I got an RB20DET AWD From a GTS-4
For me the RB26 was way too expensive in a swap that is questionable to begin with.
The RB20 has thick Cylinder walls so that's why I went with it. Plus I just converted from 4g63's so 2.0 liters is comfortable with me.
If it breaks, I'll just build forged internals, slap a GT4088R on it and call it a day.
Either way it all boils down to that sexy, sexy Japanese Inline-6 sound.
Bluefire wrote:Personally I think the RB20 is a complete waste of money... I've heard all the excuses... RB20's are dirt cheap, they rev higher, yadda yadda yadda.
These are *All* The excuses?
Quote »The bottom line is if you really want an RB get a 25 or 26. If your gonna put a heavy a** iron block inline six in a 240, it better have the displacement to move it and the transmission to hold the power.[/quote]Guess what else is heavy, Iron and came with your 240? The Lame KA!
Quote »Seriously with an RB20 all your doing is adding more weight, decreasing displacement, sticking with the same crap transmission, and ultimately spending more money to custom make everything, JUST so you can say you have an RB...[/quote]None of this is true. You lose Displacement, ok. Adding weight? Its a marginal gain. Nothing that can't be offset with proper suspension damping.
But the KA with all its "displacement" doesn't even come close to a stock RB20. The RB20 also bolts in, meaning there is custom nothing.
A lot of people buy mount kits, but with an r32 x-member it is truly bolt-in.
I know you are entitled to your opinion, especially in this thread. But there were a lot of things you overlooked in your statement. By addressing those maybe we can cut back on the millions of threads like this all over NICO.
RB20DET= Fun
RB25DET= More fun
RB26DETT= Fun only if you fix the oiling quirks= More money= The most fun!