yeah i knew thatthat comment was fueled by comments made in this thread.szhosain wrote:
Don't assume. He is an American citizen living in another country. And can still vote in US elections.
Z
its completely irrelevant to this thread.
yeah i knew thatthat comment was fueled by comments made in this thread.szhosain wrote:
Don't assume. He is an American citizen living in another country. And can still vote in US elections.
Z
I live in Japan. You know that. So, what was your motivation for asking a thusly rhetorical question?E7-S14 wrote:
u dont even live here?
I'll drink to that!yotik wrote:finally we have something in common
You seem pretty well put together and are able to formulate a well written thought and for that I commend you and respect your view. However, to say one person's view is biased because yours is different does not necessarily mean it is biased. Something of that nature that you responded to is a personal take/choice and was purely analytical. If someone wants to pay less taxes, so be it. However, what the difference between you two represents is a differing view of what role the government should play in society, not a biased post. A biased post would be something skewed in such a way to fit a position.yotik wrote:My view is not of communism, or free handouts for those below poverty level. My view is that we should live in a society of equality. Meaning that the wealthy and unwealthy have the same opportunities. Our country is more equal then ever before and this is great.
Probably not. You cannot see your opportunity clearly in this environment. I was there and I had to get out to find success. So what does this mean? It means that individuals of all color who are in poverty are at a great disadvantage. This is why there is affirmative action and reform programs like the one you spoke of at the Metropolitan Church.
one what? one gruesome freakish facial expression? one sexually attractive and unqualified VP choice? or maybe one more chance to bring up being a POW and how being shot down by and captured totally qualifies him as being leader of the free world? Good job becoming the next "get a brain morans" guy. I will say McCain had a truly exemplary speech after losing the election. If we had seen more of that man on the campaign trail he probably would have done at lot better come election time. The Aryan hooligans booing made me laugh though, keeping it classy. Also did anyone else notice the white ppl screwing up their own chant by being so off beat it hurt as well as changing what they were screaming halfway through, throwing 3/4 of the crowd off beat a second time?jdmtuner16 wrote:WHATS YOUR THOUGHTS??? i still wish McCAIN would have one!! i dislike obama!
First off, i like the avatar.On that note i need a restroom break.smockers83 wrote:
You seem pretty well put together and are able to formulate a well written thought and for that I commend you and respect your view. However, to say one person's view is biased because yours is different does not necessarily mean it is biased. Something of that nature that you responded to is a personal take/choice and was purely analytical. If someone wants to pay less taxes, so be it. However, what the difference between you two represents is a differing view of what role the government should play in society, not a biased post. A biased post would be something skewed in such a way to fit a position.
I firmly oppose communism. It may seem as a communist viewpoint but its actually very liberal. Its about creating an environment where people have the choice to succeed, and are not trapped in a struggle essentially created by those more fortunate. Reason being, the higher the standard, the tougher the climb for people at the bottom. As I see it, if you want to be a lawyer, be a lawyer. If you want to work at Burger King, go fill out the application. Pay your dues and you will eventually get there. In our society there are people who NEVER had a chance to be a lawyer let alone manager at burger king, who may very well have the fortitude.smockers83 wrote:Equality in society as you describe is very socialist to the point where it essentially is communism. Communism isn't a style of government, its a style of economy. To give everyone the same choices to have equality is fundamentally communist/socialist. In communistic/socialistic societies, there are wealthy and poor people as well. Our country is more equal than ever? Based on what? Because I beg to differ and it better not simply be because one man was elected to an office.
For the most part I agree here. This is a great idea The only thing here is, how do we make it so that people can see their opportunity?Is it enough to just make things available for people?smockers83 wrote:Low income people really do have the same opportunity, its just like you said though, its harder for them to see. We don't need to create a socialistic society in order to "give" them more opportunity, they just need to know how to seize the opportunity as you apparently did. They can go to school and go to college with federal and state aid, not many of them may know that, so they just need to be educated on the fact. In that sense we can show them more opportunity, but to call it equality of society, I don't know about that one.
smockers83 wrote:Affirmative action wasn't created to help low income and poverty stricken people and it hasn't necessarily helped people of all color. It does not promote equality either. The consequences of affirmative action are that someone of color gets an opportunity someone who is white deserved more, or some such thing. It could even be between two minorities, disadvantaging one over the other. It brings diversity but not equality because now the person that was more qualified does not have the opportunity. This is why states are finally taking down their affirmative action statutes as jobs and other opportunities shouldn't be decided on race and those statutes require race/gender/etc to become a factor.
Gotcha. The avatar came from a poster from when I was in college. The poster was part of a series of posters that the university put out during Parents Weekend to try and curb student drinking. This one was the best by far as the text above the dude said "Choose to be safe and legal" and below it was URINATE.yotik wrote:First off, i like the avatar.On that note i need a restroom break.
I firmly oppose communism. It may seem as a communist viewpoint but its actually very liberal.
But we are more equal than ever is because just a short 100 years ago people were still being hanged in the USA. So id say its more equal now than ever.
For the most part I agree here. This is a great idea The only thing here is, how do we make it so that people can see their opportunity?Is it enough to just make things available for people?
I mean everyone in america has the freedom to go to college but tons of people fail to go because they cant even think about going to school when they cant afford transportation. Trust ive been there. I used to walk 2miles to and from school every day because I couldnt afford bus tickets. The closest school bus was a mile walk and pointless to get up an hour earlier to catch it.
So in reality some people dont have the opportunity because the hurdles you have to jump to get the opportunity make the opportunity unrealistic.
It is closer to equality but i agree it doesnt solve the problem. We should be more invested in higher education etc on a state level than rolling out some washed over solution to this. Its nice to see the progress we are making as a country nonetheless. I like your thoughts bro you have enlightened me.
I wouldn't base anything on the actions of people from Philly. Philly is the butthole of the United States.JustinStrife wrote:The Aryan hooligans aren't as classy as the black thugs in Philly who were intimidating white voters with night sticks during election day...
There will be no 'coming together' for this country. Even under the 'Messiah'.
Detroit begs to differ, and will fight you.ishkabibble wrote:
I wouldn't base anything on the actions of people from Philly. Philly is the butthole of the United States.
Detroit is the appendix. It doesn't serve a purpose anymore, and nobody will miss it when it's gone.Jesda wrote:
Detroit begs to differ, and will fight you.
Hey lying douchenozzle. I see you're no longer posting in the classic Z forum. Why is that? Why aren't you telling us why you stole pictures from someone and claimed them as your own?Vista Sucks! wrote:
Are you serious?
Wow, I don't know if I should be calling this a racist/sexist post, or a sad attempt at making you feel better about yourself, because you hold some kind of guilt for being white. I have know idea what your race is, so I'll just say this was a pretty sad post in general, and I would guess Obama supporters are ashamed you associate yourself with them.BigMACKenzie wrote: one what? one gruesome freakish facial expression? one sexually attractive and unqualified VP choice? or maybe one more chance to bring up being a POW and how being shot down by and captured totally qualifies him as being leader of the free world? Good job becoming the next "get a brain morans" guy. I will say McCain had a truly exemplary speech after losing the election. If we had seen more of that man on the campaign trail he probably would have done at lot better come election time. The Aryan hooligans booing made me laugh though, keeping it classy. Also did anyone else notice the white ppl screwing up their own chant by being so off beat it hurt as well as changing what they were screaming halfway through, throwing 3/4 of the crowd off beat a second time?
We were the greatest nation in the world on November 3rd too, no change.Kalypso123 wrote:YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
we really are the greatest nation in the world.
Ugh, I hope not. I give them until early 2010 before I start being critical of things myself. There's a big mess out there, and a lot of people/policies are to blame... not just one man, or one party. It will take time to start seeing progress in any direction.audtatious wrote:We shall also see how they handle 4 years of catching flack for everything in the world being their fault.....
Agreed.Bawkchicken wrote:
Ugh, I hope not. I give them until early 2010 before I start being critical of things myself. There's a big mess out there, and a lot of people/policies are to blame... not just one man, or one party. It will take time to start seeing progress in any direction.
+1S13_love wrote:
Agreed.
In general, you are correct. For core changes that he promised that he goes away from then he should receive lots of flack. Initiating change should start immediately with the majority knowing it will take years. Coming back and saying it will take years to even start initiating change is deflecting and dishonest, based upon his promises.Bawkchicken wrote:
Ugh, I hope not. I give them until early 2010 before I start being critical of things myself. There's a big mess out there, and a lot of people/policies are to blame... not just one man, or one party. It will take time to start seeing progress in any direction.
Lets not forget the millions of people across the country who will lose jobs directly because of the Big 3 in Detroit or indirectly. If the any of the Big 3 fall, Honda, Toyota, and Nissan will have problems as well with suppliers that would go under. If Detroit falls, our economy will become much, much more worse. True story.ishkabibble wrote:Detroit is the appendix. It doesn't serve a purpose anymore, and nobody will miss it when it's gone.
eaxactlyaudtatious wrote:Your America is not the real America. Get used to it.
That's pretty much spot on.Jesda wrote:The feelers outnumber the thinkers.