Questions on "CHANGE"....

A place for intelligent and well-thought-out discussion involving politics and associated topics. No nonsense will be tolerated at all.
User avatar
JustinStrife
Posts: 5120
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 10:13 pm
Car: '99 FRC. 402, Vortech T-Trim @ 12psi = 706rwhp/621rwtq
Contact:

Post

sanioll wrote:
Very biased post. As a human being, and as a computer scientist who studied human brain and its basic structural behaviors, I see a pattern on this car forum. Almost all of the administrators and moderators are conservative republicans.

The question is why?
The majority of people on the corvetteforum that I belong to are conservative republicans. Easily 80-85%. I wonder why that is?


User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

HashiriyaS14 wrote:
To attribute the Clinton-era economic expansion to the dot-com boom is wildly inaccurate.

There was broad-based growth across nearly all segments throughout the nation, a decrease in the annual federal deficit, across the board wage increases, et cetera.

The dot-com boom and subsequent crash really didn't have a whole lot to do with anything the Clinton administration did. It was also not a significant enough phenomenon on it's own to have created such a broad-based economic revival as was experienced.

Bob Rubin was and is a very smart guy. That's why the "Clinton Boom" happened.
There's some truth to that. Technology IS why the Clinton area saw economic growth, but it wasn't just the internet. All forms of data storage, communications, and automation conspired to increased productivity.

Much of this technological revolution started in the late 70s and especially the 80s.


Return to “Politics Etc.”