Word, just let me know brother.NolimitZ32 wrote:Ace, thats actually funny cause I'll be in OC in Oct for a wedding, if I got the money by then, who knows maybe I'll be driving home in a 2+2
TOTALLY agree, speed almost always sacrifices quality.jona300zx wrote:cool man no rush make them nice and neat...... rushed work usually has flaws.
What do you mean, cross-sectional area?raremotive wrote:What area of TB are you planning to use?
Just curious in your reasoning for 45 mm TBs?NolimitZ32 wrote:I'm looking in the 45mm Diam. range, so 1590 sq mm give or take. I'm trying to maximize the area but because of where I want to place the ITBs relative to the lower plenum I'm limited on space by the walls between the runners.
45mm gives me a cross-sectional area that is closest to that of the runners at the mating surface to the lower plenum. It actually comes out to need like 44.76mm TBs but I figure It'll be easier to go with a round number, slightly larger than required so as not to create a bottleneck and then work off of it in the future (if this goes anywhere) to creak different setups for low end vs. top end, the possibilities are endless as to how you can make the car behave just by changing the size of the TBs so I figured I'd start with the most neutral, that being factory matched openings.raremotive wrote:Just curious in your reasoning for 45 mm TBs?NolimitZ32 wrote:I'm looking in the 45mm Diam. range, so 1590 sq mm give or take. I'm trying to maximize the area but because of where I want to place the ITBs relative to the lower plenum I'm limited on space by the walls between the runners.
The system I'm building right now is going to replace the upper plenum and some other things under the hood but will still use the stock MAF and air piping to meter air. I want to make a system that is completely bolt on first and then back off and make the Atmospheric system as it will require little work to convert from the full system I am building ATM but will require extensive EM modifications to the car.fyneyoungstunna wrote:it should simplify a lot of stuff under the hood!! thats enough of a reason for me lol.
45 mm should be good for 260+ hp. I do suspect a sluggish low end. Even the RB26 has 45 mm tbs. Peak power is 6800 rpm. The RB also has a poor low end, but much made up by the rpms (9k of it..)...and turbos.NolimitZ32 wrote: 45mm gives me a cross-sectional area that is closest to that of the runners at the mating surface to the lower plenum. It actually comes out to need like 44.76mm TBs but I figure It'll be easier to go with a round number, slightly larger than required so as not to create a bottleneck and then work off of it in the future (if this goes anywhere) to creak different setups for low end vs. top end, the possibilities are endless as to how you can make the car behave just by changing the size of the TBs so I figured I'd start with the most neutral, that being factory matched openings.

I'd say if you are not happy or enjoy your job. Then go for ME degree. Automotive industry is very packed. Even I would not land working for Ford or even.. Nissan.NolimitZ32 wrote:Bad a** man, I just graduated with Construction Management and thinking of going back for ME as well, I've done a ton of self study, I think its the best way to learn anything. Well thanks for all your input man I really appreciate it and am always open to suggestions and corrections.
And that last pic is sort of what I had in mind.