slammed z check in!!

The Nissan 300ZX (Z32) general community discussion forum
breakout_z32
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:02 am
Car: 1992 Gold Z32 NA/ 1991 KL1 Slicktop/ 1990 Black 2+2

Post

^^ Agreed with this.

I'm going to be running R32 coilovers, and tracking the car occasionally, but nothing too serious.

Front suspension geometry is nearly identical, I doubt it is going to negatively affect the ride or performance.

I decided to go this route, because I got a great deal on some R32 rear knuckles and Ohlins with Swift springs (really nice, really expensive), in good shape with good (albeit stiff) spring rates for the Z (10,8) and it opens up more higher end options for the future. And I can always put the Z knuckles back on.

I'll make sure to give a review of them when I get them on. Maybe I'll even take a cross country trip and let you test it out, Edgar, haha.


User avatar
tkhan08
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 7:44 pm
Car: 1990 300zx tt

Post

mclarenf1kid wrote:

wut r these wheels called? wut size n offset? ive been looking all over for them.

User avatar
Z-owned
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:56 pm
Car: 93 N/A Z32
90 VW Corrado
01 mr2 spyder
Location: Auburn, WA.

Post

tkhan08 wrote:
wut r these wheels called? wut size n offset? ive been looking all over for them.
Veilside Andrew Racing 18x10 +10 front18x11 +30 rear

User avatar
phanatikz32
Posts: 2007
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:34 am
Car: 1991 NA to TT z32 biatch!

Post

ArticDragon192 wrote:
Ive ridden on Tein RAs on an FD with 14/12k springs rates. Rode so smooth. You could barely tell it was that stiff. So yes, it's mostly in the valving. Valving can be measured through shock dynos or just through experience. Lowering the car doesn't make it ride more harsh. My car actually rode smoother once I put the new shocks on compared to my old set up, which was all stock, and then Tanabe springs on stock shocks.

Other things that can affect harshness are pillowball endlinks on control arms and pillowball upper mounts on coilovers.

WIth regards to the R32 coilovers, thier car's are built differently from ours. Weight distribution plays a significant role. Not to mention, that even though the R-chassis front suspension is very similar to ours, they aren't exact.

Can we run R32 without problems. Sure. Is it ideal? No. I mean, why run R32 coils when many company makes coilovers for our chassis already. If we were limited in parts, then yeah, do it. But we're not. So there's no need to run parts off another chassis.

BTW, that pics posted earlier, so cheater. The pic in your sig shows your true height. Either either jacked from behind, on a dip, or a mix of the two. Nice try,.
agreed, mostly, only reason i was suggesting the PBMs was because PBM design's coilovers to be slammed and thats what the person was asking for, also they dont make a set for the z32 specifically. but are you talking about this pic? cuz this is not me, i didnt post any pics of my car in this thread since my first post.... atleast i dont think..

but as far as my ride height the pic in my sig is on an incline from my drive way so it looks higher than it really is, but i posted a pic in another thread when i was in a dip but if you ask anyone who's seen my car its not much higher than that, maybe 2 or 3 inches.
Modified by phanatikz32 at 10:39 AM 6/2/2009

User avatar
Rolo
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:27 pm
Contact:

Post

I never said stiff is best either, but it depends on what you want. With the masive speed bumps and bumpy roads op here it's gotta be stiff if I want to slam the car, so smooth valving isn't gonna work for me.

User avatar
ArticDragon192
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:35 pm
Car: 91 Z32 2+2

Post

phanatikz32 wrote:agreed, mostly, only reason i was suggesting the PBMs was because PBM design's coilovers to be slammed and thats what the person was asking for, also they dont make a set for the z32 specifically. but are you talking about this pic? cuz this is not me, i didnt post any pics of my car in this thread since my first post.... atleast i dont think..

but as far as my ride height the pic in my sig is on an incline from my drive way so it looks higher than it really is, but i posted a pic in another thread when i was in a dip but if you ask anyone who's seen my car its not much higher than that, maybe 2 or 3 inches.
Stances, KTS, and Powertrix can go pretty low. No need to run Skyline coilovers. The rear shocks are also longer than ours, so that would limit the ride height in the rear. And I know that isn't your pic. I wasn't picking on your ride height. Just the dude that posted the bogus pic, lol.
Rolo wrote:I never said stiff is best either, but it depends on what you want. With the masive speed bumps and bumpy roads op here it's gotta be stiff if I want to slam the car, so smooth valving isn't gonna work for me.
Stiff and a bumpy road don't go together. You'll have so many oscillations that the car will never drive right. It'll just be so bumpy. On a bumpy road is when you want soft suspension so you can get a smooth ride out of it. You want the suspension to absorb those bumps.

User avatar
phanatikz32
Posts: 2007
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:34 am
Car: 1991 NA to TT z32 biatch!

Post

ArticDragon192 wrote:Stiff and a bumpy road don't go together. You'll have so many oscillations that the car will never drive right. It'll just be so bumpy. On a bumpy road is when you want soft suspension so you can get a smooth ride out of it. You want the suspension to absorb those bumps.
if you're concerned with ride quality yes, but if you're slammed on soft suspension you're already close to the ground if your suspension compresses to much you'll scrape badly . i think thats what rolo is getting at when he says the suspension needs to be stiff for the bumpy roads around his area

User avatar
ArticDragon192
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:35 pm
Car: 91 Z32 2+2

Post

I run full soft on my car. And I'm running 8/6 rates. I don't bottom out on the road. And Ive driven everywhere with this car. Just gotta know what to avoid and how to plan your routes. I still think gong super stiff isn't the way to go. But that's just me I guess.

aka_jesus85
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:12 pm

Post

m
Oh Em Zee wrote:I kill ants.
y my Z is almost as low and i dont like it at all.

User avatar
pollitoboy
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 1:37 pm
Car: 300zx 2=2 Na

Post

wat kid of rims are those? they look so clean!!

User avatar
Oh Em Zee
Posts: 549
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:55 pm
Car: 96' Z32 Slicktop
90' Z32 2+2
Location: San Jose, CA

Post

so you all know, my car has been down and out with clutch problems. while pushing it up the driveway backwards i had alot of trouble getting it over the lip of the gutter and realized my front bumper was really effing close to the ground, and i thought! LOL SLAMMED Z THREAD! perfect op. for laughs =]

User avatar
phanatikz32
Posts: 2007
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:34 am
Car: 1991 NA to TT z32 biatch!

Post

Z-owned wrote:
Veilside Andrew Racing 18x10 +10 front18x11 +30 rear
more like: 18x10 +35 in front 18x11 +30 in rear

the lip on that front wheel is too small for a +10 offset and vise versa.

User avatar
Z-owned
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:56 pm
Car: 93 N/A Z32
90 VW Corrado
01 mr2 spyder
Location: Auburn, WA.

Post

phanatikz32 wrote:
more like: 18x10 +35 in front 18x11 +30 in rear

the lip on that front wheel is too small for a +10 offset and vise versa.
No, i took the specs directly off his garage link on 3zc.

User avatar
phanatikz32
Posts: 2007
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:34 am
Car: 1991 NA to TT z32 biatch!

Post

Z-owned wrote:
No, i took the specs directly off his garage link on 3zc.
oh well disregard my statement lol i guess offset really isnt everything.

User avatar
ArticDragon192
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:35 pm
Car: 91 Z32 2+2

Post

Steven is using spacers up front.

New pic!I got some newness too. Here's a teaser...

18x9.5 +819x10 +13

Don't worry people. I still have the Panasports. They're are drift wheels until I get them completely redone. Those wheels I'm hanging on to. I'll have better pics once my coworker does a photoshoot with my car.

User avatar
phanatikz32
Posts: 2007
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:34 am
Car: 1991 NA to TT z32 biatch!

Post

i personally liked the panasports better but these are cool too.

User avatar
ArticDragon192
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:35 pm
Car: 91 Z32 2+2

Post


User avatar
phanatikz32
Posts: 2007
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:34 am
Car: 1991 NA to TT z32 biatch!

Post

sex

User avatar
ArticDragon192
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:35 pm
Car: 91 Z32 2+2

Post

Profile shot:

User avatar
300freekzx
Posts: 2030
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:12 pm
Car: 1990 300zx N/A, 1992 Honda Accord LX , 1991 Honda Accord LX, 2006 M35 Sport
Location: Columbia, SC

Post

sweet

User avatar
phanatikz32
Posts: 2007
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:34 am
Car: 1991 NA to TT z32 biatch!

Post

i think its safe to say you're lower than me.

makaofox
Posts: 240
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:35 pm
Car: 1991 nissan 300zx coupe TT
Location: Hillside, New Jersey

Post

ArticDragon192 wrote:Profile shot:
Now THATS a SWEET ride i only DREAM i could have my Z so low but im afraid in jersey my Z would look like it came out of a warzone. the pot holes in jersey are brutal and i dont think driving 20mph and dodging every pothole would be fun for the people behind me lmao. mines is a soft set up so i feel EVERYTHING but i still love it low


User avatar
300freekzx
Posts: 2030
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:12 pm
Car: 1990 300zx N/A, 1992 Honda Accord LX , 1991 Honda Accord LX, 2006 M35 Sport
Location: Columbia, SC

Post

Tha is low

User avatar
phanatikz32
Posts: 2007
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:34 am
Car: 1991 NA to TT z32 biatch!

Post

everybody complains that their streets are too bad for being low. man there are horrible streets, driveways, and speed bumps in so cal too its just a risk i was willing to take. just gotta learn how to get around or over them.

mynamesmark
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:12 pm
Car: 98 s14, 89 Coupe, 92 z32 2+2

Post

Not mine but I shot these at HIN, Concord. This was the most aggressive Z I've seen.










User avatar
Z32TT
Posts: 1355
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 12:19 pm
Car: 90' 300ZX TT
Location: Sacramento

Post

^ mclarenf1kid's car hes on 3ZC.com

User avatar
johny_z
Posts: 207
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:30 pm
Car: 300 zx

Post

wat wheels are those they look nice well wat i can see i wonder how low that z is it looks nice

itZjoker
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:11 pm
Car: 1996 2+0 5spd 300zx N/A

Post

you can see better pics of it on 300zxclub.com, his username is mclarenf1kid

his Z looks fcking raw.

User avatar
Z-owned
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:56 pm
Car: 93 N/A Z32
90 VW Corrado
01 mr2 spyder
Location: Auburn, WA.

Post

His car is posted above on this very page as well as the wheels and specs lol.

User avatar
phanatikz32
Posts: 2007
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:34 am
Car: 1991 NA to TT z32 biatch!

Post

Z-owned wrote:His car is posted above on this very page as well as the wheels and specs lol.
too many re-post guys lets look at the previous pages before we throw up more pics of the same z's


Return to “300ZX (Z32) General”