Uhh No.AZ89two4Tsx wrote:I would do an LS swap because it'll most likely get better gas mileage than an SR/CA of the same performance.
Suck it 4 bangers.
Lolwut?AZ89two4Tsx wrote:I would do an LS swap because it'll most likely get better gas mileage than an SR/CA of the same performance.
dude, know what you're talking about before posting. the ls with a t56 gets great gas mileage. if you put a big turbo on a ca i doubt the little 1.8 liter will easily be able to propel the car while staying out of boost. i'm not saying the ls gets the best mileage but it does really well and you can easily get into 30+ for mpg. i've gotten 34ish on my mostly stock sr. you go around nutswinging the ca a lot which is fine, but it isnt the answer for everythingNali wrote:
Uhh No.
CA with a big turbo will only hit boost at +/- 4000RPM. You can drive around all day without ever touching boost and that CA will run like a 1.8 litre econocar....no way an LS is getting similar gas mileage.
Forgive me indeed i do not know much about LS into S chassis so yeah i might have been overzealous in my posting.White Comet wrote:dude, know what you're talking about before posting. the ls with a t56 gets great gas mileage. if you put a big turbo on a ca i doubt the little 1.8 liter will easily be able to propel the car while staying out of boost. i'm not saying the ls gets the best mileage but it does really well and you can easily get into 30+ for mpg. i've gotten 34ish on my mostly stock sr. you go around nutswinging the ca a lot which is fine, but it isnt the answer for everything
dang... 30-40 plus performance? why did nissan put a ka in the 240sx in the first place? the ka is 20mpg with no power... usdm ftl. I get more and more tempted to do a ca swap every day.Nali wrote:
Forgive me indeed i do not know much about LS into S chassis so yeah i might have been overzealous in my posting.
But the LS in their home cars, get some 25-30...atleast my friends cars pull that.My CA gets 30-40, so again forgive my overzealous posting.
Ive never even driven or had a friend with an LSx S chassis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLB2P1ziXYAMetal Angel wrote:
dang... 30-40 plus performance? why did nissan put a ka in the 240sx in the first place? the ka is 20mpg with no power... usdm ftl. I get more and more tempted to do a ca swap every day.
Nali,I asked this before in a different thread and I can even remember which one it was so I cant find your answer (if you answered) but what is a ca18dert? supercharged and turbocharged? cuz that would be the hotness!
Metal Angel wrote:Nali,I asked this before in a different thread and I can even remember which one it was so I cant find your answer (if you answered) but what is a ca18dert? supercharged and turbocharged? cuz that would be the hotness!
Yeah CA18DERT is a Turbo and Supercharged CA.Im still working out a lot of the kinks. Cuz alot of what im doing is all experimentation.Metal Angel wrote:hey nali do you have a thread devoted to your build? or just a thread with engine pics and numbers and stuff like that?
Yeah i get what you mean. Im just a CA fanboi so sometimes ull just have to take what i say with a grain of salt. My solution to any problem is do a CA swap....worst comes to worst the person parts it out, and the CA parts hoarders get more spares, so for me its win-win. Either ill get a new CA member on NICO to chat with or ill get a parted out CA18White Comet wrote:its fine to have strong faith in your setup, but being open minded is the name of the game. i'll have to check what my brother gets for gas mileage in his camaro, even though he doesnt have an ls its a carbed 350 mildly built with a t56. an ls1 would get even better mileage then my bro's setup, but on the highway you can cruise at just barely over idle and thats even with 4.55 rear end gearing
Mine sho don't, and it ruins well over 5 g's.AZ89two4Tsx wrote:I would do an LS swap because it'll most likely get better gas mileage than an SR/CA of the same performance.
Suck it 4 bangers.
You stand by your CA more than I have ever seen anyone stand by their KA-t, SR, RB, VQ, etc (yeah, Edwin knows a couple of things and one of the things Edwin knows is... guess I better get that out there b/c someone certainly will) Anyways, why stand by it so firmly? You stated why you want everyone else to give the CA a shot... but why are you so gung ho about it? How many horsies can you get safely and reliably before you need to get forged internals? Gas mileage is good as you previously stated... (mpg is a lame concern on a performance build but it sells the engine swap to the wife) Im just asking for a list of Pros basically.Nali wrote:Yeah i get what you mean. Im just a CA fanboi so sometimes ull just have to take what i say with a grain of salt. My solution to any problem is do a CA swap....worst comes to worst the person parts it out, and the CA parts hoarders get more spares, so for me its win-win. Either ill get a new CA member on NICO to chat with or ill get a parted out CA18