Nissan GT500

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
User avatar
SirSilvia
Posts: 1983
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:52 am
Car: Sold both my babies
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post

Not sure if anyone's seen this yet but they are building a GT500 style inspired s14 240sx Post on CarDomain You can see their main build site here. http://www.gt500.se/and now for some pics


User avatar
breadbox
Posts: 8549
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:09 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX
89 Koop
84 720 4x4KC
Location: Va Bch

Post

old, but still cool looking.

User avatar
SirSilvia
Posts: 1983
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:52 am
Car: Sold both my babies
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post

ah, didn't see anything on the search but honestly only seached a couple times :D

User avatar
VRoy
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:32 pm
Car: 93 S13 Hatch

Post

Looks like this is just a rendering? Check the driver out in the first pic, and the name on the door doesn't match. Still pretty sweet though. I checked out the site, wonder if they have gotten any further along. Seems they are trying to make the whole body out of CF, talk about some work.

User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

I love the look. The car is super sharp BUT then I was brought back down to earth with the engine choice:

An SR

Also what is up with the engine lay out and second electrical fan for the rear of the car?http://www.gt500.se/wp-content...w.jpgh ... nt...l.jpg

User avatar
VRoy
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:32 pm
Car: 93 S13 Hatch

Post

He has gotten a ton of attention.

[QUOTE=]So to sum up the revised plans:The 3D model is now in the hands of Bo Zolland @ Vizualtech again for some adjusting and fine tuning before converting it to CAD. Then the CAD-model will be prepared for CFD and for the making of molds. And finally the body will be casted in carbon fiber from the CNC-made molds.

I’ve been in contact with a lot of different companies for assistance with the CAD-modeling, CFD, mold-making and the carbon fiber casting. I’ve spent countless hours in e-mail conversations, on the phone and in both physical and web-based meetings with the different companies. Some small, some big and some I can’t even mention due to NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreements). Both national and international companies.It’s fair to say that it has been very time consuming, so much in fact that it has starting to affect my work. And that’s no good, thats the source for the budget to this project. (Not to mention all the time spent researching everything regarding the Nismo Festival visit.)If you have a tip on the subjects mentioned, or contact information for companies doing the work I need help with, please don’t hesitate to contact me. Any help is greatly appreciate[/QUOTE]

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

He needs to ready this kit for mass production...

And he needs to put a VQ30DET+T in the car.

User avatar
mattblancarte
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:14 pm
Car: 2005 BMW M3 Comp. Coupe

Post

RCA wrote:I love the look. The car is super sharp BUT then I was brought back down to earth with the engine choice:
My guess is that they wanted to keep it small, and keep it lightweight. That motor is more than capable of 500 hp (which is the planned output, and is the LIMIT in the JGTC GT500 class). That's plenty for a race car that will weigh 2000 lbs with aero assistance.
RCA wrote:Also what is up with the engine lay out and second electrical fan for the rear of the car?
Engine layout has to do with weight distribution. Low, and pushed back as far as they see fit.

The second fan is pulling air through that duct at low speeds. That duct goes over both the radiator and intercooler. More air plz.

User avatar
Dittoz7
Posts: 17694
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:08 pm
Car: 1997 2f0WtY SE!
Location: Miami, FL

Post

What's Wrong With An SR Powering It?

Less Weight, Same Power, Cheaper Parts.

If JGTC's Supra Were Able To Use 4 Cylinder Engines, Why Not Him?


User avatar
keith0486
Posts: 2612
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:44 pm

Post

i don't see anything wrong with the SR its light can have plenty of power if built right and parts are easy to come by.

User avatar
SirSilvia
Posts: 1983
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:52 am
Car: Sold both my babies
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post

simmode1 wrote:He needs to ready this kit for mass production...
that is damn sexy right there

User avatar
mattblancarte
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:14 pm
Car: 2005 BMW M3 Comp. Coupe

Post

Ugh, I guess I should correct myself in saying that it is no longer JGTC, but the Super GT.

No doubt, the best looking cars are the hardcore race cars. You just can't get that extreme of a look with a road car.

User avatar
HurryupandrunS13
Posts: 477
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 12:02 pm
Car: 1992 240 fastback

Post

Once and for all.... SR22VET is NASTY!!! Mazworx homey. It would be leaps and bounds better than a VQ for one, and secondly that is the pinnacle of the SR. I had an SR and didnt like it, but can't and won't hate on that engine!

And VQ FTL in this application

User avatar
SirSilvia
Posts: 1983
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:52 am
Car: Sold both my babies
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post

mattblancarte wrote:Ugh, I guess I should correct myself in saying that it is no longer JGTC, but the Super GT.

No doubt, the best looking cars are the hardcore race cars. You just can't get that extreme of a look with a road car.
True, still looks badass, and I wonder how that thing would handle. By what it looks like, its wider than pretty much all other 240's I've seen. I know that the 240 is already low-wide in comparison to an average car's height:width ratio (ie jetta = tall and narrow).

User avatar
Cody240
Posts: 337
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:04 pm
Car: 1990 240sx SE white with KA24DE

Post

SirSilvia wrote:Not sure if anyone's seen this yet but they are building a GT500 style inspired s14 240sx Post on CarDomain You can see their main build site here. http://www.gt500.se/and now for some pics
MY GOD! I almost jizd in my pants (lol) when I saw this sweet s14 do want that kit and wheel combo

User avatar
mattblancarte
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:14 pm
Car: 2005 BMW M3 Comp. Coupe

Post

SirSilvia wrote:True, still looks badass, and I wonder how that thing would handle. By what it looks like, its wider than pretty much all other 240's I've seen. I know that the 240 is already low-wide in comparison to an average car's height:width ratio (ie jetta = tall and narrow).
He widened the car to 2000mm, which is almost a 25% increase over the stock width of the s14 chassis.

It will handle like a rocket on rails.

User avatar
SirSilvia
Posts: 1983
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:52 am
Car: Sold both my babies
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post

^^ HAHAH sweet

User avatar
mattblancarte
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:14 pm
Car: 2005 BMW M3 Comp. Coupe

Post

If he is successful in his setup, it will actually not be too far off from this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...lated

User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

mattblancarte wrote:My guess is that they wanted to keep it small, and keep it lightweight....
keith0486 wrote:i don't see anything wrong with the SR its light...
Dittoz7 wrote:What's Wrong With An SR Powering It?
Yea I understand all that but realize that this is a car designed for a circuit not a drag race. You get much more reliability for long distance racing when you have a N/A V-8 instead of a boosted SR mut.
mattblancarte wrote:Engine layout has to do with weight distribution. Low, and pushed back as far as they see fit.
Well that is fine and dandy but where the hell are you putting the engine? Underneath between the driver's seat and the passengers or above the passenger and driver? It is sitting in the middle of the car's cabin. Where are you sitting when driving?
mattblancarte wrote:The second fan is pulling air through that duct at low speeds. That duct goes over both the radiator and intercooler. More air plz.
No, the first fan does that, and I assume the car's forward movement would push the air passed the rest of the car.

User avatar
SirSilvia
Posts: 1983
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:52 am
Car: Sold both my babies
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post

bahhh wish i was at home, work servers kockblock youtube

User avatar
mattblancarte
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:14 pm
Car: 2005 BMW M3 Comp. Coupe

Post

RCA wrote: Yea I understand all that but realize that this is a car designed for a circuit not a drag race. You get much more reliability for long distance racing when you have a N/A V-8 instead of a boosted SR mut.
I don't think that reliability is an issue with a properly built motor here. As long as cooling is efficient, it's not a bad choice. Turbo 4 cylinders have a home on the track, especially in Japanese circuit racing...

What particular v8 are you suggesting they use that has 400+whp and will fit within their design parameters? Not saying it's a bad idea, just posing the question.
RCA wrote:Well that is fine and dandy but where the hell are you putting the engine? Underneath between the driver's seat and the passengers or above the passenger and driver? It is sitting in the middle of the car's cabin. Where are you sitting when driving?
Yes, it looks to be inside the cabin to some degree. I'm not the engineer, so I can't say for certain, but I'm sure the driver is in a standard position with the motor/trans sitting somewhat beside.
RCA wrote:No, the first fan does that, and I assume the car's forward movement would push the air passed the rest of the car.
The first fan is a push-fan. This helps air into the system at low speeds. Because that particular air duct runs the entire length of the car, he plans on using a PULL-FAN to help suck the air through the system at the rear.

It's not that crazy of an idea.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

HurryupandrunS13 wrote:Once and for all.... SR22VET is NASTY!!! Mazworx homey. It would be leaps and bounds better than a VQ for one, and secondly that is the pinnacle of the SR. I had an SR and didnt like it, but can't and won't hate on that engine!

And VQ FTL in this application
Lol... so very wrong.

The builder of the car already has his mind set on his motor, so I'm not even gonna bother proving the superiority of the VQ30DET for this application...

User avatar
mattblancarte
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:14 pm
Car: 2005 BMW M3 Comp. Coupe

Post

simmode1 wrote:I'm not even gonna bother proving the superiority of the VQ30DET for this application...
All you need is a picture to prove why the vq is a winning setup in the exact type of build :


User avatar
HurryupandrunS13
Posts: 477
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 12:02 pm
Car: 1992 240 fastback

Post

I4 > V6...... Engine harmonics and geometry are important in race applications. Never been in a VQ+T car so can't say theyre worthless, but im jus not a fan..

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

HurryupandrunS13 wrote:I4 > V6...... Engine harmonics and geometry are important in race applications. Never been in a VQ+T car so can't say theyre worthless, but im jus not a fan..
Spoken like a true SR fanboy. The VQ30DET was actually campaigned in the Super GT500 GTR's. Can you say the same for any SR?

And the debate on engine harmonics? Laughable. The VQ has been a world renowned & award winning engine since it's debut in 1995. It's fine if you don't know anything about the VQ30DET, but it's not fine to make uneducated statements like I4>V6 or SR>All...

I guess you must have forgotten the new GTR uses a V6, too...

User avatar
EnjoiNismo
Posts: 1127
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:18 pm
Car: 93 240sx
Location: AZ

Post


User avatar
mattblancarte
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:14 pm
Car: 2005 BMW M3 Comp. Coupe

Post

simmode1 wrote:
Spoken like a true SR fanboy. The VQ30DET was actually campaigned in the Super GT500 GTR's.
Haha I can't believe someone posted that after I even posted the pic of the Castrol Pitwork Skyline... WTF!

User avatar
safin
Posts: 1138
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 6:35 am

Post

oh baby

User avatar
Dittoz7
Posts: 17694
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:08 pm
Car: 1997 2f0WtY SE!
Location: Miami, FL

Post

mattblancarte wrote:
Haha I can't believe someone posted that after I even posted the pic of the Castrol Pitwork Skyline... WTF!
But The Really Question On Everyone's Mind: Can It Drift...

User avatar
adrianfromthecastle
Posts: 18849
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 5:36 am
Car: 1992 Nissan 240sx
Location: California

Post

simmode1 wrote:He needs to ready this kit for mass production...
just wait till Extreme Dimensions gets a hold of it! lmao

the model looks hot! but I wanna see some real stuff already


Return to “240sx General Discussion”