I totally agree with DrifterProdigy on this one. There is no need to go to e85 unless you plan to raise the boost with the added octane, or increase timing for the same boost level. So in the case of the stock turbo, there is no increasing the boost. So you would want some way to increase timing. If you have a standalone/rom tune then it might be worth it, otherwise you will need to play with a static advance or know what you are doing with a piggyback to get it to add a little.DrifterProdigy85 wrote:Check out SupraForums. They have a ton of high horsepower setups running on e85. There seeing the same power levels as Q16 right now. Personally i wouldnt use e85 unless i went standalone cause you have to change the timing because of its excellent resistence to knock and AFR's can run lower than 11.0 and still make power. I plan on doing a Twin Turbo LS1 or LQ4 build in the next year and will be setting that up to run on e85.
E85 contains less energy per volume. So you need to increase the volume so it can support the same power. Rough rule of thumb is +30-40%.StricNyne wrote:i find this pretty cool, i know there is no e85 in nj thoughs so i dont know too much about it, why do u use such large injectors for stock turbo out of curosity
Just to clarify this.. this is actually not exactly correct.kcsturbocustoms wrote:Stoichiometric on e85 should be 9.7:1. However, on Florida's e85 (which is no less than 70% ethanol but varies from state to state), I have found that AFR's on e85 runs well between 11.5 and 12.1 as shown on the LC-1. Anything less was too rich, anything more and you may experience detonation - so this seems to be a happy medium.
Sil240 wrote:Kcustoms -
I'm in Ft lauderdaleHit me up
[email protected]
@ work right now, later I'll check out your vids.
Excellent information and clarification on Lambda and stoich readings for petrol/e85 for those not in the know. I will be going to full standalone soon to get everything I can from it.WhatsADSM wrote:
I'll send you a message tomorrow morning... sorry for the late response.
Just to clarify this.. this is actually not exactly correct.
Stoich is 9.7:1 on E85... However the AFRs under full load should be in the 7.5:1-8.3:1 range. When you are quoting 11.5 and 12.1 that is the equivalence ratio for GAS and not E85.
Here is where it gets a little confusing. A wideband actually always reads in lambda.... which is an easy way to measure how much above/below stoich you are. To convert lambda to an AFR it needs to know what gas you are running and then apply a scalar multiplier to the lambda reading. However the wideband actually doesn't know what gas you are running. When they create the widebands they use the scalar for regular gas since that is what most people use. So when you switched to e85, if you wanted the TRUE AFR numbers to be displayed you would have to configure the wideband to read for e85 which would change the scalars.
So what does it all mean? The simplest method to tune when you switch to e85, if you don't mind that the AFR numbers being displayed aren't exactly true, is to simply continue to use what you know... when on e85 and a standard gas configured wideband, tune for 14.7:1 (which is really 9.7:1 in the engine) under cruising, and 11.5:1 to 12.5:1 under WOT (which is really 7.5:1 to 8.3:1 in the engine) . (e85 can be run a bit leaner than regular gas at WOT BTW).
If you want to be a purist and read the TRUE afr readings, then see if your wideband can be configured to show the AFRs for e85 and tune for 9.7:1 crusing and about 8:1 WOT. Or finally, configure the wideband to just read in lambda (almost all widebands can be configured to do this) and run 1.0 at cruise and 0.8 at WOT.
i shoot for around 30%WhatsADSM wrote:
E85 contains less energy per volume. So you need to increase the volume so it can support the same power. Rough rule of thumb is +30-40%.
Modified by WhatsADSM at 8:57 AM 8/13/2009
One that is large enough to swallow small pets.kcsturbocustoms wrote:SWEET That just goes to show you can really make some good power on e85. Out of curiosity what type of turbo are you runnng?
Evan240z4u wrote:Andy, what size fuel lines are you using?
Evan
-So when you say increase volume by 30-40% your talking about the fuel pressure right??Booztd 3 wrote:
i shoot for around 30%
I didnt change a thing in my setup when I went to E85. (fuel pumps, injectors, etc)
My injector duties were at 60% at full power, and at full power on E85 my duties are 90%
The number following the "e" should be the percentage, as in some places you can find e98 which is a 98% ethanol blend. seems to me if the gas really is a 70% mix it should be relabeled.kcsturbocustoms wrote:Stoichiometric on e85 should be 9.7:1. However, on Florida's e85 (which is no less than 70% ethanol but varies from state to state)
What i meant is fuel system capacity should be able to provide 30% more fuel than what it has now. I like to keep my base fuel pressure right around 40psi. I dont like bumping it up any higher than that, especially when the regulator is already bumping it up 1psi for every 1psi of boost.meet07 wrote:
-So when you say increase volume by 30-40% your talking about the fuel pressure right??
-And if that is true should you get bigger injectors than need to race fuel? Like instead of running 600cc injectors for say 500 whp you will neeed something along the lines of 800cc??
this post is turning out good. There is only a hand full of high high whp rb25's