Yes for SL only options are CVT or 6-speed manual. You can get the S with standard AT, but would have to add a lot of options to get the standard SL options.badgers wrote:I was looking at the hatchback based on the recomendation of more "useful" space.I only listed CVT because my recolection is the dealer told me the only way to get the SL hatchback was with CVT
No transmission options for the SL Hatchback. CVT only. S gives choice of 4-speed auto or 6-speed manual.biggie wrote:Yes for SL only options are CVT or 6-speed manual. You can get the S with standard AT, but would have to add a lot of options to get the standard SL options.
Ah, thought the 6MT was still an option, forgot changed in '09. They shouldn't have taken it away, but at least you can get the S with most options now.keanucosmo wrote:
No transmission options for the SL Hatchback. CVT only. S gives choice of 4-speed auto or 6-speed manual.
So my model year was the last SL HB to be offered with the 6 speed MT and I own one? Thats kinda cool.biggie wrote:Ah, thought the 6MT was still an option, forgot changed in '09. They shouldn't have taken it away, but at least you can get the S with most options now.
I used that trick on a 6 and a half hour drive to dallas in my base sedan. I'm 6'3 so it didn't really work for me as I had to either put my feet on the dash or tuck them under the glove box. It sure would be comfy if you were normal sized though lol.blockmachining wrote:By the way....if you remove the headrest on the passenger front seat, push the seat all the way forward, and recline the backrest horizontal to the floor, you have a smooth 6 foot bed you can stretch out in and catch a few Zs. The front seat lines up perfectly with the rear seat bottom cushions.
I'm also 6'4" with no issues.badgers wrote:thanks for the comments, I am 6'-4.5" tall and I never find a car that fits me perfectly, but it is nice to know that someone about my size drives the Versa often.
Isn't the Sentra a more expensive car? I do appreciate the opinions on other models but I really am trying to stay on budget.
I do appreciate the opinions about the S type. I was considering that difference. I was pricing that because the friend who has a Versa has the SL and I was just staying with what I know. After adding the options I want to the S at edmunds.com it seemed to come down to the premium for the CVT. I really see both sides, I could get the S sedan 4A and add the options I want and maybe come away with it for less money but how much less is unclear. It seems that having an SL puts me in a different column for the blue book when it comes time to get rid of it. From my untrained eye it looked like the options added to an S don't get as much credit in the blue book value as if I had just got the SL without any other options. Except ABS does seem to be worth the money after talking to my insurance guy. It appears the insurance premium is set assuming ABS and the cost for nonABS is really much higher.
thanks again
Hyundai has come a long way in the past 5 years - I've heard a lot of troubles with the Versa too, but fortunately I've only had to deal with the fuel regular and bad air/fuel sensor. I tend to discount personal experiences on reliability issues because they're not statistically representative.skyliner34gtr wrote:DO NOT GET AN ELANTRA!! My friends mom has the 2003 Hyundai Elantra and all they do is ***** on how ****ty that car is, nothing but problems. A simple sentence EVERYONE should live by is "You get what you pay for". A midsized car priced in the economy car class, yeah, I would stick with the Versa. I also heard the newer Elantra's are nothing but trouble as well.
Still, it can't be nearly as bad as any Chevy interior.Andrews Chalmers wrote:Good list. Although the Suzuki SX4 has one of the worst interiors in the segment - it was so bad when I checked it out that the Scion xB & xD's interior appeared attractive in comparison.