Ummm ... wingfeather, let's not go there. Please avoid the personals against people who are posting here. No matter what you feel might be the reason. It ain't needed.wingFeather wrote:Son, you can't ban everyone who disagrees with your opinions. But you can throw chemicals in their eyes! You know you want to.
Another swing and a miss.wingFeather wrote:You might want to look up the word yourself. You have an irrational age bias. Shame on you for owning yourself!
szhosain wrote:
Ummm ... wingfeather, let's not go there. Please avoid the personals against people who are posting here. No matter what you feel might be the reason. It ain't needed.
Z
rn79870 wrote:
Another swing and a miss.
I'll help you wing, apparently you were looking at the wrong word...Step 1, define Prejudice.... 1: injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregard of one's rights; especially : detriment to one's legal rights or claims
Step 2, apply definition to your original post. But that can't be done because A, you misused the word, and B, you didn't understand the concept.
That's about 9 strikes, aren't you out yet?
Looks like he's gotcha Bobby:wingFeather wrote:Look up the definition again. You missed the other entry.
I'd paste it for you but I'm on an iPhone.
Thanks, but, I am not eligible!smockers83 wrote:Hey Z, wanna run for President with me on an independent ticket?
Not in a bikini!themadscientist wrote:You look hot holding a gun?
Hostility? Sorry, not hostile. Adverse opinion. Nope, not adverse. (see the post)Preconceived judgment. That doesn't apply. (not preconceived)AZhitman wrote:c: an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics
*braces for TMS to turn this into an innuendo about Palin*rn79870 wrote:You guys will never fit a square peg in a round hole.
I never intended any such thing, Hash - just expanding, trying to draw contrast between Palin and Obama and those who support him. My posts seldom respond entirely to one poster - that's for IM. While something you say might prompt a reply, I'm posting for anyone who might read the thread.HashiriyaS14 wrote:And don't lump me in with the d!ck that are dragging her daughter into this. I didn't say a damned thing about that and you are an instigator for suggesting otherwise.
Fair enough.96Qowner wrote:I never intended any such thing, Hash - just expanding, trying to draw contrast between Palin and Obama and those who support him. My posts seldom respond entirely to one poster - that's for IM. While something you say might prompt a reply, I'm posting for anyone who might read the thread.
My apologies, if I raised your hackles.
haha I like your sig. She is very pretty.themadscientist wrote:You look hot holding a gun?