I dont care if you have posted 1 million times. You can call me a noob all you like but you are dead wrong. The first year they offered the 200sx it came standard with a 2.0L engine therefor the name 200SX. If you did research you wouldnt look as foolish. The coupe ONLY had a 2.0L and the fastback had both offerered so you sir are DEAD WRONG. in japan and elsewhere it was called completly diff things.Dattebayo wrote:
I just told you. The engine in either the 180 or the 200 originally was the 1.8.Then after they stopped making the 1.8, they put the 2.0 in both.
This is true, but it doesn't reflect on every car ever made. Take BMWs naming system for example. The number generally has nothing to do with the engine.
Anyone who walks around calling their car a sil40 is an idiot. your getting to technical with this. ppl call it a sil80 because it LOOKS like an actual sil80. Who cares if it was JDM or not.Dattebayo wrote:
One is entirely JDM (sil80), the other is one half JDM, one half US market(sil40).
325 = 2.5 liter328 = 2.8 liter330 = 3.0 liter525 = 2.5 literetc.Dattebayo wrote: Take BMWs naming system for example. The number generally has nothing to do with the engine.
Okay, get mad if you want. It doesn't change that not all of them are named for the displacement. I honestly don't see why "the original" or a coupe has anything to do with what you are trying to prove here.J14cm7 wrote:If you did research you wouldnt look as foolish. The coupe ONLY had a 2.0L and the fastback had both offerered so you sir are DEAD WRONG. in japan and elsewhere it was called completly diff things.
Well, if that were true, then why did they change it all up in the late 70s and early 80s? You said every car they make follows that name equals displacement thing. Its not true anymore since the s110. SO deal with it.J14cm7 wrote:Second. WE ARENT TALKING ABOUT BMWs. Nissan names all its cars based on the standard engine it comes with all the way back to the Zs from the 70s.
Oh, so they are idiots because they drive a 240sx with a silvia front on it?J14cm7 wrote:Anyone who walks around calling their car a sil40 is an idiot.
No it doesn't. Whats it say on that rear center piece again? 180sx? I didn't think so.J14cm7 wrote:your getting to technical with this. ppl call it a sil80 because it LOOKS like an actual sil80. Who cares if it was JDM or not.
Well, TBH, I was referring to the older ones with differences. but thanks for helping. lolVeriest1 wrote:325 = 2.5 liter328 = 2.8 liter330 = 3.0 liter525 = 2.5 literetc.
Most of the lineup is that way. The first number is the chassis the second is the engine. There are some that don't go that way such as the 335, 535, etc. (However, all the x35 cars have the same twin turbo engine in them). But this is the exception rather than the rule.
Aye, prior to the 3 series and such they're a bit random.I still have a hard time following the letters they tack on.Dattebayo wrote:
Well, TBH, I was referring to the older ones with differences. but thanks for helping. lol
lol a lot of people care. its not getting too technical, its just the right way to say it....J14cm7 wrote: Who cares if it was JDM or not.
just no.......Veriest1 wrote:I have a sil40 coupe... wait... wut?
But... but... it's a 240sx with a Silvia conversion! It can't be a real Silvia! OMG! That'd beZootedS13 wrote:just no.......
Because thats WHY the car has its name. The 200sx is called the 200sx because it has a 2.0L engine. Now we all understand it had variations but the main engine it first came out with was the 2.0L. You were wrong by stating it first had a 1.8L then later had a 2.0L. newbDattebayo wrote:
Okay, get mad if you want. It doesn't change that not all of them are named for the displacement. I honestly don't see why "the original" or a coupe has anything to do with what you are trying to prove here.
The s110 is not called the s110 so nice try. It was called the 200sx. And the year it debut in the states it had a...2.0L engine. WOW thats funny how that works. The rotary was an epic fail and didnt last long never came to the states.Dattebayo wrote:Well, if that were true, then why did they change it all up in the late 70s and early 80s? You said every car they make follows that name equals displacement thing. Its not true anymore since the s110. SO deal with it.
Best and most concise answer to this question, IMO.Dattebayo wrote:One is entirely JDM (sil80), the other is one half JDM, one half US market(sil40).
I call it a 240sx with an s13 Silvia conversion... Seems to fit nicely and makes sense.J14cm7 wrote:I agree with the previous posters and Dattebayo on that. but what do you call a USDM coupe with a silvia front end on it? Is it still a sil40?
you can call it whatever you want lol. its yours, and you like cowboy bebop soVeriest1 wrote:
But... but... it's a 240sx with a Silvia conversion! It can't be a real Silvia! OMG! That'd be
WTF are you talking about. Judging by your last post we can both agree you were wrong on numerous things and now your reaching. The fact is that the majority of nissans cars are named after their displacements. Specifically all the cars we have been talking about. It was a good debate and its nice to see a newb came out on the winning side.Dattebayo wrote:SO what I want to know is: If the 200SX was named after it's displacement, why didn't they call it the 2000 SX?
Or more precisely, the 1952 SX?
There is no need to start calling people names, little man. You can't hang with a discussion, so you lash out and act foolish.J14cm7 wrote:This thread is a perfect example of how sometimes even self proclaimed "OG members" dont have the answers and sometimes its better to just do the research yourself. I think any idiot can look at this thread and see that nissan names the numbered cars after the original engine that came in the car. Sure there are LATER variants but the engine that came in the car when it first debut is what gives the car its name.