I marked my tie-rod ends with a Testors paint pen, and counted the turns. Both sides were the same, I think 23 turns or something like that. My car was perfect when I had it checked. They didn't even charge me, since I get so much work done.elwesso wrote:1. Just a 17mm socket (I think).. You have to take the tenson rods out to replace the bushings with a press... A shop could od that with a lot of ease.
2. no
3. Just mark the tie rod end threads and try and eyeball it as much as you can, youll be fine to drive >20 miles
FOr clarification purposesRex wrote:Maybe it's just me, but there seems to be discussion of both Tie Rods and Tension Rods without much differentiation between the teo??
Just your thread title and first mention was of the Tension Rods, but most of the "advice" you were gettgin applies to the Tie Rods. Seemed easy to get lost in the responses.Jehangir wrote:So I was thinking about putting the car on those ramps then tourqing it. What do ya'all think. What do you mean Rex?
Wes - with rubber bushings, if you tighten it with the wheels hanging down then when you put the car on the ground it will twist the crap out of them and possibly tear them. Rubber bushings work by plastic deformation of the rubber material, and there is a limit to how much the inner and outer sleeves can turn relative to each other.elwesso wrote:The only thing you need to worry about torquing under load are the things that could change alignment under load..
SOP for anyone that reads the FSM or the posts on this board.RobertsnewQ wrote:
Wes - with rubber bushings, if you tighten it with the wheels hanging down then when you put the car on the ground it will twist the crap out of them and possibly tear them. Rubber bushings work by plastic deformation of the rubber material, and there is a limit to how much the inner and outer sleeves can turn relative to each other.
Always tighten them under load. Of course this doesn't apply to poly or heims.
Hope that makes sense.
ah ok that makes sense... Good information to know and it didnt apply to me since I was installing the ones with heim joints..RobertsnewQ wrote:Wes - with rubber bushings, if you tighten it with the wheels hanging down then when you put the car on the ground it will twist the crap out of them and possibly tear them. Rubber bushings work by plastic deformation of the rubber material, and there is a limit to how much the inner and outer sleeves can turn relative to each other.
Always tighten them under load. Of course this doesn't apply to poly or heims.
Hope that makes sense.
To be clear, R&R of the Tension Rods is "simple", but nonetheless physical?Jehangir wrote:Well guys...The job is done. It really wasn't that difficult. What made it a little frustrating was the fact that one of my tension rods was not the same as the other. Thus, the bushings wouldn't fit into it. No big deal, I just called Joe and they sent me a new tension rod the next day. I have it all together and the car drives fine.Now, the whole point of doing this was to fix a rattle in my front passenger side wheel well. This ofcourse is still there.
This sounds like someone replaced one of the rods with one from an "active" model.Jehangir wrote: What made it a little frustrating was the fact that one of my tension rods was not the same as the other. Thus, the bushings wouldn't fit into it.
Like Robert said end link (had that), or upper transverse link, or worn caliper bushings, the strut nut in the middle could be loose (had that on something else) or the strut cold be bad.Jehangir wrote: Now, the whole point of doing this was to fix a rattle in my front passenger side wheel well. This of course is still there.
His car is an active model...squeefoo wrote: This sounds like someone replaced one of the rods with one from an "active" model.
Yes.Jehangir wrote:Is the end link the thing that connects the sway bar to the transverse link?
I don't know who has what -just that the tension rod bushings are different sizes...elwesso wrote: His car is an active model...
Are you referring to the arrow? There has been quite a bit of discussion about this in the past. The OEM rods that I removed from "Q1" and "Q2" had the arrows pointing forward (not toward the rods) - as well as the replacement rods I bought - so I think it's a misprint in the service manual. Most things in the "Nissan" world are marked with an arrow pointing forward, so that's another part of the reason I think it's a misprint in the manual.Jehangir wrote:Oh, and Wes, I have read that the notch on the bushing should be in line with "bar" on the tension rod. But the tension rod that I took off my car had the notch a 180 degrees from what the FSM says. Also the Tension rod which I bought has the notch in the same position as the one I took off. I wonder if the 9093 tension rod bushings are positioned differently than the 9496.
And old Dodges, funny enough. That's a very good thing to look for.Gatis wrote:Just try to drive on bumpy paving and slowly apply the brakes... rattling sopped? The front passenger side brake caliper makes the sound. Rails are corroding and start to "play", but this is only comfort thing on slow driving. On hi-speed does not sound at all. And usually safe to drive.This is common for BMW and Nissan/ Infiniti after 10 yers of service.
Gatis