I have test pipes and I don't see how it took away from torque. All I felt was more power.Jacko3 wrote:Brandaid:
Wait until you add a testpipe to a G, and with many more mods, and stay up on the high revs and you will be surprised how agile and fast the G really is.
Two days ago, by accident, i went at it with a modified Mustang, and beleive me, I wasn't even at my max yet. I knew if I stepped on it a little, I might make him look bad. So, I slowed down. Though, i wil say that the testpipes do take away torque on take-off. But when the G is moving, its another story altogether.
+1 everything he saidTeflonG35 wrote:Racing from those speeds don't really mean much. Too many variables. Have to be from a stop. I'm not condoning street racing. I'm just saying. Evos are nothing to joke about. They are quick bastards. I doubt it was supercharged though. A turbo is more affective on 4 bangers. Specially when they come from the factory with a turbo.
Stock for stock a 07 G sedan can beat a EVO or STI, trouble is finding a stock EVO or STIJacko3 wrote:Joe:
That STi is fast like heck. I think the STI and the EVO enjoy a disproportionate power to weight ratio. If they where the size and weight of a G, they would be eaten like Lemon Cake by the G.
Sorry dude, Motortrend just called you a liar!Sentientbydesign wrote:EVOs come from the factory turboed.
I don't care how much NA mods you make to your G, it won't take on an EVO.
Serious weight reduction would be the only answer.
I don't think it is that simple. There is more to it. .7 seconds faster but less torque and hp. It must be somewhere else too not just the weight. Probably drivetrain, suspention, awd system maybe different, maybe the tires. Maybe all.gwoods wrote:
Amazing what 350lbs can do?]