Oh, please!rn79870 wrote:We interrupt this broadcast to take you to Arizona where Sen. McCain has been taken to the hospital with back pain. blip...blip...blip...
Sen. McCain was admitted to St. DoOvers Presbyterian Hospital this morning with complications related to back pain. His aids reported that he has been on his knees since Friday begging his superiors to replace Palin as his running mate. He was seen mumbling "no, no, no, not her" as he was wheeled into the emergency room.
Film at 11.
We return you to the regularly scheduled program...
No, I definitely don't believe that. As I said, this video in and of itself is not a negative, nor is Sarah Palin's faith. In fact, positioned correctly, both could be political positives for the GOP.Soravia wrote:So Obamites truly believe that address to Christian kids in a church about the war should not mention God.
I'm no Baptist myself, and not really in line with their crazy stuff on the pulpit. But this is far far away from the racist hate spewed at Mr. Obama's 20 years long chruch.
It was half in jest and half truth.szhosain wrote:
Oh, please!
Z
Oh, I dunno about that one. If we want "change" in Washington, we have to have people who are willing to cross lines and people who haven't been affected by its politics. That's the McCain-Palin ticket. Obama has Biden who's been there for 30 years and that's going to be more of the same (not Bush, but politics). If we want to change the culture of politics, we have to be willing to vote in people new to Washington and people willing to cross lines. If we can change Washington, the rest of America changes with it.rn79870 wrote:The fence sitters now have their two feet dangling on the dem side due to this appointment.
YES!smockers83 wrote:If we want "change" in Washington, we have to have people who are willing to cross lines and people who haven't been affected by its politics.
YES!smockers83 wrote:That's the McCain-Palin ticket.
YES!smockers83 wrote:Obama has Biden who's been there for 30 years and that's going to be more of the same (not Bush, but politics).
YES!smockers83 wrote:If we want to change the culture of politics, we have to be willing to vote in people new to Washington and people willing to cross lines.
YES!smockers83 wrote:If we can change Washington, the rest of America changes with it.
"Half truth"? Hmmm ... I must have missed something ... can you point me to the part of your post that had any truth in it? Here is your complete post again:rn79870 wrote:It was half in jest and half truth.
Well, this publicly avowed fence sitter - see my posts on the topic recently and in the past: *Yours Truly* (Take a bow, Z!) is firmly planted, both feet, on the Republican side due to "this appointment".rn79870 wrote:The fence sitters now have their two feet dangling on the dem side due to this appointment.
That's all well and good, and generally I agree with you. My gripe isn't one of aspirations, it's one of execution.smockers83 wrote:If we want to change the culture of politics, we have to be willing to vote in people new to Washington and people willing to cross lines.
Well, unfortunately, it is an issue, and while Reverend Wright certainly is a problem for Obama, these are different sorts of problems.dusred wrote:Dems: Let's not bring her Religion up as an issue here in this campaign. If you want to bring it up we can surely bring up Obama and his twisted pastor into the picture.
When will you know if she does? If she's asked if she truly believes such things, will she turn a 180 and say that she can no longer ally herself with such beliefs? Would that be an admirable thing?HashiriyaS14 wrote:Granted Palin hasn't said that EITHER, I'm not saying that she has, I'm just cautioning that if she DOES, it'll be trouble for the GOP.
HashiriyaS14 wrote:Well, unfortunately, it is an issue, and while Reverend Wright certainly is a problem for Obama, these are different sorts of problems.
Yes, Wright is a wacko. I'm of the opinion that Obama allied himself with Wright to buy credibility in the sphere of black Chicago politics. Even if you disagree, you must admit that Obama has not been speaking as if he plans to govern largely on the basis of his faith.
Well, the VP doesn't do much governing to begin with. Also, Palin, from what I've heard has cleaned up (or however you want to say it) politics in Alaska. I know some will be like oh, its a rural area, its nothing like the city. But politics is politics no matter where or who you are, its the truth. I've seen it, I've lived it even in my short time on this planet. That aspect alone shows she's willing to put herself out there and clean it up in Washington.HashiriyaS14 wrote:That's all well and good, and generally I agree with you. My gripe isn't one of aspirations, it's one of execution.
The party lines of this country are drawn almost precisely along social issues. Ultimately, in THIS country, social issues are what determines who votes for whom (unfortunately).
Honestly, this is what politicians do. McCain has done the same thing with Rod Parsley, who, until he said some very shocking things, had been McCain's "spiritual guide". He had never really been a very outwardly religious man before, he just picked up Parsley to buy himself credibility with the far right just like Obama picked up Wright to buy himself credibility with certain Chicago factions who didn't think he was "black enough".Soravia wrote: He, I believe, would take advantage of ANYTHING to get himself above the situation.
Being religious and injecting one's religion into policy when it's inappropriate aren't the same thing.96Qowner wrote: When will you know if she does? If she's asked if she truly believes such things, will she turn a 180 and say that she can no longer ally herself with such beliefs? Would that be an admirable thing?
Is it good for the Democratic Party that Obama disavowed his 20 years exclusive association with Rev Wright's Black Liberation Theology Church?
What I'm finding terribly intriguing about this Palin nomination is that Democrats keep getting themselves deep into hypocrisy in their knee-jerk "questions" and criticisms of Palin. She has no experience? She's religious? She's a mother of 5 who has the gall to think she can do a job as well as a man????? She "allowed" her teen daughter to get pregnant????
Very good point! That is exactly why I think someone with even the few years of experience that Palin has, will do well. She will challenge the status quo and "business as usual mentality" that Biden has. And keep McCain on his toes too when he becomes the POTUS.smockers83 wrote:They'll go in there and say, well this doesn't make sense and everyone else who's been there for 20 years will say sure it does, because they've been apart of it for 20 years and they now believe it makes sense only because they think it does because that's been the way its been for so long.
rn79870 wrote:We interrupt this broadcast to take you to Arizona where Sen. McCain has been taken to the hospital with back pain. blip...blip...blip...
Sen. McCain was admitted to St. DoOvers Presbyterian Hospital this morning with complications related to back pain. His aids reported that he has been on his knees since Friday begging his superiors to replace Palin as his running mate. He was seen mumbling "no, no, no, not her" as he was wheeled into the emergency room.
Film at 11.
We return you to the regularly scheduled program...
From your post I get the impression that you don't understand the meaning of the word prejudice? Here, this may help...http://www.merriam-webster.com/wingFeather wrote:Is there something wrong with God talk? I like Palin even more now. This sure beats Obama's racist extremist church situation!
RN, your perfect know it all mask is starting to crack with prejudiced banter like this:
rn79870 wrote:
From your post I get the impression that you don't understand the meaning of the word prejudice? Here, this may help...http://www.merriam-webster.com/