My guess is that they wanted to keep it small, and keep it lightweight. That motor is more than capable of 500 hp (which is the planned output, and is the LIMIT in the JGTC GT500 class). That's plenty for a race car that will weigh 2000 lbs with aero assistance.RCA wrote:I love the look. The car is super sharp BUT then I was brought back down to earth with the engine choice:
Engine layout has to do with weight distribution. Low, and pushed back as far as they see fit.RCA wrote:Also what is up with the engine lay out and second electrical fan for the rear of the car?
that is damn sexy right theresimmode1 wrote:He needs to ready this kit for mass production...
True, still looks badass, and I wonder how that thing would handle. By what it looks like, its wider than pretty much all other 240's I've seen. I know that the 240 is already low-wide in comparison to an average car's height:width ratio (ie jetta = tall and narrow).mattblancarte wrote:Ugh, I guess I should correct myself in saying that it is no longer JGTC, but the Super GT.
No doubt, the best looking cars are the hardcore race cars. You just can't get that extreme of a look with a road car.
MY GOD! I almost jizd in my pants (lol) when I saw this sweet s14 do want that kit and wheel comboSirSilvia wrote:Not sure if anyone's seen this yet but they are building a GT500 style inspired s14 240sx Post on CarDomain You can see their main build site here. http://www.gt500.se/and now for some pics
He widened the car to 2000mm, which is almost a 25% increase over the stock width of the s14 chassis.SirSilvia wrote:True, still looks badass, and I wonder how that thing would handle. By what it looks like, its wider than pretty much all other 240's I've seen. I know that the 240 is already low-wide in comparison to an average car's height:width ratio (ie jetta = tall and narrow).
mattblancarte wrote:My guess is that they wanted to keep it small, and keep it lightweight....
keith0486 wrote:i don't see anything wrong with the SR its light...
Yea I understand all that but realize that this is a car designed for a circuit not a drag race. You get much more reliability for long distance racing when you have a N/A V-8 instead of a boosted SR mut.Dittoz7 wrote:What's Wrong With An SR Powering It?
Well that is fine and dandy but where the hell are you putting the engine? Underneath between the driver's seat and the passengers or above the passenger and driver? It is sitting in the middle of the car's cabin. Where are you sitting when driving?mattblancarte wrote:Engine layout has to do with weight distribution. Low, and pushed back as far as they see fit.
No, the first fan does that, and I assume the car's forward movement would push the air passed the rest of the car.mattblancarte wrote:The second fan is pulling air through that duct at low speeds. That duct goes over both the radiator and intercooler. More air plz.
I don't think that reliability is an issue with a properly built motor here. As long as cooling is efficient, it's not a bad choice. Turbo 4 cylinders have a home on the track, especially in Japanese circuit racing...RCA wrote: Yea I understand all that but realize that this is a car designed for a circuit not a drag race. You get much more reliability for long distance racing when you have a N/A V-8 instead of a boosted SR mut.
Yes, it looks to be inside the cabin to some degree. I'm not the engineer, so I can't say for certain, but I'm sure the driver is in a standard position with the motor/trans sitting somewhat beside.RCA wrote:Well that is fine and dandy but where the hell are you putting the engine? Underneath between the driver's seat and the passengers or above the passenger and driver? It is sitting in the middle of the car's cabin. Where are you sitting when driving?
The first fan is a push-fan. This helps air into the system at low speeds. Because that particular air duct runs the entire length of the car, he plans on using a PULL-FAN to help suck the air through the system at the rear.RCA wrote:No, the first fan does that, and I assume the car's forward movement would push the air passed the rest of the car.
Lol... so very wrong.HurryupandrunS13 wrote:Once and for all.... SR22VET is NASTY!!! Mazworx homey. It would be leaps and bounds better than a VQ for one, and secondly that is the pinnacle of the SR. I had an SR and didnt like it, but can't and won't hate on that engine!
And VQ FTL in this application
All you need is a picture to prove why the vq is a winning setup in the exact type of build :simmode1 wrote:I'm not even gonna bother proving the superiority of the VQ30DET for this application...
Spoken like a true SR fanboy. The VQ30DET was actually campaigned in the Super GT500 GTR's. Can you say the same for any SR?HurryupandrunS13 wrote:I4 > V6...... Engine harmonics and geometry are important in race applications. Never been in a VQ+T car so can't say theyre worthless, but im jus not a fan..
Haha I can't believe someone posted that after I even posted the pic of the Castrol Pitwork Skyline... WTF!simmode1 wrote:
Spoken like a true SR fanboy. The VQ30DET was actually campaigned in the Super GT500 GTR's.
But The Really Question On Everyone's Mind: Can It Drift...mattblancarte wrote:
Haha I can't believe someone posted that after I even posted the pic of the Castrol Pitwork Skyline... WTF!
just wait till Extreme Dimensions gets a hold of it! lmaosimmode1 wrote:He needs to ready this kit for mass production...