gwoods wrote:why not do a single turbo?
The supercharger uses horsepower to make horsepower, the turbo uses wasted exhaust gas.
OK, that is waaaaay to elementary of a perspective to make a proper decision. If the turbo's higher efficiency was the only factor to consider, nobody would run superchargers. I know there really aren't many all-in-one kits for the Infinitis yet, but there are for my BMW, both s/c and t/c. I choose the s/c for the following reasons.
1) The supercharger kit cost less than $5000, turbocharger kits START at $7500.
2) The supercharger was a much more simplistic install, I was able to do it completely by myself and in about half the time (or less) it would take to install a turbo. The turbo involves changing exhaust manifolds (a total nightmare on my car) and other modifications to the exhaust like relocating O2 sensors.
3) To plumb the turbo system is another nightmare, you often have to remove and reinstall chassis components to make way for the discharge tubing.
4) The turbo unit itself runs crazy hot since it is fed by 1000 degree exhaust. It requires tapping into the car's cooling system to run additional lines to keep the monster running at safe temperatures. A larger radiator may also be required because of this.
5) Speaking of tapping in... you also have to tap into the car's own lubrication system to run oil through the turbo, and tap (literally run a tap) into your oil pan for a return line. Also, since the turbo is now feeding piping hot oil back into your engine, a supplemental oil cooler (separate of the intercooler) needs to be installed to keep from basting the engine in 300+ degree oil.
6) A single turbocharger is much larger than a supercharger and needs to be mounted on the side of the engine. Not much room there on any modern car last time I looked. It's a crazy hard install (or an expensive one if you pay someone else.)
7) My supercharger is completely self-contained. It requires no additional cooling and doesn't recirculate any of it's oil back through my engine. Yes, it has to be changed independently of the car's oil changes, but only every 7500 miles, and it takes all of about 10 minutes.
8) The entire supercharger install was done from the top or front of the car and there was enough room to work on each facet of the install fairly comfortably.
9) The turbo install overall is fairly major surgery, the supercharger install is more like an outpatient procedure. When it comes time to sell the car the s/c kit, it is more easily reversed and replaced with the stock parts that were previously removed. Since the turbo required more butchering of the car to put on, it will naturally demand more work (and probable repurchase of OEM parts) to remove.
10) The turbo (for my car) would require a different front bumper cover to make room for the massive intercooler. That's another $500-$1000 for the part and the paint labor.
So yes, the turbo is more efficient, but I had to ask myself this... Is the turbo and its ~25 extra HP worth 20 hours of additional labor and an extra $3,000? For me, the answer was no, but for the more adventurous types it may be yes. That's why both options exist... different strokes, different folks.