Best bet is to make a recording of your friend's Mustang with the blown resonators and then burn it to a CD for your player.unknown007 wrote: im just trying to get a deep tone roar.
i want a VH45DE deep tone sorry no ford hahahamaxnix wrote:Best bet is to make a recording of your friend's Mustang with the blown resonators and then burn it to a CD for your player.
Much cheaper, no performance loss, no bad emission gain.
Vroom! Vroooom!
I take offense at that. My car has high flow cats, no precats, a magnaflow muffler, and sounds FAR better than any Mustang ever dreamed of sounding. The VH's sound is in a whole different category. Granted, V8 Mustangs do sound great...they're just intolerably crude cars.maxnix wrote:Best bet is to make a recording of your friend's Mustang with the blown resonators and then burn it to a CD for your player.
A V4 huh?unknown007 wrote:.Sorry dunno who your raced i beat alot of v6 v4 and some v8.
Yeah sure whatever you say.I never said they didn't keep up for a minute.New cars whoopie doesn't mean old cars aren't faster.Just because your car slow doesnt mean everybody's is.So dont hate because yours gives up on v6'sqship96 wrote:You might want to pick up a copy of one of the recent car magazines that have the summry of all the new cars they test.......you will see the 0-60 and quarter mile times of the v6 equipped models of the Accord/camry/altima/g35.etc will be better than any stock{and most modified} 1990-1996 q45.......dont fool yourself,if you beat one of these, it was because they were not racing you.....or felt sorry for you and didnt want to hurt your ego!
yea you know the ones in fast and the furiousRazi wrote:A V4 huh?
Yup v4,v6,v8 eh some.Dont under estimate this car.Im not talking about drag racing or track ethier.So maybe its the driver.Razi wrote:A V4 huh?
Aren't the focus V4?MinisterofDOOM wrote:Ford actually made a V4 some years back.
Oh yeah hahaha i forgot them types of engines.Well i'll be honest the V6 camry are fast but honestly when will i race one?All i see here are stolen intergra's or intergra's with stolen engines.Ethier way im doing all this for myself so if u can help thanks if you just wanna talk crap like you know go ahead.MinisterofDOOM wrote:I4, not V4.
Ford of England had one in the 60s. The original Mustang prototype was a mid engine V4. Too expensive, so they based it on the Falcon floorpan.Razi wrote:A V4 huh?
Guess that means you are either too lazy, dumb, or just to ignorant to pick up a magazine and read a few test results???? My guess{from TRYING to read your poorly composed posts here} is that your car is in much worse operating condition than as it was when it left the factory, and even the current crop of 4 cylinder Altimas, Camrys, Accords would leave you behind......if your engine even started.unknown007 wrote:
Yeah sure whatever you say.I never said they didn't keep up for a minute.New cars whoopie doesn't mean old cars aren't faster.Just because your car slow doesnt mean everybody's is.So dont hate because yours gives up on v6's
Except to pasta and 007......when you have trouble reading old posts and actually comprehending the information, much less retaining it.....every day is like their first on this board! God I hate stupid people!!!!maxnix wrote:The G50 loses a lot of 0-60 mph acceleration runs, but wins a lot of 50-150 mph ones.
This is old news to anyone who has been here over 3 weeks.
Which is why I only work in the commercial arena. Not to say there aren't a few Dodos around, but at least I can tell them to take a hike. Can't do that in residential as there are anti-discrimination laws which protect the terminally dumb.qship96 wrote: God I hate stupid people!!!!
Ignorant no lazy maybe.Reading specs are nothing compared to cars on the road.If you really wanna look like a ***** then i'll prove you wrong.I'll make a video of myc ar running and beinging diganosed.I got code 55 OK and no codes from on transmission.Exterior is in not so good condition and thats how i bought it.My car has 120,129 miles.So keep talking about how bad your car is aint my fault four cylinder smoke you all day.qship96 wrote:
Guess that means you are either too lazy, dumb, or just to ignorant to pick up a magazine and read a few test results???? My guess{from TRYING to read your poorly composed posts here} is that your car is in much worse operating condition than as it was when it left the factory, and even the current crop of 4 cylinder Altimas, Camrys, Accords would leave you behind......if your engine even started.
Ecstasy is better!!! hahaha........this has gone way off topic.From pre-cats to magazines to some guy with no basground of even owning a Q45 to drugsmaxnix wrote:Anyone think it is worthwhile to do heroin? .
You are proving my point about either not understanding what you read or retaining the information, as if you scroll back to my FIRST post in this thread ace, the answer will magically appear......whether you can wrap your little mind around it or not is questionable at best....so far you have obviously failed to get the message.....Do you suffer from ADHD or just overall general stupidity????unknown007 wrote:Let's start over.Anybody here think it's worth removing pre-cats?
I'm not looking for performance to smoke qship96's 96 Q45.
Magazines huh everything you see in maagzines aint true.Thats a fact.
Yeah bro i suffer from add,adhd.stupidity you name it. I'm asking this to someone who's done it not a someone who just reads magazines.Thanks for your time though.qship96 wrote:
You are proving my point about either not understanding what you read or retaining the information, as if you scroll back to my FIRST post in this thread ace, the answer will magically appear......whether you can wrap your little mind around it or not is questionable at best....so far you have obviously failed to get the message.....Do you suffer from ADHD or just overall general stupidity????