One Sick Woman

[NY94J30]

Yes, and while I am sure I know what your answer is, I wonder, if there truly are transcendental rights and wrongs, then how are we to know what they are? Are we to assume that every concievable situation is addressed in the holy texts, i.e. the holy texts say that thou shalt not turn cats into vases; or, alternatively, that there are many foundational principles - or, Commandments, if you like - and other allegories, that we are to apply and analogize to those situations that have not been explicity addressed. If the latter, then is it really transcendental if it is to be analogized by humans who clearly add subjectivity to the equation. And how then will we resolve the differences in interpretation that inevitably result of individual perspective. Ultimately we are left without anything transcendant, rather, we have subjective determinations and moral relativity.
Modified by NY94J30 at 2:19 AM 10/31/2004

[JustinStrife]

And if her or anyone wants to make art of my cat, I'll make art of their spleen.

werd. I've had one of my cats for almost 17 years, 3 states, and 6 homes. If anybody even LOOKS at any of my cats with a negative intent, it's on like donkey kong biatch. .45 style

They are my family. Hell they're closer then family(mainly because half my family has tried to cheat me in one way or another)

[StrangeLove]

ok, and now the animal rights people are gonna get all uppety.

in all reality, who the hell cares? its a dead animal.

if you were to be killed by an animal, do you think the animal would have remorse or regret about killing you?? i think not.

Apathy.... the american way!

Animals are supposed to know the difference between right and wrong? I thought they were just stupid useless souless creatures...