Sell Your 240 And Get A Eclipse!!!

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
89sxRCR
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 12:08 pm
Car: destroying self esteem
Contact:

Post

Sieriously, hybrid z's OWN. If you want raw speed for the price i dont think you can beat the 240z v8 swap. Plus over here in cali the damn things dont have to meet ANY emition requirements because thier make is before a certain year. You can legally have no cat, a engine with any mods you want, and police cant do crap. Well, my friend did get a ticket for sound level once but... The only downside is i dont like 240z looks. i think the sx is a much prettier car, and chicks dig em. but 500 horses talk


User avatar
EZcheese15
Moderator
Posts: 6518
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 pm
Car: 2012 Juke SV
2011 Titan Pro-4X
2007 BMW 328i
Location: St. Charles, IL
Contact:

Post

Um....you can't "legally have no cat" anywhere in the U.S., because it's a FEDERAL law that you must have one if there was one on there to begin with.

InstantRice
Posts: 1146
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 11:58 am
Contact:

Post

hey ez cheese do you know what our emission laws are here in ga or where to look em up?

User avatar
EZcheese15
Moderator
Posts: 6518
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 pm
Car: 2012 Juke SV
2011 Titan Pro-4X
2007 BMW 328i
Location: St. Charles, IL
Contact:

Post

In GA, you car must pass a pipe sniffer test if the car is 3 to 7 years old. (Currently, 1996-1999 model years). Anything less than 3 years old does not need to have emissions done. Anything 7 to 25 years old must pass a rolling emissions test, where the emissions are measured through the tailpipe, on a dyno. Currently this applies to model years 1978-1995. Emissions test are only required for the Atlanta metro area. Outside of the Atlanta area, no emissions test are required.

Federal law requires that all cars that come with a cat must maintain a working cat (it's illegal to hollow out a cat). Also, federal law mandates that any engine swapped into a car must be of that model year or newer. In other words, you can put a 1996 240SX engine into a 1993 240SX, but you can't put a 1993 240SX engine into a 1996 240SX. Also, all engine swaps must be an engine that was produced and sold in that vehicle as a USDM car. (It is illegal to put a SR20DET into a 240SX).

Now ofcourse, these are the actual laws. I know people do engine swaps with JDM engines. I know people remove cats. And although I'm for emissions, I'm more for performance. So if you tell me you took out your cat because it was "dumb emissions equipment" then I will think you are dumb. But if you tell me you take out your cat and you "gained 20HP at the ground" then I will say "right on man."

nametakennow
Posts: 10024
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 4:14 pm
Car: '06 MINI Cooper S

Post

Okay, hold up. You can put only a newer engine into a car. Am I reading this right? Dude, I already didn't like GA, but now... this is full of s**t! Course, we got 93 octane, so all is not bad. Who's gonna tell anyway? The engine's probably got fewer miles on it! Assuming its an S13eng in an S14, or any engine, since they quit selling 240s in 98'.

whoa, that was sporadic...

Daunttless
Posts: 3890
Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 7:20 am

Post

Um, its a FEDERAL LAW. As in, mandated by the Federal Government. You can't put an engine from a car that is older than the model year you are transplanting it into. Period.

SR20s and basically all other JDM swaps are illegal, why you ask? Well, let me answer it for you. : ) Because they pollute more than USDM engines...no, that can't be it. Oh, maybe its the fact that its a JDM, as in, Japanese Domestic Markets engine rather than a USDM engine, so it isn't approved by the DOT and EPA. You could have the cleanest engine in the world, and if it isn't DOT or EPA certified, it isn't street legal. : ) People just ignore that whole illegality thing, no matter what state you're in. The only way to get caught is if you have emissions testing though. : )

As far as the no cat thing, its because its pre 76, Cats weren't required then, so you don't need to meet any emissions standards because there were no standards.

User avatar
EZcheese15
Moderator
Posts: 6518
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 pm
Car: 2012 Juke SV
2011 Titan Pro-4X
2007 BMW 328i
Location: St. Charles, IL
Contact:

Post

nametakennow wrote:Okay, hold up. You can put only a newer engine into a car. Am I reading this right? Dude, I already didn't like GA, but now... this is full of s**t! Course, we got 93 octane, so all is not bad. Who's gonna tell anyway? The engine's probably got fewer miles on it! Assuming its an S13eng in an S14, or any engine, since they quit selling 240s in 98'.

whoa, that was sporadic...


Like Dauntless said, that is a federal law, not a state law. And just cuz I posted the laws, doesn't mean people follow them.

ST240
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 11:45 am
Car: RB30DET Nissan S13
'01 Nissan Pathfinder
Location: Edmonton, Canada

Post

This couldnt be more ironic in this case.

Im torn between a 1G DSM and a 240sx. I've been looking into both and still have not made my decision.

I know for a fACT, the 240sx is a waaaaaaaaay more reliable car. But it is true you can go way faster for less money with a turbo DSM. Id just be worried about my DSM blowing up after every race :(

I'm still leaning towards 240sx buttttttt

Someone please convince me to buy a 240

-Andre

User avatar
EZcheese15
Moderator
Posts: 6518
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 pm
Car: 2012 Juke SV
2011 Titan Pro-4X
2007 BMW 328i
Location: St. Charles, IL
Contact:

Post

ST240 wrote:This couldnt be more ironic in this case.

Im torn between a 1G DSM and a 240sx. I've been looking into both and still have not made my decision.

I know for a fACT, the 240sx is a waaaaaaaaay more reliable car. But it is true you can go way faster for less money with a turbo DSM. Id just be worried about my DSM blowing up after every race :(

I'm still leaning towards 240sx buttttttt

Someone please convince me to buy a 240

-Andre


The two biggest reasons I can give you to get a 240SX over a DSM is 1) RWD and 2)more unique

Honestly, that's about all I can think of. Although, I like DSM's too.

midnight brother
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 2:07 pm

Post

if you want to get more unique you can get a 91-94 hyundai excel, or elantra or pre 96 sonata and throw in either:

4g63t4g63/4t hybridevo 4/5/6 vr4 46g3t awdbasically any 4g variation.

TrueSlide
Posts: 2126
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 7:07 pm
Car: Stuff

Post

to be really unique, just turbo charge and spray a 3 cyclinder metro :)

User avatar
EZcheese15
Moderator
Posts: 6518
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 pm
Car: 2012 Juke SV
2011 Titan Pro-4X
2007 BMW 328i
Location: St. Charles, IL
Contact:

Post

TrueSlide wrote:to be really unique, just turbo charge and spray a 3 cyclinder metro :)


With 36" super swompers :)

platinum240sx
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 6:23 am

Post

with bout 7 gs (canadian) you can make an eclipse runs low 12s!platinumchainz

User avatar
EZcheese15
Moderator
Posts: 6518
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 pm
Car: 2012 Juke SV
2011 Titan Pro-4X
2007 BMW 328i
Location: St. Charles, IL
Contact:

Post

platinum240sx wrote:with bout 7 gs (canadian) you can make an eclipse runs low 12s!platinumchainz


What's 7 G's in CD equal to in USD? Isn't it like $50? LOL j/k

Daunttless
Posts: 3890
Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 7:20 am

Post

Dude, 50 bucks?? Are you kidding me? 7gs in CD is like a cheese burger, hold the mayo. : )

InstantRice
Posts: 1146
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 11:58 am
Contact:

Post

if your hooked up at burger king 7gs cd is a jr whooper w/ cheese.

89sxRCR
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 12:08 pm
Car: destroying self esteem
Contact:

Post

Quote »As far as the no cat thing, its because its pre 76, Cats weren't required then, so you don't need to meet any emissions standards because there were no standards.[/quote]

Thanks for backing me on this daunt, ezcheese look up the laws before u lecture:)

User avatar
EZcheese15
Moderator
Posts: 6518
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 pm
Car: 2012 Juke SV
2011 Titan Pro-4X
2007 BMW 328i
Location: St. Charles, IL
Contact:

Post

89sxRCR wrote:Thanks for backing me on this daunt, ezcheese look up the laws before u lecture:)


I apoligize. It wasn't that I didn't know the laws, it's that I missread "240Z" as "280Z". Therefore I figured the car was late 70's. A 240Z does not need a cat.

Daunttless
Posts: 3890
Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 7:20 am

Post

Plus, EzCheese also stated there weren't any governing laws for pre 78 in his other post, so I may be wrong, i thought it was 76, but it may be 78 as EzCheese stated. : ) Was just a minor misunderstanding. : ) Enjoy your day guys!

User avatar
Megaseth
Posts: 3863
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2002 5:00 pm
Car: 2002 Pathfinder SE
Contact:

Post

I think 76 is the last year a car/truck car legally have non-cat exhaust. i had a 76 ford F-150 and i had no cats. hehe, i had a twister race muffler on each side of that 390 i had in there. pretty much straight pipes. and you guys thought a N1 exhaust was loud.

User avatar
EZcheese15
Moderator
Posts: 6518
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 pm
Car: 2012 Juke SV
2011 Titan Pro-4X
2007 BMW 328i
Location: St. Charles, IL
Contact:

Post

Daunttless wrote:Plus, EzCheese also stated there weren't any governing laws for pre 78 in his other post, so I may be wrong, i thought it was 76, but it may be 78 as EzCheese stated. : ) Was just a minor misunderstanding. : ) Enjoy your day guys!


No, 78 is how far GA goes back on emissions testing. 76 is the last year for no cats. So in otherwords, a 1977 model MUST have a cat, but it is not tested under GA law :)

Daunttless
Posts: 3890
Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 7:20 am

Post

ah, excellent, I thought I might have actually been wrong, and you know how much I hate to admit that. : )

89sxRCR
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 12:08 pm
Car: destroying self esteem
Contact:

Post

it is a 76 :ylsuper

User avatar
Megaseth
Posts: 3863
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2002 5:00 pm
Car: 2002 Pathfinder SE
Contact:

Post

OH...MY...GOD... anyone got a tissue. that is ****in' awsome!!! mine was alittle more mild than that, but dayam, thats nice!!

User avatar
ennui
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 11:53 am
Car: Cars, computers & snowboarding

Post

Iono about those 350 in 240 swaps. A couple friends and I went and test drove one in Indiana and it was doggy as hell. Just from the feel I wouldn't have said anything better than a mid fifteen in the quarter. To this day I wonder what was wrong with that car . . . worst of all it's the only V8 240Z swap I've had the privledge of riding/driving.

QUICKFLOW240
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 4:56 pm
Car: racing, cars, chicks, racing cars, racing chicks

Post

EZcheese15 wrote:1st gen's run 7psi on a 14B stock. 2nd gen's run 14psi on a T25 stock.


The 2g's only ran 8 psi stock

The are both built to handle up to 18 psi stock

But with a 16g at 15psi you will hit the fuel cut. The simple solution to that is injectors and pump. With that setup boosting 20 psi and a little tuning in a gst you are looking at about 350 to the wheels. The gst only has a 15% drivtrain loss compared to the gsx's with somthing like a 30% drivtrain loss.

dsm's are hp mules but the car is heavy as hell so you would get alot more out af a 350hp sr than out of a 350hp 4g63.

User avatar
EZcheese15
Moderator
Posts: 6518
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 pm
Car: 2012 Juke SV
2011 Titan Pro-4X
2007 BMW 328i
Location: St. Charles, IL
Contact:

Post

QUICKFLOW240 wrote:The 2g's only ran 8 psi stock

The are both built to handle up to 18 psi stock

But with a 16g at 15psi you will hit the fuel cut. The simple solution to that is injectors and pump. With that setup boosting 20 psi and a little tuning in a gst you are looking at about 350 to the wheels. The gst only has a 15% drivtrain loss compared to the gsx's with somthing like a 30% drivtrain loss.

dsm's are hp mules but the car is heavy as hell so you would get alot more out af a 350hp sr than out of a 350hp 4g63.


You sure about that? I could SWEAR they run 14psi stock. I'm about to go have to find some proof.

l.i.240
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 5:42 pm

Post

EZcheese15 wrote:No, 78 is how far GA goes back on emissions testing. 76 is the last year for no cats. So in otherwords, a 1977 model MUST have a cat, but it is not tested under GA law :)


1975 an on for cat's....................and unleaded fuel

89sxRCR
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 12:08 pm
Car: destroying self esteem
Contact:

Post

Quote »Iono about those 350 in 240 swaps. A couple friends and I went and test drove one in Indiana and it was doggy as hell. Just from the feel I wouldn't have said anything better than a mid fifteen in the quarter. To this day I wonder what was wrong with that car . . . worst of all it's the only V8 240Z swap I've had the privledge of riding/driving.[/quote]

Something was wayyyy wrong with that car then... either it wasnt really swapped or somethings broke... stock 240z's can get into the low 15s already so a swapped should get VERY good times. My neighbors before he swapped it smoked gsr's, now its sooo unbielvably fast, peels out at 40mph. you gotta find another v8 swap to drive, just for the experience :))

FrEaK
Posts: 2315
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 7:55 am
Car: Boosted D21 Pickup

Post

http://www.magnusmotorsports.com/

They have an article on what they beilieve to be the cause of crankwalk and how it is unavoidable


Return to “240sx General Discussion”