That's where you smack that b*tch buck in the face, and tell it to die. If you're a REAL man, it will do as you say and quietly sit down and bleed to death. That's what it did when I killed my first deer w/ a knife.Daunttless wrote:It has to be a buck though, and it has to be angry after you stab it, you also need to catch it on video. : )
Team503 wrote: The other idea behind the sticker is visibility - the more an average person sees that gay people are everywhere, from every walk of life, the more likely that person is to display tolerance. Make sense?
You know, Manute Bol killed a Lion with his bare hands in Africa. It was some a of coming of age, manhood, initiation kinda' thing. Good to see you're alive Danunt. It's also good to see some like-minded people on this board. I agree 100% that there is a double standard in the US, enforced mainly by the liberals in Congress. Don't you dare say that you're proud to be white. I don't like hunters, but that is my choice. And unlike a liberal lobyist, I'm not pushing for a law to make my view the only leagal way of thinking. I don't like the limitation of firearms that we, law abiding citizens, can carry. There are limitations on clip/round size and fully automatic is completly illeagal. What if we, at some point in the future, have to overthrow an unlawful, and unjust government. With the way gun laws are going we'll have to fight using bolt-action, single-shot .22 caliber hunting rifles. I say we should be allowed to have any of the standard issue millitary weaponry. Like it or not, that's the intention of the Constitution. That is the ultimate check and balance. <---Talk about a thread hijack.Daunttless wrote:I still vote for the knife approach, if you can kill a deer with a knife you've got my respect. : )
Atom12 wrote:I say we should be allowed to have any of the standard issue millitary weaponry. Like it or not, that's the intention of the Constitution. That is the ultimate check and balance. <---Talk about a thread hijack.
I'd just want an M4 Carbine...the standard Army Ranger issued weapon. Laser sight, and an attachable grenade launcher...I forget the name of it but I'll look. :ylsuper Ahhhh it's the M203 grenade launcher.repo man wrote:Ooooo, oooooo, I want an M249 SAW, Mk 19, and an M24 Sniper Weapons System. Oh, and throw in a year's supply of MRE's. Love that cheese tortellini!
Daunttless wrote:I'm all about the M4 with a SOCOM. : ) By God if I want a 200 round drum magazine on my M4, I better be able to buy it. Screw the SAW, its basically an M16, if it fired something bigger than a five-five-sixer I'd consider it. Barrett MA2 all the way. When you have to lay a tarp down in front of your gun so you can shoot the driver of the tank, while he's still sitting in the drivers seat behind 18 inches of armor plating, 1.5 clicks away - thats a real gun.
Movingviolation240 wrote:hell.... if I was gay and anything but white I'd have a 100,000 a year job right now and nobody could fire me.....
It just sucks to be a straight white guy born into an upper middle class family..... because I can't blame the fact that my life sucks on anybody but me.
I'm not Canadian chumly.... If you took the time to read my NAME, or perhaps look at my profile, you would have found out that I am in fact a Mainer. The Avatar is a joke that I won't bother explaning. And.... it is the exact same principle, I wouldn't say, "Hi I'm Greg the American" either. If someone asks, sure I'd tell them I'm a white, male, American, and I'm hung like a bull moose!! But NONE of those are identifying characteristics that I would put a sticker on my car to proudly display!!!! One's sexuality should not be an issue that they feel obligated to force upon people who really don't care!!! That, in my humble opinion, makes you a PERVERT!! Sexuality is great, but if you center your life around it... and spew it forth like a giant beacon, you're freakin lame!!! Geez, this is really getting annoyin!GreekM3 wrote:hmmmmm. Maybe you should take down your canadian flag if your so against people identifying themselves.
maineimport wrote:I'm not Canadian chumly.... If you took the time to read my NAME, or perhaps look at my profile, you would have found out that I am in fact a Mainer. The Avatar is a joke that I won't bother explaning. And.... it is the exact same principle, I wouldn't say, "Hi I'm Greg the American" either. If someone asks, sure I'd tell them I'm a white, male, American, and I'm hung like a bull moose!! But NONE of those are identifying characteristics that I would put a sticker on my car to proudly display!!!! One's sexuality should not be an issue that they feel obligated to force upon people who really don't care!!! That, in my humble opinion, makes you a PERVERT!! Sexuality is great, but if you center your life around it... and spew it forth like a giant beacon, you're freakin lame!!! Geez, this is really getting annoyin!
GreekM3 wrote:Sorry about the canadian comment. My point was that people like to identify themselves. Are you saying the thousands of immigrant Americans that hang their native flag from their cars are wrong? People with political bumper stickers saying which party and canidate they represent is wrong? Whose to say whats right or wrong. I don't think you and I are.
And I do believe life is based around sex and sexuality. Its the #1 WANT and NEED of every women and man.
maineimport wrote: I'd rather explain to my son, what the Honduran flag on the Toyota 4X4 in front of us means, than explain the pink triangle on the powder blue civic next to us.
GreekM3 wrote:I didn't have to explain that I would have to explain why 2 men are holding hands or kissing in public. I don't want to explain why that is happening, but at the same time the world is changing and weather you or I like it or not acceptance must be made.
Lost_To_A_K-Car wrote:Originally posted by Daunttless "]Because by the AMA it is sexual deviancy, there is no way to reproduce.
Um, no, that is not the AMA's position.
For the record, it is not the position of American Psychiatric Association or the American Psychological Association. either.
silviamirage wrote:maineimport-that is how you would expain it.
I would explain it as two people satisfying their sexual wants/need for companionship in the way that they choose, just as any heterosexual couple would.
Why can't people accept homosexuals as sexual beings that simply like something different than heterosexuals, rather than "sexual devients"?
Why do you believe that your way is the only "right" way?
