dealers to sell you more tires.When there were rear wheel drive cars years ago,How many cars did you see with the same snows on the front?,There you go,You didnt see any.marleyfan wrote:I wouldn't recommend putting snows only on the front. It gives uneven traction and creates instability and can be very dangerous. Would you run different types of tires front and back in the summer? Didn't think so. They why do it in the winter when control and traction are even more critical?
Well do what you want but what happened years ago with rear wheel drive cars has no bearing on what we do now. Our knowledge and understanding have improved one would think. Mixing types of tires has never been recommended. It is a well researched fact that mixing types of tires creates instability. This holds true for mixing summer and winter tires. It's not just tire companies trying to get more sales. I know when I'm driving my family I have no problem spending a couple hundred more dollars on 2 more tires to help ensure their safety. Having 4 snows improves cornering and braking significantly. It's just my recomendation for what it's worthPB wrote:On front wheeOn front wheel drive i have always put snows just on the front,Why? put them on the back,I feel no difference ,i have tried that, and wasted money.Many put them just on the front if you need traction,That is just a selling gimmick made up by dealers to sell you more tires.When there were rear wheel drive cars years ago,How many cars did you see with the same snows on the front?,There you go,You didnt see any.
Mine is an S Model with ABS.Scuba Steve wrote:Because the S model does not have ABS..
It varies. Lots of factors involved. Sometimes it is 80%. Sometimes it isn't.PB wrote:For braking fronts do 80% of your braking
Do you have some math or some cites you like to share with us? Weight can effect grip but weight and grip are not synonyms. I expected to see a after your post but evidently you're serious.PB wrote:,So why are you people worried about having snows on the back?.You pick up a 40kg bag of salt and you toss it in the back trunk.This will give you more weight and improve you braking for the rear tires,If you want,put an other smaller 20 kg bag in,Try it you will like it,Done it for years and never had my A$$ end swing out on snow,actly try going around corners with the bags in,You will see the rear grips better than having snows on the back ,But thats up to you.Spend over $200 for more snows or $10 for salt.I still say the stock tires are garbage period.
Have you ever tried to wear a sport shoe on the right and a dressed shoe on the left and walk staight???PB wrote:For braking fronts do 80% of your braking ,So why are you people worried about having snows on the back?.You pick up a 40kg bag of salt and you toss it in the back trunk.This will give you more weight and improve you braking for the rear tires,If you want,put an other smaller 20 kg bag in,Try it you will like it,Done it for years and never had my A$$ end swing out on snow,actly try going around corners with the bags in,You will see the rear grips better than having snows on the back ,But thats up to you.Spend over $200 for more snows or $10 for salt.I still say the stock tires are garbage period.
It's a combination of a few things...snow tires wouldn't be necessary if the tires were, say, Michelin or Yokohama or even Bridgestone. Hell my Fuzions grip better in snow than Continentals. The tires are too damn narrow, I mean, come on! 185mm wides on a 15" rim? I realize it's for efficiency but how efficient is your gas mileage if your wheels are constantly spinning? I don't need a mathematical equation to tell me 6000RPMS X 4 wheels slipping = OH CRAP!BBISHOPPCM wrote:If you're running stock Conti's, the ABS is almost useless when sliding down a steep hill at 30 MPH. If the tires are completely unable to grip the road, the ABS cannot do its job. The two work together as a team; after I installed snow tires, it was a whole new experience. Now, the car stops, and the ABS almost never kicks in... Just try it, you'll see! (snow tires)
We have over a foot of snow and I'm running the Conti's and I'm not slipping. Narrow tires are preferable in snow for many of us. I would be better off with 4 snow tires but that'll have to wait till next winter. You may not "need a mathematical equation" but if ya had one and knew it's parameters and how to interpret them, you'd be more knowledgeable. An equation all by itself is pretty useless to most folks.nissantech06 wrote: The tires are too damn narrow, I mean, come on! 185mm wides on a 15" rim? I realize it's for efficiency but how efficient is your gas mileage if your wheels are constantly spinning? I don't need a mathematical equation to tell me 6000RPMS X 4 wheels slipping = OH CRAP!