Curses... *covers face* if i cant see him, he cant see me...Heath wrote:Ignoring my question won't make me go away!!!
The ratings that are put on Superchargers and turbos, in terms of HP maximum, are NEVER accurate. It all depends on the engine. In this case it "only" takes 4~6psi to make 350~400HP. Now compare that to an SR that requires 15~20psi to make that same powerMJC wrote:In which case the 350-375whp limited M90 (even the M90s [ported] probably wont crack 400, although I could be wrong) wouldn't be enough for what I'm looking for...I'd probably go with a centri blower like a Procharger.
Trust me my friend, I understand that paper numbers don't always agree with dynos, but you are incorrect in saying it all depends on the engine. I am BY NO MEANS a supercharger expert, but I do deal with many turbos, on many engines.PoorManQ45 wrote:The ratings that are put on Superchargers and turbos, in terms of HP maximum, are NEVER accurate. It all depends on the engine. In this case it "only" takes 4~6psi to make 350~400HP. Now compare that to an SR that requires 15~20psi to make that same power
It's a fat pig with an undersized engine350zQ45a wrote:It's a high revving DOHC engine, that has to move 4,200+ pounds off the line, with unoptimized gears.
Ryan: Turbo chargers have there place too. The VH's powerband is actually PERFECT for a larger turbo charger sinse it requires them a little bit to spool up. It'd be awesome to have a turbo matched up to kick in around the same time as the VVT.350zQ45a wrote:No i recommended the eaton because it matches up with the powerband
the Q has an incredibly high powerband, and an eaton suits it perfect. The Q doesn't need help up high, it needs help down low
Thanks man. I may do that.350zQ45a wrote:MJC: You should hitup 450ZXTT (I think that's his nick)
His name is Slim. He has a 300ZX with a VH45DE with some turbos slapped on it. The car is completely bada$$. He could probably give you alot of good info. He's the only one I know of that's slapped some hairdryers on the VH. He's also running JWT ECU I believe.
If you ever got a chance to drive a Q with 350-400rwhp, you'd see why further pursuits are worthless.MJC wrote:The same thing holds true...it seems to be limited at 350-400whp. Again, maybe I just didn't find the right cars...
My comments aren't to bash, they are to bring up OPTIONS. I don't mean any harm.
Check out this SR20, 520whp at 20psi... it made 410whp at 15psi.PoorManQ45 wrote: In this case it "only" takes 4~6psi to make 350~400HP. Now compare that to an SR that requires 15~20psi to make that same power
Really? I know guys with 400hp 2500lbs fwd daily drivers....without significant suspension mods other than springs and shocks. But they are turbo so it's easy to stay out of boost.AZhitman wrote:
If you ever got a chance to drive a Q with 350-400rwhp, you'd see why further pursuits are worthless.
The Q is virtually undriveable (yes, undriveable) at those levels without significant suspension modifications (410 rwhp @ roughly 7 psi).
The problem you face with the Q's engine is that you can't cram more air into the cylinders and expect the engine to hold. You are creating too much cylinder pressure which is what cracks the ring lands, not detonation. So efficiency in this case, is a side issue.MJC wrote:The reason I brought up my earlier point of the larger M112 is not only for more power capability, but it will make the same horsepower at a lower boost and lower intake charge...thus safer for the engine. A larger compressor will flow the same amount of air at a colder intake charge, thus more dense, thus more horsepower.
This is the reason that if you put a GT28RS on an SR20, it's not going to make nearly as much power as the same engine with a GT35R at the same boost.
The VH45DE engine is mechanically efficient in all regards to the GM 3.8L engine. It's DOHC w/ VVT valvetrain is more efficient in the upper RPMs where peak power counts. Although engine VE tends to be limited in it's ability to produce power due to the compressor limiting absolute flow.MJC wrote:While you may say that the M90 is more than capable of 6psi (which I agree, it is), it does have limitations that will approach very quickly if trying to pass 350whp on your way to 400whp. The GM 3800 guys have been running these things non intercooled up to 11psi (so I am told) and go higher than that with one obviously. My only concern is that I have never heard of one making more than 370ish whp without nitrous. (again, it's very possible that they have, I just don't personally know of one).
11psi on a 3.8 liter would 'roughly' correspond to 9.3psi on our 4.5 liter, which is more than I'd want to run on 10.2 compression w/ 93 octane anyways, but they run this on an 8.5:1 compression motor that with an efficent compressor will gladly stand up to 17-18psi on 93 octane on a daily basis with a safe tune.
You answered your own question - the Q was s/c, so it IMMEDIATELY stepped out of line, even feathering the throtte (granted, it had 1st gear start).Black95Q wrote:Really? I know guys with 400hp 2500lbs fwd daily drivers....without significant suspension mods other than springs and shocks. But they are turbo so it's easy to stay out of boost.
As far as the Q, I mean if you WOT off the line then it'll be burnout city...but why not just modulate the throttle until traction is obtained??
I understand what you're saying, and I don't know if you were partially referring to me, but I've driven cars with plenty more horsepower than that...1000ish, not that I'm a pro with that type of power yet, but I'm no stranger to 120-150mph trapping cars.AZhitman wrote:You answered your own question - the Q was s/c, so it IMMEDIATELY stepped out of line, even feathering the throtte (granted, it had 1st gear start).
Also, Wes is right, the car was a POS on OEM dry-rotted tires and tired suspension.
People who start throwing around numbers upwards of 375hp have usually never driven a car putting that kind of power to the ground, and must realize that at some point, the law of diminishing returns takes over.
410 rwhp was simply too much to make the car "liveable", however, I believe it would have been perfect for a car that has been well-maintained and with proper tires. Remember, that is nearly DOUBLE the stock rwhp.
Like I said... it increases flow.MJC wrote:As for the 28RS vs the 35R, it's not necessarily about flowing more, it's about doing it more efficently. 20psi is 20psi in the engine, as you know it just means 20psi of back pressure. The 35R is making more power due to the temperature and density of the charge. If you break it down to symantics then yes it's 'flowing more air' but that, again, is due to the efficency of the larger compressor.