You really shouldn't knock Wes considering how much he contributes to the Q45 community.Johnny Rocket wrote:....if Wes would would walk the walk ....
I think Wes will not be offended....LOL...he knows me and has been a great help to me....you dont know what goes on &off the forum between him and I.... Believe me it was not knocking him...anlasak wrote:
You really shouldn't knock Wes considering how much he contributes to the Q45 community.
What exactly have you contributed lately?
Seriously. Show your cards.
Some of the Nissan 240sx guys might. You might try listing it in one of the "Parts" sub-categories.Johnny Rocket wrote:... I dont think anybody on this forum wants a 4.37 diff?
Bring him on!Paul Wall wrote:Trust me Greg has gotten peoples money back.
Hello! It's a joke!Raxephon wrote:
You really shouldn't knock Wes considering how much he contributes to the Q45 community.
I imagine the tunnel restrictions make a six speed completely out of the question?Q45tech wrote:Those that want the 4AT to shift at 40, 71, 109 would want a 4.375 still turns 158 mph at 6500 rpm......................only a 23% drop in MPG on highway to 18 MPG.
Ah yes, once again Captain Obvious arrives on the scene, just as late as usual.maxnix wrote:Hello! It's a joke!
Your Wrong........Very Wrong......LOL I will take on any of the above anytime..qship96 wrote:BIG DEAL!!!! Any totally stock newer garden variety pedestrian V6 Altima, Accord, or Camry will still walk away from you 0-30, 0-60, 0-100mph!!!
Old Q is the WRONG car if your main goal is acceleration ability.
Hey I will be willing to wager some money on the above statements?qship96 wrote:BIG DEAL!!!! Any totally stock newer garden variety pedestrian V6 Altima, Accord, or Camry will still walk away from you 0-30, 0-60, 0-100mph!!!
Old Q is the WRONG car if your main goal is acceleration ability.