Post by
SpeedRacer1 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/speedracer1-u311.html
Wed Nov 27, 2002 9:04 am
K car your individual response style of answering questions is getting old especially when your arguments are easily countered. Niether of us is 100% correct, but neither of us is incorrect:
RCW 46.37.320Authority of state patrol regarding lighting devices or other safety equipment.(1) The chief of the state patrol is hereby authorized to adopt and enforce rules establishing standards and specifications governing the performance of lighting devices and their installation, adjustment, and aiming, when in use on motor vehicles, and other safety equipment, components, or assemblies of a type for which regulation is required in this chapter or in rules adopted by the state patrol. Such rules shall correlate with and, so far as practicable, conform to federal motor vehicle safety standards adopted pursuant to the national traffic and motor vehicle safety act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1381 et seq.) covering the same aspect of performance, or in the absence of such federal standards, to the then current standards and specifications of the society of automotive engineers applicable to such equipment: PROVIDED, That the sale, installation, and use of any headlamp meeting the standards of either the society of automotive engineers or the United Nations agreement concerning motor vehicle equipment and parts done at Geneva on March 20, 1958, or as amended and adopted by the Canadian standards association (CSA standard D106.2), as amended, shall be lawful in this state. (2) Every manufacturer who sells or offers for sale lighting devices or other safety equipment subject to requirements established by the state patrol shall, if the lighting device or safety equipment is not in conformance with applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards, provide for submission of such lighting device or safety equipment to any recognized organization or agency such as, but not limited to, the American national standards institute, the society of automotive engineers, or the American association of motor vehicle administrators, as the agent of the state patrol. Issuance of a certificate of compliance for any lighting device or item of safety equipment by that agent is deemed to comply with the standards set forth by the state patrol. Such certificate shall be issued by the agent of the state before sale of the product within the state.
(3) The state patrol may at any time request from the manufacturer a copy of the test data showing proof of compliance of any device with the requirements established by the state patrol and additional evidence that due care was exercised in maintaining compliance during production. If the manufacturer fails to provide such proof of compliance within sixty days of notice from the state patrol, the state patrol may prohibit the sale of the device in this state until acceptable proof of compliance is received by the state patrol.
(4) The state patrol or its agent may purchase any lighting device or other safety equipment, component, or assembly subject to this chapter or rules adopted by the state patrol under this chapter, for purposes of testing or retesting the equipment as to its compliance with applicable standards or specifications.
From NHTSAVehicles that meet one of the above requirements are assigned a vehicle eligibility number. All eligibility numbers are for a left-hand drive motor vehicles except where right-hand drive (RHD) is identified after the model. While there is no specific restriction on importing a right-hand drive vehicle, an eligibility number based on a substantially similar U.S.- certified motor vehicle may not apply. Our experience has shown that the safety performance of right-hand drive vehicles is not necessarily the same as that of apparently similar left-hand drive vehicles offered for sale in this country.
While neither explicitly say that RHD is illegal as im sure you will point out, that doesnt mean that you wont get cited by the RCW in my state.
Now it may not say explicitly in the books that right hand drive is illegal BUT it is illegal to modify your car in an unsafe manner(which isnt hard to find in the books).
<If it's easy to find, cite it. When you're done doing that, briefly outline the legal strategy that the state would use to prove that this modification in particular is unsafeIm sure the state can argue that>
The structural integrity of the car can be considered as going down anytime you remove the entire firewall. The state really doesnt even need to argue it because the judges have enough power to go "Nope your car isnt safe or up to the manufacturers standards" after about 1 minute.